Iron Mountain Connect vs Teradata comparison

Iron Mountain and Teradata are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Iron Mountain is ranked #62, while Teradata is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.7. Iron Mountain holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to Teradata’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Iron Mountain users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Teradata users who would recommend it.

Iron Mountain Connect

Read 2 Iron Mountain Connect reviews

939 Views
911 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Teradata

Read 83 Teradata reviews

10,773 Views
646 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Iron Mountain Connect

Teradata

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 4, 2026

Teradata and Iron Mountain Connect are strong contenders in the data management domain. Teradata has an edge with its data management functions, but Iron Mountain Connect excels in document management. Teradata is viewed as more cost-effective compared to Iron Mountain Connect, despite the latter's comprehensive features.

Features: Teradata offers high-performing analytics, advanced data processing, and cost-effectiveness. Iron Mountain Connect stands out for secure document storage, easy access to records, and comprehensive document management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Iron Mountain Connect ensures streamlined deployment and attentive customer service. Teradata's deployment can be more complex, requiring extensive assistance, with users finding Iron Mountain's support more accessible.

Pricing and ROI: Teradata has an attractive initial setup cost with quick ROI due to its analytics capabilities, while Iron Mountain Connect, despite higher upfront costs, provides lasting value through its document management features.

To learn more, read our detailed Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Iron Mountain Connect

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

62nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Teradata

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Customer Experience Management (6th), Data Integration (15th), Relational Databases Tools (6th), Data Warehouse (3rd), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (8th), Marketing Management (5th), Cloud Data Warehouse (3rd), Database Management Systems (DBMS) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Iron Mountain Connect is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Teradata is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Teradata	0.5%
Iron Mountain Connect	0.7%
Other	98.8%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Raj Bhaduri

Enterprise architect at Centrica

Good policies related to data

I primarily use it for various policies related to data, such as data retention, data deletion, and archiving policies. All policies can be set using this system The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities. I would like to see more integration with different platforms,…

Read full review

David Durand Velásquez

Engineers at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

Delivers consistent performance and enables advanced analytics across complex data environments

Teradata stands out as a solid platform for managing and analyzing large volumes of data. Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in highly demanding environments. One of its most notable strengths is the ability to run complex queries at high speed, which is essential for organizations that require timely and reliable analytics. Teradata offers a well-integrated ecosystem that supports working with different types of data and enables scalability as organizational needs grow. Its focus on advanced analytics, integration with modern business intelligence tools, and the ability to operate both on-premise and in the cloud make it a versatile solution for data warehousing and large-scale processing. Teradata's stability, technological maturity, and the availability of strong documentation and best practices are noteworthy. I consider Teradata to be a tool with great potential for any organization looking to enhance its analytical capabilities, optimize data processing, and move toward more data-driven decision-making. Teradata stands out as a solid platform for managing a large volume of data in different projects. Its architecture allows information to be processed efficiently while maintaining stable performance, even in high-demanding environments. A well-integrated AI ecosystem that supports working with different types of data and enables scalability as organizational needs grow across different kinds of enterprises or organizations. The focus on advanced analytics integration with modern business intelligence tools is particularly valuable. Teradata combines a powerful parallel process and optimizing SQL engine with a highly scalable architecture allowing businesses to execute complex queries and analytics in real-time. It supports multi-cloud, hybrid, and on-premise environments, giving organizations flexibility to choose the setup that best aligns with their strategy. One of the biggest strengths is the ability to unify disparate data sources and support high concurrency, enabling different teams, such as analytics, operations, BI, and data science, to access consistent, trusted data across the enterprise.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"

"We did performance testing. We had a set of real life MicroStrategy reports. Our conditions were: Not allowed to redesign data model, not allowed to rewrite the queries, all queries should be generated by MicroStrategy, no aggregates. Teradata appeared to be way faster than a similarly configured (in terms of hardware) Oracle server."

"The product's scalability is great. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Teradata's best feature is its speed with historical data."

"The ability to handle machine data parallel processing is the most valuable feature of Teradata."

"The key advantages are Performance when processing Terabytes of data and scalability."

"It has given our business the ability to gain insights into the data and create data labs for analysis and PoCs."

"Teradata has positively impacted our organization by allowing our team to reduce from 27 people down to eight, consolidating our headcount, and helping the enterprise achieve a higher rate of internal return on financials."

"A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts."

More Teradata pros

Cons

"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."

"I would not say it was very performance efficient, but it was definitely good."

"The tool's flexibility and capacity for expansion are areas of concern where improvements are required."

"The solution needs improvement in its stability, support and pricing."

"We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata."

"I'm not sure about the unstructured data management capabilities. It could be improved."

"Data ingestion is done via external utilities and not by the query language itself. It would be more convenient to have that functionality within its SQL dialect."

"Data synchronization to the DR site."

"The initial setup is complex because there are a lot of factors that come into play, including the amount of software and applications that require access."

More Teradata cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Teradata is not cheap, but you get what you pay for."

"Teradata is expensive but gives value for money, especially if you don't want to move your data to the cloud."

"The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space."

"In the past, it turned out that other solutions, in order to provide the full range of abilities that the Teradata platform provides plus the migration costs, would end up costing more than Teradata does."

"I am using the free version of Teradata."

"The price of Teradata is expensive. However, what they deliver they are outstanding. If you're looking for an inexpensive solution to run a database, this isn't your tool. It's the Ferrari of databases for data warehousing."

"Teradata is expensive, so it's typically marketed to big customers. However, there have been some changes, and Teradata is now offering more flexible pricing models and equipment leasing. They've added pay-as-you-go and cloud models, so it's changing, but Teradata is generally known as an expensive high-end product."

"The cost of running Teradata is quite high, but you get a good return on investment."

More Teradata pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user232068

Senior Data Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 5, 2015

Netezza vs. Teradata

Original published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/should-i-choose-net Two leading Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architectures for Data Warehousing (DW) are IBM PureData System for Analytics (formerly Netezza) and Teradata. I thought talking about the similarities and differences…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparing Teradata and Oracle Database, which product do you think is better and why?

I have spoken to my colleagues about this comparison and in our collective opinion, the reason why some people may declare Teradata better than Oracle is the pricing. Both solutions are quite simi...

See all answers

Which companies use Teradata and who is it most suitable for?

Before my organization implemented this solution, we researched which big brands were using Teradata, so we knew if it would be compatible with our field. According to the product's site, the comp...

See all answers

Is Teradata a difficult solution to work with?

Teradata is not a difficult product to work with, especially since they offer you technical support at all levels if you just ask. There are some features that may cause difficulties - for example,...

See all answers

Comparisons

Igneous DataProtect vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 15% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 13% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 11% of the time

MSP360 Backup vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 11% of the time

Barracuda Backup vs Iron Mountain Connect

Compared 8% of the time

More Iron Mountain Connect Competitors

Oracle Exadata vs Teradata

Compared 7% of the time

Snowflake vs Teradata

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Database vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

SQL Server vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Teradata

Compared 5% of the time

More Teradata Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

January 2026

Download Iron Mountain Connect product report

Buyer's Guide

Teradata

January 2026

Download Teradata product report

Also Known As

No data available

IntelliFlex, Aster Data Map Reduce, , QueryGrid, Customer Interaction Manager, Digital Marketing Center, Data Mover, Data Stream Architecture, Teradata Vantage Enterprise (DIY)

Overview

Connected Accounting&ERP is a mid-range accounting program with single user and network editions for Macintosh and Windows operating systems. Connected can be shared concurrently by both Mac OS and Windows users on a single data file. Connected "Core Accounting" consists of the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable modules. Connected "Enterprise" builds on the Core Accounting aspects by adding powerful inventory, job costing, and currency additions. Pricing starts at $399.00.

Iron Mountain

Teradata is a powerful tool for handling substantial data volumes with its parallel processing architecture, supporting both cloud and on-premise environments efficiently. It offers impressive capabilities for fast query processing, data integration, and real-time reporting, making it suitable for diverse industrial applications.

Known for its robust parallel processing capabilities, Teradata effectively manages large datasets and provides adaptable deployment across cloud and on-premise setups. It enhances performance and scalability with features like advanced query tuning, workload management, and strong security. Users appreciate its ease of use and automation features which support real-time data reporting. The optimizer and intelligent partitioning help improve query speed and efficiency, while multi-temperature data management optimizes data handling.

What are the key features of Teradata?

Parallel Processing Architecture: Enables efficient handling of substantial data volumes.
Cloud and On-Premise Deployment: Offers seamless adaptability across environments.
Query Tuning: Improves speed and performance of data retrieval processes.
Workload Management: Ensures optimal resource allocation for enhanced performance.
Robust Security: Provides high levels of data protection and system integrity.
Data Integration: Facilitates cohesive data management from multiple sources.
Automation for Real-time Reporting: Enhances timely data insights and decision-making.
Optimizer and Intelligent Partitioning: Further increase query speed and system efficiency.
Multi-Temperature Data Management: Optimizes the handling and retrieval of data.

What benefits and ROI do users look for?

Efficient Data Management: Facilitates smooth integration and processing of diverse data sets.
Scalability: Easy adjustment to increasing or decreasing data requirements.
Improved Performance: Fast query speeds and optimized resource use.
Comprehensive Security: Safeguards data integrity and accessibility.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data handling and operational processes.

In the finance, retail, and government sectors, Teradata is employed for data warehousing, business intelligence, and analytical processing. It handles vast datasets for activities like customer behavior modeling and enterprise data integration. Supporting efficient reporting and analytics, Teradata enhances data storage and processing, whether deployed on-premise or on cloud platforms.

Teradata

Sample Customers

University of La Verne

Netflix

Buyer's Guide

Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata

December 2025

Free Report: Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata

Find out what your peers are saying about Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Iron Mountain Connect vs. Teradata report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.