We performed a comparison between Oracle Enterprise Manager and SAP Replication Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use it extensively for performance tuning testing, monitoring, and configuration."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"The single-pane and single interface in the centralized system is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is high availability."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"The solution is easy to use and has good performance."
"We can manage everything in our environment."
"It's a useful feature to be able to see the top SQL, the number of executions, the CPU, and the resources that it's using."
"We can customize any workflow and we also like the business domain modeling that can be done."
"It speeds up the performance in terms of how fast you are able to access the data, look at it, get it reported to you, and send it to somebody. It also reduces the amount of storage."
"SAP Replication Server is an application that I consider to be a robust system. It has proven to be highly reliable in my experience."
"SAP is renovating different things. We are using external tools to connect as of now. It is going well, and now the new generation integration platforms are going to be pretty easy."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"The solution is considered expensive."
"It is complicated to run it on Google Chrome."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
"In my opinion, rather than a younger DBA, think the user interface could be improved."
"It needs to support the Database versions lower than 10.2."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"I would like to see it become mobile-friendly."
"The private solution is expensive. If you're in a situation where you're paying IBM or AWS or somebody just to host you specifically, you're paying people to run it and you're taking care of all the upgrades."
"Improvement is a never ending story, and HANA is doing some improvements. We are able to adopt that, and we have to do it by integration with HANA. They are very major changes that we need to see."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing and faster support."
Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews while SAP Replication Server is ranked 14th in Database Development and Management with 6 reviews. Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4, while SAP Replication Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Replication Server writes "Eliminates replication and allows you to use only one database, speeding up performance and reducing amount of storage". Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases, whereas SAP Replication Server is most compared with Qlik Replicate, Oracle GoldenGate, Fivetran, Azure Data Factory and SSIS. See our Oracle Enterprise Manager vs. SAP Replication Server report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.