

Informatica IDMC and Qlik Replicate compete in the data integration and management category. Informatica IDMC seems to have the upper hand with its extensive feature set and broad applicability across various data environments, while Qlik Replicate is specialized for real-time data replication and change data capture, which is vital for organizations with specific needs for data warehousing and analytics.
Features: Informatica IDMC offers robust integration capabilities, master data management, and comprehensive data governance. Users value the 360-degree view of data, dynamic data cleansing, and validation functions. Qlik Replicate excels in real-time data replication and change data capture, allowing seamless data movement for analytics. Its strength lies in handling multiple data sources efficiently.
Room for Improvement: Informatica IDMC could enhance its user interface, address integration challenges with SAP products, and improve reporting functionalities. Users have noted the need for preconfigured business rules and stable connectivity. Qlik Replicate could benefit from clearer error messages, more intuitive interfaces, and better integration with APIs. Licensing complexity and logging capabilities are reported areas for enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Informatica IDMC and Qlik Replicate support on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployments. While Informatica IDMC is noted for its flexibility, users sometimes experience response delays in technical support. Qlik Replicate users report setup challenges in complex environments, but customer service is generally perceived positively for both.
Pricing and ROI: Informatica IDMC is recognized for its higher pricing, justified by its feature-rich offering, though pricing model improvements could enhance accessibility for smaller enterprises. Qlik Replicate presents a more competitive pricing structure, providing good ROI for those needing robust real-time replication without complex ETL solutions, though it may still pose challenges for smaller businesses.
Leadership prefers to utilize third-party tools, such as Snowflake, which has both storage and ELT features.
The stability and performance remain issues.
Compared to Collibra Catalog, where the value is noticeable within six months.
I conducted a cost comparison with the AWS service provider, and this option is much cheaper than the Kinesis service offered by AWS.
Customers have seen ROI with Qlik Replicate because they get their data for analysis faster, enabling quicker decision-making compared to traditional data sourcing methods.
Due to the tool's maturity limitations, solutions are not always simple and often require workarounds.
Even after going out of service support, they still reached back to me whenever I raised tickets.
We expect more responsive assistance because they have the expertise since Informatica is their tool, but I don't see enough expertise on the Informatica support side.
Even priority tickets, which should be resolved in minutes, can take days.
Support response times could be improved as there are sometimes delays in receiving replies to support cases.
I have used the product over multiple systems and was able to write reports for large data sets without any performance issues.
As a SaaS platform, IDMC is quite scalable and provides complete flexibility.
There are many options available, and the licensing model is quite good, supporting our needs effectively.
The system could be scaled to include more sources and functions.
Stability is crucial because IDMC holds business-critical data, and it needs to be available all the time for business users.
There are substantial stability issues with Informatica Cloud Data Quality on the cloud.
I find the stability to be good, with occasional restarts required every two to three months due to glitches.
The tool needs to mature in terms of category-specific attributes or dynamic attributes.
The current solution requires code-writing and tweaking, while other solutions offer material-level matches.
If the development interface could be optimized to have fewer modules, it would be greatly beneficial.
It is a core-based licensing, which, especially in the banking industry, results in the system capacity being utilized up to a maximum of 60%.
Qlik Replicate could be improved in the next release by incorporating more monitoring options to monitor the logs.
It ranges from a quarter million to a couple of million a year.
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is affordable for my specific use cases, with the pricing being rated three or four on a scale where one is very cheap.
Regarding pricing, compared to other tools I have worked with, Informatica offers competitive pricing, which I find not high in terms of starting strategy.
Licensing is calculated based on the machine's total capacity rather than actual usage.
For Qlik Replicate, the setup cost includes the requirement of a server, which represents the hardware cost that must be covered.
The platform's ability to pull in data from other platforms without the need for an additional integration tool enhances its appeal.
The connectors serve as the main functionality, making data integration processes more efficient by saving time and effort.
We could run data quality rules as part of Service Bus, which ensured the integrity of customer information before it was entered into our database.
The most valuable feature of Qlik Replicate is their change data capture feature.
Data retrieved from the system can be pushed to multiple places, supporting various divisions such as marketing, loans, and others.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) | 3.7% |
| Qlik Replicate | 1.7% |
| Other | 94.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 51 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 27 |
| Large Enterprise | 153 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) offers seamless integration of master data management, data quality, and data integration with a cloud-native architecture supporting multiple data management styles, optimizing data governance through metadata management.
IDMC enhances data synchronization and mapping tasks, utilizing a broad range of connectors to interact efficiently with data sources. Its precise address validation via AddressDoctor and intuitive navigation bolster user empowerment, delivering agility, scalability, and security in data governance. Despite its strengths, areas like ease of use, SAP integration, and reporting could benefit from enhancements. Connectivity issues and workflow complexities are noted, needing improvements in performance, support, and licensing cost. Users demand expanded ETL capabilities, real-time processing, and broader data source support to address growing data needs.
What are the key features of IDMC?In industries such as banking, healthcare, and telecom, IDMC is implemented for data integration, cloud migration, and enhancing data quality. Its capabilities are crucial for metadata management, lineage tracking, and real-time processing, ensuring high data quality and streamlined operations.
Qlik Replicate is a data replication solution for replicating data from one source database to another for business intelligence software. It offers data manipulation and transformations, replication without impacting source databases, and ease of use without needing ETL. The solution is stable and user-friendly, with detailed logging and support.
Qlik Replicate has improved the organization by allowing each team to replicate their data into a single-source data location. The most important feature of Qlik Replicate is its ability to replicate and update records without needing a programmer.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.