Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

MuleSoft Composer vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.4
MuleSoft Composer improves data exchange, boosts efficiency by up to 70%, and supports scalable integration across departments, suggesting high value.
Sentiment score
7.2
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite enhances efficiency, reduces headcount, and delivers cost savings through automation and integration, despite initial costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.2
MuleSoft Composer's customer service is generally satisfactory, though improvements are needed in response time and priority services.
Sentiment score
7.4
SEEBURGER's support is reliable with responsive service, though language and time-zone issues may affect personalization and customization speed.
The support provided by SEEBURGER is excellent.
Seeburger Lead EDI Developer/Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I would rate my experience with the technical support of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite as 10 out of 10.
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.0
MuleSoft Composer is rated positively for scalability, supporting both large user numbers and smaller groups efficiently.
Sentiment score
7.4
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite excels in scalability and flexibility, easily adapting to various business needs with cloud integration.
The scalability depends primarily on the mapping itself, as the connection and file flow are in the cloud.
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Users praise MuleSoft Composer's stability and support, noting minor glitches but effective resource deployment and no crashes.
Sentiment score
8.0
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers reliable stability, minimal issues, swift error handling, and near-perfect uptime with responsive support.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a very stable product, and I haven't noticed any significant drawbacks.
Seeburger Lead EDI Developer/Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I would rate the stability of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite as 9 out of 10.
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
 

Room For Improvement

MuleSoft Composer needs platform integration, interface, scalability enhancements, effective guidance, AI, simplified configuration, and improved monitoring features.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite needs interface simplification, enhanced monitoring, better documentation, and improved cloud integration and cost models.
It would be better to concentrate on one platform and develop everything on it for the integrated development environment.
BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
This requires restarting the application to update the IP address, which is an issue from the SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vendor side.
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
Acquiring training documents on a public domain for SEEBURGER is challenging.
Seeburger Lead EDI Developer/Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

MuleSoft Composer pricing is seen as high, prompting calls for regional adjustments to enhance accessibility for medium companies.
SEEBURGER's flexible licensing and comprehensive features offer competitive pricing, justifying its cost despite complexity for many organizations.
Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
 

Valuable Features

MuleSoft Composer simplifies integration for Salesforce users with prebuilt connectors and compatibility without requiring programming skills.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite offers platform independence, strong EDI automation, seamless SAP integration, scalability, and comprehensive global B2B integration.
It has more options for installation and architecture because it can run entirely on-premise.
BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
It comes pre-loaded with solutions, meaning it is ready to use without requiring significant development.
Seeburger Lead EDI Developer/Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application.
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
 

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
14th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (25th), Cloud Data Integration (15th)
SEEBURGER Business Integrat...
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
13th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (5th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (14th), API Management (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 2.5%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 3.2%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite3.2%
MuleSoft Composer2.5%
Other94.3%
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903 - PeerSpot reviewer
BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility
I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.
SS
Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech
Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration
The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Retailer
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise2
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise38
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?
The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.
What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?
I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...
What do you like most about SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a highly stable solution that offers rich features for our B2B integration.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.
What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?
Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...
 

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce
SEEBURGER BIS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.
879,899 professionals have used our research since 2012.