Fivetran vs SAP Replication Server comparison

Fivetran and SAP are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAP is ranked #54. Fivetran holds a 1.9% mindshare in DI, compared to SAP’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

8,099 Views
5,183 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SAP Replication Server

Read 7 SAP Replication Server reviews

3,350 Views
1,876 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

SAP Replication Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAP Replication Server and Fivetran compete in the data replication and integration space. Fivetran appears to have an advantage due to its adaptable integration options and user-friendly experience.

Features: SAP Replication Server supports high-volume data replication, real-time data synchronization, and advanced data compression. Fivetran emphasizes easy integration with automatic schema detection and managed connectors for numerous data sources. SAP offers enterprise-level control, while Fivetran focuses on simplicity and automation.

Room for Improvement: SAP Replication Server could reduce technical expertise requirements and enhance user experience. Improving documentation and support accessibility may be beneficial. Fivetran may enhance data filtering capabilities, increase customization options, and refine real-time syncing features for larger datasets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP Replication Server requires significant technical expertise and support for deployment and maintenance. Fivetran, with its cloud-based model, offers simplified deployment without extensive technical prerequisites. Both platforms have reliable customer service, though Fivetran's straightforward onboarding and assistance processes provide ease for those requiring minimal deployment friction.

Pricing and ROI: SAP Replication Server involves higher upfront costs, justified by its enterprise-grade capabilities with potential for substantial long-term ROI in large environments. Fivetran offers a more accessible pricing model aligning with its simplified service, providing a quicker ROI through reduced setup complexity and ongoing maintenance. SAP demands high initial investment, whereas Fivetran's budget-friendly approach suits various organizational sizes.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (9th)

SAP Replication Server

Ranking in Data Integration

54th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 1.9%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Replication Server is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fivetran	1.9%
SAP Replication Server	0.9%
Other	97.2%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

GagandeepSingh3

Principal Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Good at handling replication, provides cross-database replication but SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies

SAP can provide better support for cross-database replication to newer technologies. The product supports Oracle, but I am not aware of what other technologies it supports. If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We would have to hire multiple data engineers to do what Fivetran does and each would cost us about $200,000 a year."

"Fivetran provides time savings, cost reductions, and improvements in data quality, and when the time investment decreases, fewer developers are needed, which means significant savings."

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"Overall, I would rate Fivetran nine out of ten."

More Fivetran pros

"It's pretty good at handling replication, even under high load. It also provides cross-database replication, for example, from Sybase to Oracle."

"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."

"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."

"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."

"This product has a catalog with the location of all the objects which were replicated, and it's very simple to maintain."

"We use this solution for all kinds of communications like RFC, BAPI, IDoc, connecting with the orders, accounts, finance, data stuff, banking, everything."

"The most valuable thing about this product is that it replicates data between SAP databases (ASE to IQ) very successfully."

"Currently, there is a Hadoop-based infrastructure with several engineers to maintain the data, and now, using SAP Replication Server, it has become automatic and requires fewer people to put data in the data warehouse."

More SAP Replication Server pros

Cons

"It can get expensive if you're sending a lot of data through Fivetran."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"If Fivetran can build in more transformations, that would be really helpful in my opinion."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

More Fivetran cons

"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."

"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."

"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."

"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."

"If someone wants to replicate their data from Sybase to a newer technology for data warehousing or other purposes, it would be better if they supported those."

"It's complex. It's necessary to understand a little about infrastructure, like network LAN and VLAN environment."

"Setup was a little complex."

"There is a need to improve performance in high transactional processes."

More SAP Replication Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is affordable."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"You can pick one of the hosted cloud services as opposed to owning it and doing it yourself. Your cost of ownership on the hardware, the data storage, and the maintenance all go down. It depends on what service you use."

"It's a very expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 3% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Oracle Enterprise Manager vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

Informatica PowerCenter vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 6% of the time

SSIS vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 5% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SAP Replication Server

Compared 2% of the time

More SAP Replication Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

August 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Database Development and Management

July 2026

Download SAP Replication Server product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase Replication Server

Overview

Fivetran offers a seamless, scalable data integration platform with strong connectors and real-time synchronization. Tailored for managing ETL workflows and integrating with DBT, it appeals to organizations seeking efficient data management.

Fivetran distinguishes itself through its intuitive interface and extensive scalability, allowing businesses to manage entire ETL workflows seamlessly. Its robust connectors ensure smooth integration with multiple data sources, while transparent logging and minimal coding requirements enhance accessibility. With real-time data synchronization, organizations benefit from up-to-date insights for analytics and engineering purposes. While some users point out areas for improvement like better documentation and expanded integration options, Fivetran remains a cherished tool for centralizing data in data warehouses such as supporting change data capture, migrations, and synchronizations from systems like Salesforce, NetSuite, and Google Analytics. Operating within an ELT framework, it empowers businesses to streamline data processes without complex extraction logic.

What are the key features of Fivetran?

Ease of Use: Intuitive platform minimizing setup complexity
Scalability: Adapt to growing data needs efficiently
Powerful Connectors: Seamless integration with diverse data sources
Real-Time Synchronization: Instant data updates supporting timely insights
DBT Integration: Simplifies transformations within ETL workflows
Transparent Logging: Provides clear visibility into operations

Which benefits can users expect in reviews?

Cost-Effective Scalability: Manage increased data without significant financial impact
Minimal Coding: Reduces technical barriers enhancing accessibility
Comprehensive Data Management: Centralizes diverse data streams effectively
Timely Analytics: Real-time updates foster actionable insights
Streamlined Workflow Management: Efficiently handles complex ETL processes

In industry-specific implementation, Fivetran is integral for businesses requiring robust data integration to power analytics. Retailers utilize it to consolidate e-commerce data for sales insights, while finance firms rely on its capabilities to merge financial data for reporting. In the tech sector, it supports engineering teams by providing a reliable data pipeline that fuels app development and performance monitoring.

Fivetran

SAP Replication Server offers enhanced data replication for SAP databases with customizable workflows, real-time updates, improved efficiency, and seamless integration with external tools, catering to both private and hybrid cloud solutions.

SAP Replication Server facilitates effective cross-database replication, including Sybase to Oracle, while enhancing performance with reduced storage use. Despite its robust reliability and beginner-friendly setup, areas such as high transactional processing and cross-database integration to newer technologies require improvement. Integration with HANA and addressing high private instance costs are necessary. The platform supports heterogeneous database communication and is a valuable asset in finance, banking, and analytics across platforms like AWS, Azure, and IBM.

What features does SAP Replication Server offer?

Customizable Workflows: Tailor workflows to meet business domain modeling needs.
Real-Time Replication: Ensure database updates are replicated instantly.
Cross-Database Support: Facilitate data movement between Sybase, Oracle, and more.
Warm Standby: Allows seamless read/write access during failover.
Easy Setup: Access beginner-friendly setup with comprehensive online resources.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage needs and enhances performance.
Robust Reliability: Ensures dependable data replication processes.
Cross-Platform Integration: Works well with modern platforms for a diverse tech stack.
Business Continuity: Maintains operations with features like Warm Standby.

Organizations in data analytics, finance, and banking sectors utilize SAP Replication Server to streamline database replication and communication, optimizing processes across AWS, Azure, and IBM. Employee data replication for payroll and business management is simplified, supporting hybrid cloud deployments.

SAP

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server

August 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. SAP Replication Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.