GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

GitLab and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. GitLab is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.6, while IBM is ranked #6. GitLab holds a 30.7% mindshare in RA, compared to IBM’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 84 GitLab reviews

10,026 Views
471 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,862 Views
339 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

GitLab

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

GitLab and UrbanCode Deploy compete in the DevOps space, with each offering distinct capabilities. GitLab seems to have the upper hand due to its strong CI/CD pipeline features enhancing code quality through branch management and peer reviews.

Features: GitLab emphasizes continuous integration and delivery capabilities with automated deployment, repository management, and robust pipelines. UrbanCode Deploy focuses on extensive plugin-based architecture, a server/agent model that automates various environments, and a strong toolset for complex deployments.

Room for Improvement: UrbanCode Deploy requires enhanced repository support, streamlined upgrades, and better reporting features. GitLab could improve integration with container management like AWS and focus on security enhancements. Both products may benefit from better plugin availability and integration enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UrbanCode Deploy suits on-premises with customizable solutions but can be slow in issue resolution. GitLab supports various environments, offering flexibility and substantial help from its open-source community, though advanced support could improve.

Pricing and ROI: UrbanCode Deploy's cost scales with agents and servers, offering significant ROI through automation. GitLab, as an open-source solution, offers a cost-effective entry with appealing plans, although enterprise features might be costly, yet offering a competitive cost-to-value ratio.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Release Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (9th), Build Automation (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (3rd), DevSecOps (1st)

UrbanCode Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of GitLab is 30.7%, down from 35.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UrbanCode Deploy is 5.9%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab ( /products/gitlab-reviews ) are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people."

"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

"We have seen a couple of merge requests or pull requests raised in GitLab. I see the interface, the way it shows the difference between the two source codes, that it is easy for anyone to do the review and then accept the request; the pull request is the valuable feature."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

"The solution's most valuable features are pipelines."

"GitLab is kind of an image of GitHub, so it gives us the flexibility to monitor our changes in the repos."

"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."

"The most valuable features of Gitlab are integration with CIE and the ability to rapidly deploy solutions, projects, and applications. It is very easy to use, and there are no complaints."

More GitLab pros

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

Cons

"The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features."

"Technologies are always changing. Nowadays, new things like serverless computing and workload management have emerged. We have noticed a few gap items for faster service delivery. For example, we do user interface testing in the latest team and automate it using some tools. Recently, we integrated a tool with user interface testing, which can simulate a multi-user environment. So, we would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

"Reporting could be improved."

"The self-hosted version of GitLab is not very stable when under load. It slows down and requires restarts every few days."

"We'd like to see better integration with the Atlassian ecosystem."

"GitLab would be improved with the addition of templates for deployment on local PCs."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

More GitLab cons

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"We are using the open-source version."

"The price is okay."

"I'm not sure if they have some kind of discount. I've been negotiating with them on prices before, and I believe they weren't too happy to give discounts, but list prices are $19 per user, per month for Premium and $99 per user, per month for Ultimate. So, the difference between Premium and Ultimate is a bit bigger, and in most companies, you need to build some type of business case."

"The solution is based on a subscription model and is reasonably priced."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Educational Organization

46%

Financial Services Firm

25%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

One significant feature we lack is the configuration that enforces code reviews, which simplifies the development life cycle. Unfortunately, this is available only at a higher license level than we...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 7% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 21% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 17% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 10% of the time

BMC Release Lifecycle Management vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodeDeploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

June 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

May 2025

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

uDeploy

Overview

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

GitLab

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy

June 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.