Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

SAP Replication Server vs Tungsten RPA comparison

The compared SAP and Tungsten Automation solutions aren't in the same category. SAP is ranked #21 in DDM , with an average rating of 7.0, and holds a 1.5% mindshare in the category. Tungsten Automation is ranked #8 in RPA , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.
SAP Replication Server
Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews
  • 1,068 Views
  • 214 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Tungsten RPA
Read 26 Tungsten RPA reviews
  • 2,556 Views
  • 1,457 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between SAP Replication Server and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed SAP Replication Server vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
SAP Replication Server vs. Tungsten RPA
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 872,922 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SAP Replication Server
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Database Development and Management (21st), Data Integration (42nd)
Tungsten RPA
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

SAP Replication Server and Tungsten RPA aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAP Replication Server is designed for Database Development and Management and holds a mindshare of 1.5%, up 1.0% compared to last year.
Tungsten RPA, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 2.0% mindshare, down 2.1% since last year.
Database Development and Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
SAP Replication Server1.5%
SolarWinds Database Performance Analyzer5.7%
Redgate SQL Toolbelt Essentials5.6%
Other87.2%
Database Development and Management
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Tungsten RPA2.0%
Microsoft Power Automate16.5%
UiPath Platform16.3%
Other65.2%
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
 

Featured Reviews

Imran Rafi - PeerSpot reviewer
Foolproof stability and robust system
SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience. One of its notable features is real-time replication, which ensures that data changes are replicated immediately. This is particularly advantageous when we need to execute full processes promptly.
Read full review
Jamil Milhem - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection
I have worked with Microsoft Power Platform and UiPath. Kofax RPA offers a comprehensive solution with built-in capabilities for executing tasks like running Excel files and web automation without additional servers. They provide their browsers and extensions. For functions such as OCR, image processing, and data extraction, Kofax has built-in features powered by their engine, eliminating the need for subscriptions to external technologies like Microsoft Cognitive Services or Google Search. One of Kofax RPA's strongest features is its on-premise solution, which is particularly beneficial for organizations operating in regions with data regulations, such as the UAE.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"The product saves time and resources."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The tool's most valuable feature is web browser automation, which makes it easy to interact with any website. We can assemble a robot in a few hours with web automation, depending on its complexity."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
More Tungsten RPA pros
 

Cons

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We discussed this with Tungsten RPA, and they planned to add multi-attachment capability to their backlog. I'm not sure if it's been upgraded since then. The solution's desktop automation is tricker."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."
More Tungsten RPA cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a very expensive solution."
"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."
"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."
"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."
"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."
"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
"I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
"Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."
More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Retailer
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Replication Server?
It's a pretty good product and stable.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SAP Replication Server?
SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to repl...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SAP Replication Server?
It's basically to transfer data from one server to another. It's used for this purpose.
See all answers
What do you like most about Kofax RPA?
You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?
The pricing models across the market initially differed significantly, as most RPA implementations were licensed on a per bot basis, unlike Tungsten RPA, which uses a server-based model. Though the...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?
Automation of complex processes involving stable legacy systems could be a major plus. The biggest issue lies in the stability of the target environment. Automating systems based on Citrix, where u...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server Logo
Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server
Compared 22% of the time
Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server Logo
Qlik Replicate vs SAP Replication Server
Compared 21% of the time
Fivetran vs SAP Replication Server Logo
Fivetran vs SAP Replication Server
Compared 17% of the time
Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server Logo
Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server
Compared 13% of the time
Ignite ETI vs SAP Replication Server Logo
Ignite ETI vs SAP Replication Server
Compared 10% of the time
More SAP Replication Server Competitors
UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA Logo
UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA
Compared 43% of the time
Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA Logo
Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA
Compared 14% of the time
Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA Logo
Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA
Compared 11% of the time
Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA Logo
Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA
Compared 10% of the time
Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA Logo
Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA
Compared 6% of the time
More Tungsten RPA Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Database Development and Management
October 2025
SAP Replication Server reportDownload SAP Replication Server product report
Buyer's Guide
Tungsten RPA
October 2025
Tungsten RPA reportDownload Tungsten RPA product report
 

Also Known As

Sybase Replication Server
Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
 

Overview

Information and data-driven insight is what powers business today. But to get the most from your enterprise data, you need a way to bring transactional, streaming, social media, and other data together – regardless of its format and whether it’s structured or unstructured – and be able to analyze it. The challenge is moving, replicating, and centralizing a wide variety of data efficiently, cost-effectively, and quickly enough to meet business demands for active insight. SAP® Replication Server® can help. SAP Replication Server enables the continuous movement of mission-critical application data.

SAP
Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.
Tungsten Automation
 

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
Buyer's Guide
SAP Replication Server vs. Tungsten RPA
September 2025
Free Report: SAP Replication Server vs. Tungsten RPA
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Replication Server vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
872,922 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our SAP Replication Server vs. Tungsten RPA report.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.