Invicti vs Seeker Interactive comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Invicti and Black Duck are both solutions in the API Security category. Invicti is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5, while Black Duck is ranked #23. Invicti holds a 3.9% mindshare in APIS, compared to Black Duck’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Black Duck users who would recommend it.

Invicti

Read 31 Invicti reviews

8,384 Views
1,174 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Seeker Interactive

Read 1 Seeker Interactive review

1,604 Views
577 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Invicti

Seeker Interactive

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 22, 2026

Invicti and Seeker Interactive compete in the application security space. Seeker Interactive appears to have an advantage due to its integration ease and intelligent analytics.

Features: Invicti includes automated scanning, extensive web application vulnerability coverage, and reliable performance. Seeker Interactive offers dynamic application security testing, advanced risk assessment, and proactive reporting.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Invicti features straightforward deployment and effective customer support. Seeker Interactive offers comprehensive onboarding services and automation options.

Pricing and ROI: Invicti has competitive pricing with good ROI through vulnerability coverage. Seeker Interactive, although more expensive, provides significant long-term benefits with superior risk management.

To learn more, read our detailed API Security Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

API Security

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Invicti

Ranking in API Security

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (15th), Container Security (32nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (16th), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (5th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)

Seeker Interactive

Ranking in API Security

23rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Internet Security (16th), Mobile Threat Defense (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the API Security category, the mindshare of Invicti is 3.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seeker Interactive is 2.1%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

API Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Invicti	3.9%
Seeker Interactive	2.1%
Other	94.0%

API Security

Featured Reviews

PrashantUppuluri

Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Automated scanning has strengthened web application security and supports hybrid protection

A good scanning engine is what I appreciate about Invicti. When you want to find out the vulnerabilities within your web applications, Invicti has done a thorough job with respect to filtering out the vulnerabilities and identifying the risk factors with respect to the security modules within the solution. Invicti does have a segment of the solution which works on the automated scanning engine. As long as the license is active, the scanners that work within the solution are pretty effective. With respect to SAST and DAST, being a real-time scanning engine is one of the portfolios and one of the selling factors of the solution. Invicti is known to be a solution that works within the hybrid environment, be it cloud, on-premises, or a mix and match across multiple marketplaces. It does a thorough job. Most importantly, Invicti is a very good SAST and DAST solution that is very competitive in the market with respect to competitors. Invicti is a part of the Magic Quadrant with respect to Gartner's Magic Quadrant and has made a very good customer database and pipeline within the marketplace locally. With respect to security impacts in terms of support, Invicti is pretty much supportive. With respect to use cases or the POCs I have run on the solution, we have identified a couple of vulnerabilities and Invicti was able to trace them, detect, and quarantine the attacks.

Read full review

San K

Senior Group Leader at Infosys

More effective than dynamic scanners, but is missing useful learning capabilities

One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues. However, the criteria that you set initially is not something that all applications are going to need. The purposes for which applications are designed may differ in practice in the industry, and because of this, there will always be tools that sometimes report false positives. Thus, there should be some means with which I can customize the way that Seeker learns about our applications, possibly by using some kind of AI / ML capability within the tool that will automatically reduce the number of false positives that we get as we use the tool over time. Obviously, when we first start using the scanning tool there will be false positives, but as it keeps going and as I keep using the tool, there should be a period of time where either the application can learn how to ignore false positives, or I can customize it do so. Adding this type of functionality would definitely prevent future issues when it comes to reporting false positives, and this is a key area that we have already asked the vendor to improve on, in general. On a different note, there is one feature that isn't completely available right now where you can integrate Seeker with an open-source vulnerability scanner or composition analysis tool such as Black Duck. I would very much like this capability to be available to us out-of-the-box, so that we can easily integrate with tools like Black Duck in such a way that any open source components that are used in the front-end are easily identified. I think this would be a huge plus for Seeker. Another feature within Seeker which could benefit from improvement is active verification, which lets you actively verify a vulnerability. This feature currently doesn't work in certain applications, particularly in scenarios where you have requested tokens. When we bought the tool, we didn't realize this and we were not told about it by the vendor, so initially it was a big challenge for us to overcome it and properly begin our deployment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Invicti's best feature is the ability to identify vulnerabilities and manually verify them."

"It has a comprehensive resulting mechanism. It is a one-stop solution for all your security testing mechanisms."

"Invicti is part of our SSDLC portfolio, and DAST dynamic testing is very important for our web applications and portfolios."

"I am impressed with Invictus’ proof-based scanning. The solution has reduced the incidence of false positive vulnerabilities. It has helped us reduce our time and focus on vulnerabilities."

"The best features of Invicti are its ability to confirm access vulnerabilities, SSL injection vulnerabilities, and its connectors to other security tools."

"Scan, proxify the application, and then detailed report along with evidence and remediations to problems."

"I would definitely recommend it to those who really want to know in-depth details of their applications/products regarding security."

"Crawling feature: Netsparker has very detail crawling steps and mechanisms. This feature expands the attack surface."

More Invicti pros

"A significant advantage of Seeker is that it is an interactive scanner, and we have found it to be much more effective in reducing the amount of false positives than dynamic scanners such as AppScan, Micro Focus Fortify, etc., and furthermore, with Seeker, we are finding more and more valid (i.e. "true") positives over time compared with the dynamic scanners."

Cons

"Improvement could be made in the area of production."

"Invicti's reporting capabilities need enhancement. We need enterprise-level information instead of repo-level details. Unlike Appiro, Invicti does not provide portfolio-level insights into vulnerability remediation over time."

"They need to improve their support in the documentation. Their support mechanism is missing. Their responsiveness, technical staff, and these types of things need to be improved, and comprehensive documentation is required. They should have good self-service portal enhancement"

"The solution's false positive analysis and vulnerability analysis libraries could be improved."

"Netsparker doesn't provide the source code of the static application security testing."

"The scanner itself should be improved because it is a little bit slow."

"Sometimes, it is slow; when we are running this application and browsing other applications concurrently, it makes other applications work slow."

"They could enhance the support for data swap testing for the platform."

More Invicti cons

"All in all, the enterprise server installation is very easy and straightforward, but with the agent installation you might face problems up to 50% of the time for a variety of reasons, depending on what type of application is involved, the type of deployment used, and so on."

"One area that Seeker can improve is to make it more customizable. All security scanning tools have a defined set of rules that are based on certain criteria which they will use to detect issues. However, the criteria that you set initially is not something that all applications are going to need."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using an NFR license and I do not know the exact price of the NFR license. I think 20 FQDN for three years would cost around 35,000 US Dollars."

"I think that price it too high, like other Security applications such as Acunetix, WebInspect, and so on."

"The solution is very expensive. It comes with a yearly subscription. We were paying 6000 dollars yearly for unlimited scans. We have three licenses; basic, business, and ultimate. We need ultimate because it has unlimited scan numbers."

"We never had any issues with the licensing; the price was within our assigned limits."

"Netsparker is one of the costliest products in the market. It would help if they could allow us to scan multiple URLs on the same license."

"The price should be 20% lower"

"It is competitive in the security market."

"Invicti is best suited for large enterprises. I don't think small and medium-sized businesses can afford it. Maintenance costs aren't that great."

More Invicti pricing and cost advice

"The licensing for Seeker is user-based and for 50 users I believe it costs about $70,000 per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

19%

Government

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netsparker Web Application Security Scanner?

The setup cost is pretty competitive. For example, if you want to talk about the SAST license, it comes to about $150 or sometimes less than $100, depending on the conversion or the number of licen...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Invicti?

At this time, there is nothing that comes to mind. However, most of the products in the market are pretty much neck-to-neck competitors. Speaking about it, there are a couple of factors which they ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Invicti?

I have worked on a couple of products, specifically in web application security. I have worked on Invicti, and with respect to PAM, I have worked with BeyondTrust. I have not worked specifically fo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Veracode vs Invicti

Compared 7% of the time

Invicti Web + API vs Invicti

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Invicti

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Invicti

Compared 4% of the time

More Invicti Competitors

Checkmarx One vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 16% of the time

Operant AI vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 15% of the time

SonarQube vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 8% of the time

Contrast Security Assess vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 8% of the time

iVerify vs Seeker Interactive

Compared 7% of the time

More Seeker Interactive Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Invicti

October 2026

Download Invicti product report

Buyer's Guide

Internet Security

October 2026

Download Seeker Interactive product report

Also Known As

Netsparker

No data available

Overview

Invicti offers advanced web application security testing focused on identifying vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting. Its Proof-Based Scanning minimizes false positives and integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, making it an effective tool for enterprise environments.

Invicti provides comprehensive scanning capabilities that include detecting and verifying critical vulnerabilities and security data consolidation. Its scalable scanning engine and robust API support allow for flexible testing across diverse environments, including web and API testing. Despite some drawbacks like limited single sign-on integration and slow scanning speeds for large applications, Invicti remains a popular choice for automating security assessments, ensuring compliance with standards like OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, and GDPR.

What are the key features of Invicti?

Comprehensive Vulnerability Scanning: Detects vulnerabilities like SQL injection and XSS.
Proof-Based Scanning: Confirms exploitability and reduces false positives.
CI/CD Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development pipelines.
Security Data Consolidation: Centralizes data for better insights.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy analysis and reporting.
Scalable Scanning Engine: Supports testing in enterprise environments.
Robust API Support: Enhances flexibility in testing.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Proactive Security: Actively identifies and verifies vulnerabilities to prevent breaches.
Regulatory Compliance: Helps maintain compliance with standards like PCI DSS and GDPR.
Efficient Vulnerability Management: Aids in prioritizing remediation efforts.
Integration Capabilities: Streamlines processes with CI/CD pipeline compatibility.

In industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce, Invicti is implemented to bolster security through automated vulnerability assessments. Its ability to provide insightful reports and remediation suggestions assists companies in efficiently managing security risks and achieving compliance with critical regulatory standards.

Invicti

Seeker Interactive is a powerful tool offering streamlined functionalities for business management and strategic planning. It provides key features designed to enhance operational efficiency and decision-making processes.

Seeker Interactive delivers comprehensive management solutions, enabling users to deftly handle a wide range of tasks essential for business success. Through its intuitive platform, it supports strategic planning by allowing users to optimize operations precisely. Known for its versatility, it caters to industry-specific requirements, ensuring seamless integration into existing processes. Users benefit from robust analytics and data-driven insights, vital for informed decisions.

What are the key features of Seeker Interactive?

Data Analytics: Delivers in-depth insights crucial for informed decision-making.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized views tailored to user preferences and needs.
Scalable Architecture: Grows with your business to accommodate increasing demands.
Real-time Monitoring: Provides immediate insights for proactive management.

What are the benefits and ROI to look for in Seeker Interactive reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines operations to save time and resources.
Improved Decision-Making: Leverages analytics for better strategic outcomes.
Cost Reduction: Optimizes resource allocation and reduces unnecessary expenditure.
Increased Flexibility: Adapts to the evolving needs of your business.

Seeker Interactive is extensively utilized in industries such as retail and finance, where precision and agility are paramount. Its adaptability to specific industry demands ensures seamless adaptation, supporting dynamic business environments by providing the necessary tools to maintain a competitive edge.

Black Duck

Sample Customers

Samsung, The Walt Disney Company, T-Systems, ING Bank

El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone

Find out what your peers are saying about Imperva, Akamai, Radware and others in API Security. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best API Security vendors.

We monitor all API Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.