MuleSoft Composer vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Salesforce and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,650 Views
512 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 27 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,748 Views
1,649 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Composer and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Tungsten RPA

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.4

MuleSoft Composer improves data exchange, boosts efficiency by up to 70%, and supports scalable integration across departments, suggesting high value.

Sentiment score

7.7

Tungsten RPA cuts costs by 70%, reduces workforce needs, and boosts efficiency in aviation, government, and migration projects.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

One of our customers said that one RPA robot could do three-person jobs, and they were able to reduce their workforce accordingly.

reviewer2235981

Strategic And Business Performance Manger at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.2

MuleSoft Composer's customer service is generally satisfactory, though improvements are needed in response time and priority services.

Sentiment score

6.5

Tungsten RPA technical support is prompt and expert, but response times and availability vary based on complexity and contracts.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.0

MuleSoft Composer is rated positively for scalability, supporting both large user numbers and smaller groups efficiently.

Sentiment score

6.9

Tungsten RPA offers scalable, adaptable solutions for all organizations, requiring setup time and structured deployment for success.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

Users praise MuleSoft Composer's stability and support, noting minor glitches but effective resource deployment and no crashes.

Sentiment score

7.7

Tungsten RPA is generally stable and reliable, though legacy integration issues and lack of insights tools present challenges.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Room For Improvement

MuleSoft Composer needs platform integration, interface, scalability enhancements, effective guidance, AI, simplified configuration, and improved monitoring features.

Tungsten RPA requires better support, documentation, scalability, integration, intuitive interface, expanded browser support, and enhanced community and features.

It would be better to concentrate on one platform and develop everything on it for the integrated development environment.

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

The lack of a developer community in Tungsten RPA is a red flag for us and for customers.

reviewer2235981

Strategic And Business Performance Manger at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Setup Cost

MuleSoft Composer pricing is seen as high, prompting calls for regional adjustments to enhance accessibility for medium companies.

Tungsten RPA offers subscription pricing with varied costs, competitive yet more expensive than UiPath, plus a 10% annual support fee.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Valuable Features

MuleSoft Composer simplifies integration for Salesforce users with prebuilt connectors and compatibility without requiring programming skills.

Tungsten RPA excels in integration, security, and flexibility with highlights in email preservation, automation, and comprehensive technical support.

It has more options for installation and architecture because it can run entirely on-premise.

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Composer report

If you don't have a computer science background, you can easily use Tungsten RPA because this is a low-code platform and it is easier than other RPA tools.

reviewer2235981

Strategic And Business Performance Manger at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Tungsten RPA report

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (26th), Cloud Data Integration (16th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (12th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (7th)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

I have worked with Microsoft Power Platform and UiPath. Kofax RPA offers a comprehensive solution with built-in capabilities for executing tasks like running Excel files and web automation without additional servers. They provide their browsers and extensions. For functions such as OCR, image processing, and data extraction, Kofax has built-in features powered by their engine, eliminating the need for subscriptions to external technologies like Microsoft Cognitive Services or Google Search. One of Kofax RPA's strongest features is its on-premise solution, which is particularly beneficial for organizations operating in regions with data regulations, such as the UAE.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	18

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

The pricing models across the market initially differed significantly, as most RPA implementations were licensed on a per bot basis, unlike Tungsten RPA, which uses a server-based model. Though the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

Automation of complex processes involving stable legacy systems could be a major plus. The biggest issue lies in the stability of the target environment. Automating systems based on Citrix, where u...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 9% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 5% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 38% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 8% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 7% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 6% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

January 2026

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. Tungsten RPA

February 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. Tungsten RPA report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.