OpenText Operations Orchestration vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

The compared OpenText and IBM solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #26 in PA , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 0.7% mindshare in the category. IBM is ranked #7 in RA , and holds a 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Read 26 OpenText Operations Orchestration reviews

1,040 Views
458 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,416 Views
1,345 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText Operations Orchest...

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Operations Orchestration and UrbanCode Deploy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Orchest...

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (26th), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (19th)

UrbanCode Deploy

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (7th)

Mindshare comparison

OpenText Operations Orchestration and UrbanCode Deploy aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. OpenText Operations Orchestration is designed for Process Automation and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, down 0.9% compared to last year.
UrbanCode Deploy, on the other hand, focuses on Release Automation, holds 5.2% mindshare, up 3.2% since last year.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Operations Orchestration	0.7%
Camunda	24.8%
Temporal	7.4%
Other	67.1%

Process Automation

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UrbanCode Deploy	5.2%
Microsoft Azure DevOps	30.8%
GitLab	29.0%
Other	35.0%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Increases productivity with automation and robust orchestration capabilities

The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available. There are ready-made workflows, integration with other products, a nice user interface, and reporting. The tool is flexible, agent-based or agentless. It allows significant automation and has robust orchestration and reporting capabilities. It is easy to configure and use, leading to increased efficiency across our IT processes.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."

"The community is very powerful, with extensive knowledge bases available."

"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."

"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."

"In my environment, if I want to shut down all tools in one shot, I can create a workflow and run the workflow to shut down all tools in one go."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

Cons

"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."

"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."

"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."

"I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios."

"Only the tool's support can be a drawback where improvements are needed."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is very high compared to anything else available."

"The tool is expensive. I rate the tool a six if one is cheap and ten is very expensive."

"I do not have experience with the pricing or licensing of the product."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

41%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	20

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Operations Orchestration?

The pricing is medium, and the automation helps in cost and time savings, resulting in substantial value for money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Operations Orchestration?

I would prefer the addition of ready-made workflows for common scenarios such as Oracle database switchovers or Exchange server scenarios. This would save time by not starting from scratch each time.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Operations Orchestration?

This tool serves as a central management hub, allowing seamless control of various IT processes via one console. I rate this solution eight out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 41% of the time

Control-M vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 15% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

ServiceNow Orchestration vs OpenText Operations Orchestration

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText Operations Orchestration Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 20% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 11% of the time

AWS CodeDeploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Operations Orchestration

August 2025

OpenText Operations Orchestration report

Download OpenText Operations Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

August 2025

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Orchestration, Operations Orchestration, HPOO, HPE Operations Orchestration

uDeploy

Overview

OpenText Operations Orchestration (OO) automates, integrates, and orchestrates any IT process, on cloud or off. Automate using low-code/no-code workflow authoring options. Integrate with an API rich, extensible platform. Centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows.

With OO you can automate and orchestrate infrastructure automation and IT processes from service fulfillment to incident remediation, cloud service delivery, and disaster recovery.

Operations Orchestration offers the tools needed to provide enterprise wide orchestration capabilities:

Design automation workflows with a low-code/no-code designer canvas, content library, and API generator wizards.
Govern your automation in one place and centrally orchestrate powerful, scalable workflows in large, high availability environments.
Schedule workflows and make sure that SLAs are met and workflows execution happens when you need it.
Expose REST APIs to programmatically invoke orchestration from any external source.
Automate difficult interfaces with RPA robots that mimic screen based human actions.
Follow business and operational metrics to understand the value and the health of your orchestration environment.
Expose orchestration scenarios as services to your end users in an easy to use Self-Service catalog.

Operations Orchestration offers the following components:

OpenText

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

Casablanca INT, Internet Initiative Japan, Railway Information Systems, Samsung SDS, and Turkcell.

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.