Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

"The Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence's most valuable feature is simplicity. When deployed in our environment, the standout aspect is the ease of installation across different offices. For example, in a location with 150 users, we only need to install the agent on one machine. From there, it scans the entire network, identifying components on computers, laptops, desktops, and more. We can view the results and easily push updates."

"Tenable Vulnerability Management is the backbone of our vulnerability management and has affected my organization positively."

"The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good."

"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

"The vulnerability management itself is the most valuable feature as well as references to the mitigation techniques."

"The ease of use in terms of scanning assets is valuable."

"The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status."

"The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options."

"Ivanti Neurons for Patch Intelligence needs to improve reporting."

"I would rate it four out of ten. For startups, freelancers, or companies between startup and midsize, Tenable is recommended. However, for midsize or enterprise-level companies, I would not prefer it."

"I'd like to see them improve their support."

"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."

"It can have more integration."

"The solution must be promoted more in the market."

"They need to have more dependable and faster support."

"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons."

"The UI has room for improvement."

"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

"The product costs us around $137,000 annually for 4000 to 5000 assets."

"The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."

"Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."

"The tool is reasonably priced."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"The cost is determined by the number of endpoints, which is approximately one dollar per endpoint."

"Yearly payments are to be made toward the licensing cost of the product. It is neither a cheap nor an expensive product."