We performed a comparison between Informatica PowerCenter and Teradata QueryGrid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."It has very good monitoring and process monitoring."
"In the end, you have structured, proper data for use in an integrated BI solution."
"I like the completeness of the way I can build ETL workflows."
"Ease and speed of building integrations, especially integrations between different applications, such as our Hospital Information System."
"The most valuable features are the metadata repository and the data warehouse application console."
"I like the automated scheduling feature."
"To me, what's most valuable in Informatica PowerCenter is the flexibility in building the integration pipeline. Usually, you need to have a platform to be able to integrate with different technologies, including legacy data such as the mainframe. The platform should also be rich enough to transform the data per your business requirement, with no restrictions. Rich integration and rich transformation capabilities are the two key capabilities in Informatica PowerCenter. The solution also offers ease of use. Another valuable feature of Informatica PowerCenter is the drag-and-drop integration because it's GUI-based, similar to IBM and Oracle."
"The reliability of the product and the way of orchestration of different services is valuable to us."
"It is a highly robust software solution."
"Include more instruments for LOGs analysis, interpretation, and job corrections."
"Integration with Artificial Intelligence would benefit this solution."
"The reputation of Informatica is that it is expensive."
"Informatica PowerCenter is outdated and would benefit from modernization. They should have a very good migration strategy from Informatica PowerCenter to AACF. Informatica PowerCenter there is no point in using it, you have to use a cloud version."
"Compared to solutions offering similar functionalities, Informatica PowerCenter is not very flexible regarding customized integrations."
"The UI is outdated and old-fashioned, at least in our current version. Also, we have experienced some stability issues with the Workflow Monitor application."
"We had stability issues, mostly with JVM size."
"In the future, I would like to see Informatica PowerCenter integrate a more powerful dashboard."
"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."
Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 3rd in Data Integration with 78 reviews while Teradata QueryGrid is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review. Informatica PowerCenter is rated 8.0, while Teradata QueryGrid is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata QueryGrid writes "Unified and efficient query processing that seamlessly integrates and analyzes data from heterogeneous sources". Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, SSIS, Databricks and AWS Glue, whereas Teradata QueryGrid is most compared with Denodo, Teradata Data Mover and IBM InfoSphere DataStage.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.