Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jive vs Nomad Media comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 7, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jive
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
31st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Web Content Management (31st), Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) (7th), Enterprise Social Software (13th), Knowledge Management Software (16th), Enterprise Intranet (7th)
Nomad Media
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
19th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Digital Asset Management (21st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Jive is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nomad Media is 0.1%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Nomad Media0.1%
Jive0.7%
Other99.2%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

GD
VP - International Business at Amtex S.A.
A flexible solution that improves our administrative efficiency
We use Jive-n for followups on details regarding purchase orders, shipping documents, and other information We are able to handle more than one hundred POs at any given time with their shipping docs and info, with only one person in charge. This solution provides great flexibility of permission…
reviewer2784540 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Application Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Integrates cloud workflows with databases and has revealed areas we still want to explore
The best features Nomad offers directly integrate with AWS, which is useful for us. The database link feature helps my team because we have a lot of database linking. Nomad has positively impacted my organization as it is still in an evaluation phase, so I cannot comment on that right now. I have early signs and expectations that Nomad might improve efficiency.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8925 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer with 51-200 employees
Aug 23, 2013
Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a…
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nomad Media?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is with the infrastructure team, and I asked them to set it up for us, so I do not know how much it cost.
What needs improvement with Nomad Media?
Nomad can be improved, but so far we have not seen scope for improvement, so we will continue our evaluation. I do not want to add more about the needed improvements, even if it is just a wish list...
What is your primary use case for Nomad Media?
My main use case for Nomad is thinking, and we are planning to use it to enrich distributed media content in our company.
 

Also Known As

Clearspace, Jive SBS, Jive Engage, Jive-x, Jive-n
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Eloqua, Hitachi Data Systems,T-Mobile, UBM, Thomson-Reuters, Groupon, Nike, Cisco, and others.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Jive vs. Nomad Media and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.