"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"The conditional access policies that we set up are very useful."
"I like that we can implement conditional access."
"The initial setup is not overly complex or difficult."
"The solution is easy to use."
"For the price, the features included with Microsoft are appealing."
"The central administration con dashboard is very easy to use and provides very good oversight on all that needs to be monitored."
"The key benefit of Intune is its integration with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"The performance of Microsoft Intune is good."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"It would be better if I could integrate it with my core group policy. I would like to have a group policy in my current environment, which has strict control, but those things are still missing. Although it has maximum compliance and security, it's not available on-premise."
"They should make it easier to order it, however, that's generally true for everything from Microsoft."
"The most important thing is reporting. They should improve their reporting. They should give a free hand to users. In SCCM, I can create my own reports. For example, in SCCM, I can create an inventory report for my PC or for all PCs, but in Intune, we don't have an option to create any report. Microsoft claims that Intune is a successor of SCCM, but SCCM is more powerful than Intune. So, they should develop Intune more and make it equivalent to SCCM. Then, their product will be great in the market."
"Technical support is not that great."
"It just doesn't handle software updates well at all by itself. You need to be a scripting wizard to make those happen properly, or you use third-party tools. The Windows feature updates are very difficult to implement. I would like to see a proprietary built-in remote control tool. I know that they have Team Viewer integrated, but it is not seamless. It would be nice if they had a seamless remote desktop capability directly from the Intune console."
"In the next release, I would like a feature to be able to properly lock down the device. For example, if an attacker or somebody steals the phone, you can be sure that the pin cannot be broken."
"Reporting could be improved. It needs to be more expensive and robust."
More Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is ranked 17th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 65 reviews. Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Intune is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management writes "Highly stable, simple packages assigning, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "Unified endpoint management that has the flexibility of stand-alone components". Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management is most compared with ManageEngine Desktop Central, Ivanti Avalanche, Jamf Pro and VMware Workspace ONE, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Desktop Central, IBM MaaS360 and Google Cloud Identity.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
