Iron Mountain Connect vs Teradata comparison

Iron Mountain and Teradata are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Iron Mountain is ranked #66, while Teradata is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Iron Mountain holds a 0.5% mindshare in BRS, compared to Teradata’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Iron Mountain users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Teradata users who would recommend it.

Iron Mountain Connect

Read 2 Iron Mountain Connect reviews

639 Views
607 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Teradata

Read 77 Teradata reviews

10,160 Views
305 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Iron Mountain Connect

Teradata

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 30, 2025

Teradata and Iron Mountain Connect operate in the business intelligence and data management market, each with distinct strengths. Teradata has the upper hand in data management due to its analytical capabilities, while Iron Mountain Connect excels in security and compliance.

Features: Teradata is known for high-performance analytics, scalable database solutions, and its ability to handle complex queries. Iron Mountain Connect focuses on document management, secure data storage, and compliance-centric solutions tailored for security-sensitive industries.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Teradata offers a comprehensive deployment model suited for large-scale environments with robust customer service for implementation support. Iron Mountain Connect emphasizes a simpler deployment process focused on security infrastructure, providing quick integration with customer service dedicated to data protection solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata's significant setup costs yield substantial ROI for businesses needing deep insights, while Iron Mountain Connect's straightforward pricing and lower costs appeal to companies prioritizing security over extensive analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Iron Mountain Connect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

66th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Data Integration (17th), Relational Databases Tools (8th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (13th), Marketing Management (5th), Cloud Data Warehouse (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Iron Mountain Connect is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Teradata	0.3%
Iron Mountain Connect	0.5%
Other	99.2%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Raj Bhaduri

Enterprise architect at Centrica

Good policies related to data

I primarily use it for various policies related to data, such as data retention, data deletion, and archiving policies. All policies can be set using this system The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities. I would like to see more integration with different platforms,…

Read full review

Kirk Robinson

Interim and Fractional CIO and CTO at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Has improved data quality, optimized reporting processes, and enabled predictive insights across business units

The limitation we encountered was related to speed, prompting us to increase our AWS cloud thresholds and benchmarks on the servers, adding more throughput. We have been testing that, but speed remains one of our key issues. The integration has been awesome because of the platforms and their usage, and usability is great. The most challenging aspect is finding Teradata resources, so we are focusing on internal training and looking for more Teradata experts. If Teradata could provide a list of certified experts, that would be fantastic. I rated Teradata a nine because the main area for improvement is the bandwidth of resources that could assist us in applying to our projects, specifically more certified and expert resources. The market share of Teradata professionals is limited, creating an issue for us.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"

"I've never had any issues with scalability."

"Improved performance of ETL procedures, reporting."

"It has massive parallel processing ability to do large amounts of concurrent querying."

"It is a solid database a lot of different tools to move data."

"Designing the database is easy."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the warehousing model."

"Teradata features high productivity and reliability because it has several redundancy options, so the system is always up and running."

"Viewpoint, the detailed query logs and performance statistics are valuable features."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"From my perspective, it would be good if they gave better ITIN/R plugins to use the data for AI modeling, or data science modeling. We can do it now; however, it could be more elegant in terms of interfacing."

"I would like more security and speed."

"It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI."

"Data synchronization to the DR site."

"The initial setup is complex because there are a lot of factors that come into play, including the amount of software and applications that require access."

"Teradata should focus on functionality for building predictive models because, in that regard, it can definitely improve."

"The capability to implement it with comparable performance across various private cloud environments, ensuring adaptability to different infrastructure setups would be beneficial."

"The limitation we encountered was related to speed, prompting us to increase our AWS cloud thresholds and benchmarks on the servers, adding more throughput."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Price is quite high, so if it is really possible to use other solutions (e.g. you do not have strict requirements for performance and huge data volumes), it might be better to look at alternatives from the RDBMS world."

"The tool costs about 30,000 euros a month, while Azure Synapse SQL only costs 10,000."

"It's a very expensive product."

"We had a lot of parties involved when purchasing from the AWS Marketplace. They are very flexible and aggressive in trying to close the deal. They are good at what they have to offer and listening to the customer. It's a two-way street."

"Teradata used to be expensive, but they have been lowering their prices."

"The solution requires a license."

"The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space."

"In this day and age, we want to get things done quickly. So, we go to the AWS Marketplace."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Legal Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

See all answers

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

See all answers

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Igneous DataProtect vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 22% of the time

MSP360 Backup vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 19% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 19% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 13% of the time

More Iron Mountain Connect Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Analytics Database (Vertica) vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2025

Download Iron Mountain Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Teradata

September 2025

Download Teradata product report

Also Known As

No data available

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture, Teradata Vantage Enterprise (DIY)

Overview

Connected Accounting&ERP is a mid-range accounting program with single user and network editions for Macintosh and Windows operating systems. Connected can be shared concurrently by both Mac OS and Windows users on a single data file. Connected "Core Accounting" consists of the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable modules. Connected "Enterprise" builds on the Core Accounting aspects by adding powerful inventory, job costing, and currency additions. Pricing starts at $399.00.

Iron Mountain

Teradata is a powerful tool for handling substantial data volumes with its parallel processing architecture, supporting both cloud and on-premise environments efficiently. It offers impressive capabilities for fast query processing, data integration, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications.

Known for its robust parallel processing capabilities, Teradata effectively manages large datasets and provides adaptable deployment across cloud and on-premise setups. It enhances performance and scalability with features like advanced query tuning, workload management, and strong security. Users appreciate its ease of use and automation features which support real-time data reporting. The optimizer and intelligent partitioning help improve query speed and efficiency, while multi-temperature data management optimizes data handling.

What are the key features of Teradata?

Parallel Processing Architecture: Enables efficient handling of substantial data volumes.
Cloud and On-Premise Deployment: Offers seamless adaptability across environments.
Query Tuning: Improves speed and performance of data retrieval processes.
Workload Management: Ensures optimal resource allocation for enhanced performance.
Robust Security: Provides high levels of data protection and system integrity.
Data Integration: Facilitates cohesive data management from multiple sources.
Automation for Real-time Reporting: Enhances timely data insights and decision-making.
Optimizer and Intelligent Partitioning: Further increase query speed and system efficiency.
Multi-Temperature Data Management: Optimizes the handling and retrieval of data.

What benefits and ROI do users look for?

Efficient Data Management: Facilitates smooth integration and processing of diverse data sets.
Scalability: Easy adjustment to increasing or decreasing data requirements.
Improved Performance: Fast query speeds and optimized resource use.
Comprehensive Security: Safeguards data integrity and accessibility.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data handling and operational processes.

In the finance, retail, and government sectors, Teradata is employed for data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytical processing. It handles vast datasets for activities like customer behavior modeling and enterprise data integration. Supporting efficient reporting and analytics, Teradata enhances data storage and processing, whether deployed on-premise or on cloud platforms.

Teradata

Sample Customers

University of La Verne

Netflix

Buyer's Guide

Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata

September 2025

Free Report: Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata

Find out what your peers are saying about Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.