Tenable Security Center vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Tenable Security Center is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.9. Tenable Security Center holds a 4.5% mindshare in VM, compared to Tenable Vulnerability Management’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Tenable Security Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Tenable Vulnerability Management users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

Tenable Security Center and Tenable Vulnerability Management compete in the category of vulnerability management tools. Tenable Vulnerability Management has the upper hand due to its flexible deployment options and broad asset coverage, offering advanced features like Vulnerability Priority Ratings.

Features: Tenable Security Center is recognized for its comprehensive vulnerability scanning, robust dashboards, and the Assurance Report Card, which provides an overview of security posture. Its customizable scanning policies allow flexibility in network environments. Tenable Vulnerability Management's strengths lie in its flexibility, predictive prioritization, and extensive integration capabilities, enabling it to effectively manage diverse IT environments.

Room for Improvement: Tenable Security Center needs enhancements in integration, reporting customization, and policy management. Users face challenges in extracting insightful reports and managing vulnerability acceptance on a large scale. Tenable Vulnerability Management requires improved reporting customization, automated patching features, and a more intuitive user interface to better suit SMB needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center is primarily on-premises with limited hybrid options and receives positive feedback for customer support, though it varies by region. Tenable Vulnerability Management offers flexible deployment across public, private, and hybrid clouds. It is praised for its support structure that meets diverse deployment needs, though some suggest faster responses.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center is often viewed as expensive compared to competitors like Rapid7, but its feature set provides a significant ROI by reducing labor costs and mitigating security breaches. Tenable Vulnerability Management, while also costly, offers worthwhile investments through security insights and automation capabilities. Users suggest pricing adjustments for greater accessibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.8%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 4.5%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Vulnerability Management is 5.4%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

OndrejKOVAC

Solution engineer at EXPERTience

Empower clients with risk-based vulnerability management through continuous workflow and valuable insights

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into European languages. This is especially relevant in Central Eastern Europe, where clients often require reports in local languages. Additionally, the licensing model could be more flexible for managed security providers, similar to a pay-as-you-go model.

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Streamlines vulnerability management with excellent reporting and potential AI integration

Tenable is user-friendly and excels in reporting. It allows me to easily fetch and schedule reports. The software's discovery feature aids in strengthening our security posture. The single-sensor installation process on various operating systems is smooth, unlike Rapid7, which requires different versions for separate systems. Furthermore, Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We saw benefits from Zafran Security almost immediately after deploying it."

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Overall, we have seen about eighty-seven percent reduction of the number of vulnerabilities that require urgency to remediate, specifically the number of criticals."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."

"Has a great advanced scanning feature."

"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."

"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."

"The scans are the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Tenable.sc is user-friendly."

"The solution is very intuitive and the dashboards are simple to use."

"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."

More Tenable Security Center pros

"The dashboard is pretty intuitive, and it lets you do a drill-down analysis of each vulnerability. That is something that brings a lot of value to the organization."

"Tenable Vulnerability Management is the backbone of our vulnerability management and has affected my organization positively."

"It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."

"One of the most valuable features of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is its exportability, which allows us to conduct risk assessments efficiently."

"It's a recommended tool for penetration testers because it's effective for that purpose."

"The solution is very simple to use."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pros

Cons

"I think the ability to have some enhanced reporting capabilities is something they can improve on, as they have good reports but we have asked for some specific reporting enhancements."

"The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvements."

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"Tenable's technical support has declined in quality over time. While they used to be excellent, achieving ratings of eight or nine, they now rate around six or seven due to longer response times and less thorough assistance."

"The web application scanning area can be improved."

"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"

"It's good at creating information, it's good creating dashboards, it's good at creating reports, but if you want to take that reporting metadata and put it into another tool, that is a little bit lacking."

"The GUI could be improved to have all concerns and priorities use the same GUI, allowing them to see all tickets, assign vulnerabilities, and assign variation failures to each member of their team."

"The solution is expensive."

"Deploying Tenable.sc is highly complex because it's an on-prem solution, whereas Tenable.io is cloud-based, so you can go live as soon as you log in. Tenable.sc involves significant integration with other on-prem solutions, and the deployment takes about two to three weeks with the help of a system integrator"

"Certain aspects require manual effort, such as exporting and analyzing data for our dashboards. The built-in components of the Tenable solution are somewhat clumsy that require external tools. So, this is an area of improvement."

More Tenable Security Center cons

"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."

"I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure."

"I would rate it four out of ten. For startups, freelancers, or companies between startup and midsize, Tenable is recommended. However, for midsize or enterprise-level companies, I would not prefer it."

"I don't recommend Tenable.io Vulnerability Management for web scanning"

"More flexibility is required compared to other solutions."

"The reporting was never great in Tenable Vulnerability Management, so, in my company, we imported all the data into Ivanti RiskSense to start using it for reporting."

"It would be helpful if Tenable could be more clear with regard to everything the solution can and cannot do with the particular license that you have."

"There needs to be better dashboard navigation."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The licensing costs for this solution are approximately $100,000 US, and I think that covers everything."

"The tool provides competitive pricing."

"Tenable SC is priced per asset, with the basic solution starting around US$12,000 for 500 assets."

"It is a bit expensive. Everything is included in the license."

"I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing."

"It is slightly more expensive than other solutions in the same sphere."

"Costing is pretty reasonable compared to the competition."

"Tenable is open-source."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

"A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."

"Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."

"There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."

"The solution is not too expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."

"Tenable charges around $40 per device."

"Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."

"I would rate the pricing a five out of ten. It is in the middle."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

The current pricing of Zafran Security is fair overall. They were good to work with to accommodate our organization w...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

The dashboarding and reporting functionality of Zafran Security is an area that definitely could use some improvement...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

Zafran Security is helping reduce the amount of critical vulnerabilities in our environments that require prompt reme...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center is quite expensive, particularly for the CEE region, causing us to lose cases due to its pric...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

Tenable Security Center could improve by implementing more dynamic data displays and translating reports into Europea...

See all answers

What's the difference between Tenable Nessus and Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

The tool has an easy-to-use interface.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Vulnerability Management?

I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io. My current client doesn't have access to it. Howeve...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 42% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 16% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

Nucleus vs Zafran Security

Compared 7% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 12% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

The NodeZero Platform vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Tenable Vulnerability Management

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

June 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

June 2025

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Vulnerability Management

June 2025

Download Tenable Vulnerability Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Tenable.io

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Global Payments AU/NZ

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

May 2025

Free Report: Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Tenable Security Center vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors and best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.