Mimecast Incydr vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

Mimecast and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Mimecast is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0. Mimecast holds a 2.4% mindshare in DLP, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Mimecast users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Mimecast Incydr

Read 78 Mimecast Incydr reviews

2,883 Views
1,384 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reviews

1,839 Views
1,839 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mimecast Incydr

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Mimecast Incydr and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention are two competing solutions in the data security sector. Mimecast Incydr is often preferred for its affordable pricing and customer-centric support, whereas Palo Alto's robust features and comprehensive offerings give it a competitive edge for businesses valuing extensive security measures.

Features: Mimecast Incydr offers real-time threat detection, seamless platform integration, and accessible pricing, making it suitable for smaller enterprises. Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat intelligence, fine-grained policy controls, and extensive configuration options, appealing to enterprises needing detailed security measures.

Room for Improvement: Mimecast Incydr could enhance its configuration options and broaden its security features to compete more effectively with detailed solutions. Additionally, improving scalability for larger enterprises could expand its market reach. Meanwhile, Palo Alto could simplify some of its advanced configurations to facilitate quicker deployments, offer more user-friendly interfaces for ease of use, and work on making their support channels more promptly accessible for non-complex issues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast Incydr ensures a straightforward deployment with a focus on smooth transition support, while Palo Alto Networks, despite more complex initial setups, equips users with extensive resources for deployment from start to finish. Mimecast's ease contrasts with Palo Alto's sophisticated configurability but both offer commendable support.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast Incydr's competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI are advantageous for smaller businesses, emphasizing value. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks, despite higher costs, provides significant ROI with its expansive security features, catering more to larger organizations with complex needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Mimecast Incydr vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mimecast Incydr

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

20th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Mimecast Incydr is 2.4%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention	2.1%
Mimecast Incydr	2.4%
Other	95.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Chuck_Mackey

Director, Cybersecurity Consulting at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support

In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue. It really has to do with the overall infrastructure and what the organization is prepared to do. If the infrastructure or the networking is a little hinky or you don't have a really finely tuned network infrastructure environment and your patches aren't up to date on your servers and your endpoints, it could get a little sticky. Other than that, it was okay. We really didn't have much problem beyond that. It took a couple of days to sort that out, but it was no big deal.

Read full review

Satish Tr

Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Good security and DLP capabilities that protects from unauthorized access

There are a lot of problems reported, which get sorted out. I really cannot remember what those problems are. It's mostly performance issues. Performance issues might be based on the pricing, and perhaps the customer has not properly sized the requirement. I have not personally seen this, but maybe I need to check with my committee.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan."

"Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome."

"It has quite a bit of flexibility in configuring backup sets."

"There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure."

"Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

"It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup."

"Works in the background and users are able to perform restores."

"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive."

More Mimecast Incydr pros

"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."

"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"It is a stable solution with good support."

"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

Cons

"You can't always filter out data that you'd like to."

"Due to recent changes that effectively abandoned an entire segment of their user base, I no longer trust nor can recommend Code42 products."

"There doesn't seem to be any feature that is lacking."

"What I think could be improved is how I get support."

"Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited."

"Java, please get rid of Java."

"I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin."

"In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process, and it became a little laborious. It would just turn away. The agents were not being distributed. It was just churning and churning and churning. When we were looking for specific categories of data, it was getting bogged down, but that was not even so much Code42, although some of it was their issue."

More Mimecast Incydr cons

"Pricing is expensive."

"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."

"There are mostly performance issues."

"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."

"The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."

"It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."

"It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."

"It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."

"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."

"It's expensive."

"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."

"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	24
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your primary use case for Code42 Incydr?

Data Leakage Protection on large scale environments. This can be to protect against leakage on endpoints and servers that consist of highly classified or propriety information. It can be added on a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits for virtual machine firewalls or containers, which simplifies the process, while...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simplifying the initial setup procedure could also be beneficial as it currently requ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The primary use case is a part of a complete package for Government of Canada. It helps in comparing data loss prevention against Fortinet, making it a cost-effective solution. It is used in the co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 7% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Mimecast Incydr

Compared 5% of the time

More Mimecast Incydr Competitors

Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 33% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 12% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 10% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr

January 2026

Download Mimecast Incydr product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore

No data available

Overview

Mimecast Incydr offers a comprehensive data protection and recovery solution, ideal for organizations needing robust insider threat protection and regulatory compliance.

Mimecast Incydr provides a seamless experience across platforms with lightweight clients and centralized administration. It focuses on real-time monitoring, instant access to backups, strong encryption, and customizable risk scoring. This ensures data protection against insider threats while promoting ease of use and low system overhead. Although improvements are possible in areas like Java dependency reduction, GUI design, cloud storage integration, and comprehensive reporting, Mimecast Incydr remains valuable for data classification, legal discovery, and identity management, especially for large environments handling classified information.

What key features does Mimecast Incydr offer?

Lightweight Clients: Ensures minimal system impact
Version Backups: Keeps data secure with historical availability
Seamless Data Recovery: Provides instant access to critical data
Multi-Platform Compatibility: Operates across diverse systems
Strong Encryption: Protects sensitive information
Customizable Risk Scoring: Tailors threat assessment to needs
Flexible Storage Options: Supports continuous backup capabilities

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Ease of Use: Simplifies deployment and management
Regulatory Compliance: Aids adherence to industry standards
Centralized Administration: Streamlines management processes
Low System Overhead: Minimizes resource consumption
Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates prompt threat response

Mimecast Incydr is leveraged across industries for data leakage protection and egress solution integration. It supports HIPAA-compliant backups and peer-to-peer data management, proving invaluable for corporate data protection and traveling employees facing data loss risks. Its application in legal data discovery and disaster recovery planning enhances its relevance for IT administrators and compliance officers managing data-intensive operations.

Mimecast

Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Incydr vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

December 2025

Free Report: Mimecast Incydr vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Mimecast Incydr vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mimecast Incydr vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.