Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Sucuri comparison

Microsoft and Sucuri Security are both solutions in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.4, while Sucuri Security is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 8.2% mindshare in WAF, compared to Sucuri Security’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 79% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sucuri Security users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Application...

Read 48 Microsoft Azure Application Gateway reviews

7,699 Views
4,669 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Sucuri

Read 6 Sucuri reviews

683 Views
269 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Application...

Sucuri

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Sucuri and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are competitors in the web application security and delivery sector. Sucuri is preferred for its affordability and strong security features, whereas Azure Application Gateway stands out with its vast feature set and integration within the Azure ecosystem, although it comes with a higher cost.

Features: Sucuri provides a robust web application firewall, DDoS protection, and malware scanning, ensuring solid website security and monitoring. Azure Application Gateway offers advanced load balancing, SSL termination, and seamless integration with Azure services, catering well to complex enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: Sucuri could improve by expanding its integration capabilities and offering more advanced customization options. The user interface could also be enhanced for better usability. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could benefit from simplified setup processes and lower pricing to appeal to smaller businesses. Its monitoring features could be further refined for better user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sucuri is known for simple deployment and responsive customer support, making it accessible for various web platforms. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway requires more technical knowledge for deployment but offers robust support within the Azure ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: Sucuri's pricing is budget-friendly, offering a good return on investment for its security services. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway involves higher initial and ongoing costs, justified by its comprehensive feature offerings and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Application...

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

3rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) (3rd)

Sucuri

Ranking in Web Application Firewall (WAF)

24th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (15th), Domain Name System (DNS) Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Web Application Firewall (WAF) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is 8.2%, down from 13.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sucuri is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Application Firewall (WAF)

Featured Reviews

Bonieber Orofeo

IT Manager at Chong Hua Hospital

Application gateway optimizes performance and simplifies cloud transitions

There are a lot of things I appreciate about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is beneficial for us as it helps in publishing our website, providing us comfort when it comes to the availability of our applications. The autoscaling feature in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is very obvious, and I have no issues with it; it is well planned and organized. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway impacts our cost savings while maintaining higher performance. The Web Application Firewall (WAF) in Microsoft Azure Application Gateway has been very effective in protecting applications from security threats. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway helps us manage our AI-driven applications by enabling faster transactions, improving our work.

Read full review

Akshit Malik

Junior Associate - IT at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Provides website security, safeguarding against various threats and effective protection against DDoS attacks

The initial setup is moderate because it's neither too easy nor too hard. Sucuri provides us with many ways to set up our site, handle the routing, and perform the necessary configurations. It's deployed on the cloud. We used the managed service of Sucuri and then routed all the requests from Sucuri to our AWS platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Good customization; able to report and take action on alerts."

"We use the product in front-end and back-end applications to do the load balancing smartly."

"The production is a valuable feature."

"Microsoft has a vast variety of tools, and it blends very well."

"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."

"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."

"I rate Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 1000 users who use it daily."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pros

"It significantly eases the workload and streamlines the initial setup required to protect a website."

"The initial setup was straightforward. Straight forward because the plugin can simply be installed and then it does its job. It's not complex, there is no learning curve. The online scan is simple, you put in the website address and the scan gives us a report on the browser itself. It's simple to use."

"The most valuable part is the analytics and visualization."

"Domain name scanning since it allows us to scan all our domain names and determine whether it has malware or if is reported as phishing."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"I use it as a WAF, which is basically a web firewall to monitor and block traffic to our web server."

Cons

"For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved."

"Customer service can be improved. There is room for improvement, specifically in paid support, by providing more direct contact."

"It takes a lot of time for a certificate to update in the system. That is a huge drawback, affecting the load-balancing side. And when there are changes to the load balancing, it affects the end-user."

"The solution could improve by increasing the performance when doing updates. For example, if I change the certificate it can take 30 minutes. Other vendors do not have this type of problem."

"The support provided for the solution has certain shortcomings that need improvement, especially when it comes to the response time from the support team."

"The increased security that we are considering is because of some of the things that the security team has brought to our attention. They have pointed out that we would most likely require a better web application firewall than Azure Application Gateway."

"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."

"The support can be improved when you are configuring the system rules. The Disaster Recovery feature can be added in the next release. The price of the solution can be reduced a bit."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway cons

"In terms of improvement, the cost factor is always there."

"It would greatly benefit customers if they implemented an online chat or messaging system for quicker assistance."

"I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. The reason is that we have found sometimes customers or Google saying that there is something wrong with the website but Sucuri says that the site is clean so we do have to look at the site manually which means that the Sucuri scan does not pick up anything and everything."

"Sucuri could provide help for specific security alerts in-line instead of requiring users to search for it in the help section."

"Confident score: Currently it does not have one and there are cases that most websites flagged are false-positives."

"The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing for Azure Application Gateway, I would rate it at seven."

"The solution is fairly priced."

"The solution is paid monthly. The solution is highly expensive."

"I rate the pricing seven out of ten because some third-party solutions are even costlier than this."

"We use the tool's basic subscription. Its licensing costs are monthly."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten, with ten being cheap and one being expensive."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"It is an expensive solution. We have an enterprise agreement, it is monthly."

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway pricing and cost advice

"Sucuri offers different plans, both the standard plan and an advanced plan. So there are different plans to choose from."

"It stands out as a more cost-effective option compared to other cloud-based security services like Cloudflare or JetPass."

"I’d simply say it’s really worth it."

"The ROI has been very good. Because of the solution, I have a tax break. The site developers were not always experienced people. We used to pay more for cleaning up the site when it was infected. Now, we have peace of mind knowing that the solution will clean up the site and that we won't have to go through the unnecessary process of restoring it from a backup. The protection on the WAF and the measures for backups have also prevented our site from going down."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

27%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Azure Front Door and Application Gateway?

We found Azure Front Door to be easily scaled and very stable. The implementation is very fast and Microsoft provides excellent support. Azure Front Door can quickly detect abnormalities before the...

See all answers

How does AWS WAF compare to Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Web Application Firewall or Microsoft Azure Application Gateway web application firewall software was the better fit ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway?

Application Gateway automatically redirects unwanted users and takes care of the security aspect. It also handles the performance side of things, which is why we use it.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sucuri?

The initial setup was very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sucuri?

The pricing is very reasonable. Sucuri offer other features as an add-on, such as backup, but these have an additional cost. We host the sites ourselves, so I don't take it because it was redundant.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sucuri?

The main improvement I would like to see is support for .NET applications. If they could include this feature, I would include more sites in the protection. In future releases, perhaps Sucuri could...

See all answers

Comparisons

F5 Advanced WAF vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 12% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 10% of the time

HAProxy vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

Cloudflare vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 9% of the time

NetScaler vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

Compared 8% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Competitors

Cloudflare vs Sucuri

Compared 48% of the time

SiteLock vs Sucuri

Compared 18% of the time

AWS WAF vs Sucuri

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs Sucuri

Compared 11% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Sucuri

Compared 7% of the time

More Sucuri Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

May 2025

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway report

Download Microsoft Azure Application Gateway product report

Buyer's Guide

Sucuri

May 2025

Download Sucuri product report

Also Known As

Azure Application Gateway, MS Azure Application Gateway

No data available

Overview

Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that enables you to manage traffic to your web applications. Traditional load balancers operate at the transport layer (OSI layer 4 - TCP and UDP) and route traffic based on source IP address and port, to a destination IP address and port.

To learn more about our solution, ask questions, and share feedback, join our Microsoft Security, Compliance and Identity Community.

Microsoft

Sucuri gives website owners peace of mind with solutions that prevent hackers from abusing websites, and professional response services to those compromised. Sucuri is dedicated to researching the latest and emerging threats affecting websites like yours. Website security should be attainable for all website owners; we focus on making that a reality. Get back to running awesome WordPress websites. Our services are built around three principles – People. Process. Technology.

Sucuri Security

Sample Customers

Lilly, AccuWeather, AIRFRANCE, Honeywell

The Loft Salon, Tom McFarlin, WPBeginner, Taylor Town, Everything Everywhere, Financial Ducks in a Row, Chubstr, Real Advice Gal, Sujan Patel, Wallao, List25, School the World

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri

June 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Sucuri report.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.