NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs Statseeker comparison

NETSCOUT and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. NETSCOUT is ranked #85, while Techniche is ranked #63 with an average rating of 7.0. NETSCOUT holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Read 3 NETSCOUT vSTREAM reviews

677 Views
643 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

900 Views
855 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Statseeker and NETSCOUT vSTREAM compete in the network monitoring category. Statseeker seems to have the upper hand in pricing and customer satisfaction, while NETSCOUT vSTREAM shines with its robust features.

Features: Statseeker offers real-time network monitoring, high-speed data collection, and efficient data processing. NETSCOUT vSTREAM provides comprehensive network visibility, detailed packet-level analysis, and advanced monitoring capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker can enhance its network visibility, improve its packet-level analysis, and expand integration capabilities. NETSCOUT vSTREAM could simplify its deployment process, improve pricing flexibility, and streamline user interface complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker is known for its straightforward deployment model and responsive customer support. NETSCOUT vSTREAM, while more complex in deployment, offers extensive support for its advanced configurations.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker typically presents lower setup costs and faster ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. NETSCOUT vSTREAM, despite a higher initial investment, offers significant long-term benefits with its extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

85th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

63rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of NETSCOUT vSTREAM is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Statseeker	0.4%
NETSCOUT vSTREAM	0.4%
Other	99.2%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Keval Lodaya

Network Engineer at Inniti Network Solution

A user-friendly solution that is easy to install and improves visibility

I would like to see improvements made to the user guide. From my personal experience, it is helpful to see a list of steps describing what to do next in different situations. An example is what to do and what to back up in the case of certain types of failure. There are also cases where a customer can't understand specific features. Enhancements to the user guide would be helpful for this. More features for network fragmentation would be helpful.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the valuable features is the packet decoding."

"vSTREAM gives us better visibility and reporting about our network infrastructure, allowing for cost-optimization."

"We're able to recover more expensive ports on our access line devices."

"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."

"The most important feature is just the fact that it doesn't aggregate the information up, and I can look at detailed information going back quite a long time."

"It catches frequent flapping of the network and provides detailed reports of outages."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"The most valuable features are scalability and reliability."

"This solution helps in terms of troubleshooting, and you can do capacity planning with it."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"I would like to see improvements made to the user guide."

"Room for improvement exists in filtering in the packet decode."

"I would like for it to have a smaller footprint of the virtual appliance and better performance."

"This solution would be improved with better automatic discovery for ping-only devices."

"I would like to see more comprehensive reporting and alerting."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."

"It may be helpful to have more options in the alerting section."

"The user interface needs to be made more intuitive."

"Maybe they could provide a little bit more flexibility on creating custom dashboards."

"Configuration management: In configuration management it would be helpful if it would backup configuration files (running and start-up configuration) for devices. (Not sure if this is already available in the latest version)."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is quite expensive."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"The licensing cost is yearly and it's $5,000 to $8,000, I think."

"Statseeker is pretty cheap."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"We now feel the pricing is a good value. Previously we had a just a normal license but now we've got an Enterprise license. Since the Enterprise, it's been a lot better value. We did think it was pretty expensive before, but with the Enterprise license it's almost less than half that price. If you have a number of accounts within the organization that use Statseeker, I would suggest get the Enterprise license."

"When it came to selecting this solution, it came down to cost."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

14%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Statseeker?

We are content with our current setup and its features. Additionally, we appreciate Statseeker's responsiveness to our queries and requests for improvements, particularly in monitoring. The upcomin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Statseeker?

There is a need for many developments to mature Statseeker. It should provide a study use case to show how it monitors the SD-WAN service.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Statseeker?

Statseeker provides the basic monitoring status of our network elements, including latency, ping delays, and ping drops. Its strengths lie in a couple of areas. Firstly, it is not an expensive tool...

See all answers

Comparisons

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 30% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 29% of the time

NetMon vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 21% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs NETSCOUT vSTREAM

Compared 20% of the time

More NETSCOUT vSTREAM Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 29% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 19% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 15% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 12% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download NETSCOUT vSTREAM product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

January 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

vSTREAM

No data available

Overview

The vSTREAM virtual appliance complements existing Adaptive Session Intelligence (ASI)-based instrumentation to provide the same level of visibility within virtualized and cloud infrastructures that is already possible in physical environments. The vSTREAM virtual appliance is ideal for monitoring service-critical traffic running within virtualized or cloud infrastructures, either locally on a host or as an aggregation point for multiple hosts. With complete visibility across physical, virtual and cloud networks, the vSTREAM virtual appliance presents real-time views of end-to-end call trace data and network-wide KPIs, to protect the reliability and availability of networks and application services.

NETSCOUT

Statseeker is the only network performance monitoring technology to seamlessly and successfully combine speed + scale + value. Statseeker is a global provider delivering innovative network monitoring solutions for the IT enterprise and OT industrial market space. With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Instant visibility: Installed in minutes, polls up to 1 million ports from a single server… reduce your time to repair. Powerful monitoring: Checks every port over entire network, every 60 seconds… low network consumption bandwidth. Fast reporting: Practical real-time dashboard, reports in seconds, instant alerts… maximize your up-time. Smart data: 100% network data, original granularity, never rolled up, never averaged… tune for peak performance, control CAPEX and OPEX.

Techniche

Sample Customers

Metropolitan Police Agency, Banpara, PropertyRoom.com

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs. Statseeker

December 2025

Free Report: NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NETSCOUT vSTREAM vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.