We performed a comparison between MicroStrategy Usher and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Mobile Identity solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The solution has good analysis features to make sure there's good sizing (so that it's not too big or too small) and allows room for growth if a company needs it."
"The mobile identity features are great."
"What I like most about Oracle Identity Governance is that it is a very flexible tool. It allows you to do any customization on Java as it is built on Java and you can write any customization code using Java. I also like that Oracle Identity Governance is pretty much stable. In my company, there are a lot of users, so my company prefers this solution."
"Password management is a valuable feature."
"Understanding what a customer is using, what they are looking for, and allowing permissions is a challenge. We use the information we get in order to understand the behavior of the customer beyond the security and to understand what they have been doing in the last month. It's a nice way to understand what is attracting the customer and what they are clicking. That could be implemented by using this kind of application."
"The most important feature is the connectors. Without the connectors, it can do nothing."
"The most valuable feature is the user manager certification that approves or removes user access."
"The one thing that stands out was is the automatic sign-out when an employee goes on vacation. Identity Governance can monitor when an employee goes on vacation and returns. We use this feature to automatically disable all the employee's accounts when they go on vacation, and they're automatically enabled when they come back."
"The support service of Oracle is good. We use it a lot and their response is quick."
"The most valuable features in Oracle Identity Governance are identity and access management."
"The pricing needs improvement."
"Scaling this solution can be difficult."
"The solution needs to improve its web interface in the next release."
"It's a complex solution, so it will take time in terms of deployment."
"The solution should be easy to implement with components combined in one file and built-in features to integrate target applications without having to install additional connectors."
"Pricing for Oracle Identity Governance could be improved. The setup process for the tool could also be faster."
"The user interface experience needs to be improved."
"Identity Governance is a difficult tool to work with. You have to input many models to understand what is happening with the logins. The user interface is not so good. And a lot of the features we use aren't available out of the box."
"One of the areas that need some improvement with Oracle specifically is the ease of implementation."
"The platform could be enhanced with additional features."
MicroStrategy Usher is ranked 3rd in Mobile Identity with 2 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 1st in Mobile Identity with 11 reviews. MicroStrategy Usher is rated 7.6, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of MicroStrategy Usher writes "Improved the way to exploit and analyze data and offers no interruptions in service when running". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "Enables us to understand a customer's interests but it is missing a lot ". MicroStrategy Usher is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Identity Manager and Saviynt. See our MicroStrategy Usher vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.
See our list of best Mobile Identity vendors.
We monitor all Mobile Identity reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
