GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

GitLab and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. GitLab is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2, while IBM is ranked #7. GitLab holds a 29.5% mindshare in RA, compared to IBM’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

GitLab

Read 87 GitLab reviews

17,724 Views
7,621 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,404 Views
1,334 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

GitLab

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

GitLab and UrbanCode Deploy compete in the DevOps space, with each offering distinct capabilities. GitLab seems to have the upper hand due to its strong CI/CD pipeline features enhancing code quality through branch management and peer reviews.

Features: GitLab emphasizes continuous integration and delivery capabilities with automated deployment, repository management, and robust pipelines. UrbanCode Deploy focuses on extensive plugin-based architecture, a server/agent model that automates various environments, and a strong toolset for complex deployments.

Room for Improvement: UrbanCode Deploy requires enhanced repository support, streamlined upgrades, and better reporting features. GitLab could improve integration with container management like AWS and focus on security enhancements. Both products may benefit from better plugin availability and integration enhancements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UrbanCode Deploy suits on-premises with customizable solutions but can be slow in issue resolution. GitLab supports various environments, offering flexibility and substantial help from its open-source community, though advanced support could improve.

Pricing and ROI: UrbanCode Deploy's cost scales with agents and servers, offering significant ROI through automation. GitLab, as an open-source solution, offers a cost-effective entry with appealing plans, although enterprise features might be costly, yet offering a competitive cost-to-value ratio.

To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,922 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitLab

Ranking in Release Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Build Automation (1st), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Rapid Application Development Software (10th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

UrbanCode Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of GitLab is 29.5%, down from 36.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UrbanCode Deploy is 4.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	29.5%
UrbanCode Deploy	4.6%
Other	65.9%

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is scalable."

"We use GitLab in the new project for CI/CD, integration, and deployment."

"GitLab helps me save time and provide financial benefits, as keeping track of the updated version and the changes is money and time-saving."

"Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective."

"The stability is good."

"It's a great toolbox where the CI/CD pipeline is the fundamental component, but there are so many other features that you can pull from, which makes it a very powerful tool. My current client is using AWS, and they can, of course, use AWS CodePipeline, but GitLab is much more mature than that, and it also gives you the freedom to decide to go to another platform or have a multi-cloud strategy and things like that. That freedom for me is also very valuable."

"It scales well."

"The merging feature makes it easy later on for the deployment."

More GitLab pros

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

Cons

"The solution could be faster."

"The documentation is confusing."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"Some of the scripts that we encountered in GitLab were not fully functional and threw up errors."

"There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

"This solution could be improved by adding modifications such as slack notifications."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"The tool should include a feature that helps to edit the code directly."

More GitLab cons

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"The price is okay."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"We are using the free version of GitLab."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

41%

Insurance Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient. Security-wise, we have security features enabled in GitLab fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 41% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 10% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 24% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 23% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 11% of the time

Spinnaker vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 6% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

October 2025

Download GitLab product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

October 2025

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

Fuzzit

uDeploy

Overview

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy

November 2025

Free Report: GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitLab vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.