We performed a comparison between Informatica Powercenter and SSIS based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Informatica PowerCenter is a more advanced option if you can afford the higher price. However, SSIS scored better in terms of ease of deployment and service and support.
"The most valuable feature of Informatica PowerCenter is data transformation and user-friendliness."
"What I like most about Informatica PowerCenter is that it's the best tool in the market for data integration. Currently, I work in L'Oréal, where a new system from SAP is used. Informatica PowerCenter integration with SAP is very, very fast and very, very simple, so you have the server flow from SAP, and through Informatica PowerCenter, you can ingest the data and make that data available for the business more quickly."
"Enterprise-scale ETL solution that's very stable and is easy to scale. It integrates and connects with multiple new systems, both structured and semi-structured."
"The setup is very simple."
"The technical support for Informatica PowerCenter is good."
"It's a complete package, which is why we use this solution."
"I like the completeness of the way I can build ETL workflows."
"Has a good visual tool for data mapping."
"SSIS' best feature is SFTP connectivity."
"The technical support is very good."
"The most important features are it works well and provides self-service BI."
"The debugging capabilities are great, particularly during data flow execution. You can look into the data and see what's going on in the pipeline."
"The UI is very user-friendly."
"We like that this solution includes a developer edition, free of charge, to allow for training."
"It is also easy to learn and user-friendly. Microsoft is also good in terms of technical support. They have built a large community all over the world."
"Data Flows are the main component we use. These can range from a simple source to sink ETL, to many source to many sink dataflows."
"If we could have the option of performance improvement within Informatica, and if it could have more features, that would be ideal."
"Informatica PowerCenter could improve by having a single interface because half of the system is still in the legacy interface and many other elements are moved to the developer client. It would be good if there was a single interface for the end user and developers."
"If you want to transfer a ZIP file, it is a pain. You need to use Command-Line. Sometimes we just want to transfer a file. It should be easy to move them from A to B."
"In terms of performance improvement and tuning, there should be a bit more guidance and documentation."
"Its scalability can be improved. It is not scalable."
"It would be good to recreate the entire interface to make it easier for users to build workflows."
"This product is going to decommission in the next couple of years."
"While on-premises is a better product, we really need to move to the cloud and need the cloud to be as robust as this product."
"The creation of the measure in the DAC's model could be improved."
"We have a stability problem because when something works, it works one time. The next time, it doesn't work."
"We would like the solution to be expanded so that it is available for other platforms than just Microsoft."
"Sometimes, there are compatibility issues with some features. From time to time, I also face issues when trying to migrate. If I misconfigure things when I use Snapshot, the migration will fail.It can take a long time to migrate huge amounts of data, so it would be nice if that could be faster."
"The solution could improve by having quicker release updates."
"There is connectivity with other databases, however, this is the most significant issue that has to be addressed."
"Involving a data lake or data engineering aspects would be useful. While it is there, we need more features included."
"SSIS sometimes hangs, and there are some problems with servers going down after they've been patched."
Informatica PowerCenter is ranked 2nd in Data Integration Tools with 38 reviews while SSIS is ranked 3rd in Data Integration Tools with 35 reviews. Informatica PowerCenter is rated 7.8, while SSIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerCenter writes "Stable, provides good support, and integrating it with other systems is very fast, but its pricing is expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SSIS writes "SSIS 2016 - The good, the bad, and the ugly". Informatica PowerCenter is most compared with Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerExchange and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas SSIS is most compared with Talend Open Studio, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, IBM InfoSphere DataStage and Alteryx Designer. See our Informatica PowerCenter vs. SSIS report.
See our list of best Data Integration Tools vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Curious why you would compare these 2 tools and why you wouldn't be looking for a PaaS solution?
SSIS is free verses Informatica is the opposite. But there are no plans to fully embrace SSIS within Azure. They have moved to ADF and Synapse pipelines.
That said there is IR (Integration Runtime) so you can run SSIS in Azure but it's limited in terms of SSIS add-ons. Clearly, the future for Microsoft is Azure and Synapse so don't count on SSIS staying around for many more years.
In fact, the BiXpress add-on has been deprecated by its new owner. And I would NOT recommend using SSIS without BiXpress as its built-in logging and error control is awful.
I'm looking at us migrating from SSIS to ADF over the next few years.
SSIS PowerPack is a group of drag and drop connectors for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, commonly called SSIS. The collection helps organizations boost productivity with code-free components and connect cloud and on-premises data sources. We find it very useful for connecting traditional data sources, big data, and NoSQL.
We like that it can carry out simple and complex transformations. It is easy to use and helps us connect with multiple systems and web services. It makes it really easy for developers to develop production SSIS packages. It helps us to pull data because it is DBA-friendly.
However, the filtering of the tasks is a bit difficult, and the error messages can be confusing and hard to resolve.
That’s why, when evaluating both solutions, we ultimately decided to go with Informatica PowerCenter. This metadata-driven integration tool is easy to use and effective even when creating complex mapping. It is easy to monitor jobs, create workflows, and detect bugs. It is well suited for handling a low volume of records, therefore maintaining a real-time operation at an affordable cost.
Another advantage is that it works with ETL-type data integration, connecting to almost all types of database systems. It has great support and documentation, too. Informatica PowerCenter can address different data quality issues, such as data masking and virtualization. It has supporting tools for big data as well. It is critical to ensure we can feed on multiple data streams and transform them into usable data in the data warehouse.
There are a few downsides, though. There aren’t many scheduling options, and debugging the workflows is kind of hard.
Conclusions:
Overall, SSIS is a very good group of tools. For organizations used to working with MS products, it provides easy integration and connections between databases. Since we work with a small number of records, the Informatica PowerCenter works better for us.