No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Infinite Blue vs Microsoft Azure App Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Infinite Blue
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
45th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Low-Code Development Platforms (32nd)
Microsoft Azure App Service
Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of Infinite Blue is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure App Service is 2.4%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Rapid Application Development Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure App Service2.4%
Infinite Blue0.6%
Other97.0%
Rapid Application Development Software
 

Featured Reviews

Logisthead67 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Logistics and Operations at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
A simple solution with an easy setup and good stability
The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelilng The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy. The user interface should add some more functionality in the next…
AntonioNascimento - PeerSpot reviewer
Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Seamless integration and application hosting enabled through versatile service
When using a Linux App Service or containerized App Services, the logging is not as good as when using the Windows version. The Linux App Service should be more user-friendly, focusing on logging, troubleshooting, and similar features. With Microsoft Azure App Service, it is more difficult with Linux or other container solutions because there are many options. When creating an App Service, you can create it as Linux or Windows. After that, you can choose some stack or use Docker to container. When using Linux with container, the logging functionality is not as robust.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is simple. It's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out. It's very fast to develop the screens and the modelling."
"The solution is simple; it's very easy to deploy, and there's no risk with sorting that out, and it's very fast to develop the screens and the modeling."
"The most valuable feature is the Power Apps because it is very user-friendly."
"If you want to create something, you can create it all on Azure, simple and quick."
"The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server."
"Azure App Service is too easy to setup and appropriate for developers with no knowledge in infrastructure."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure App Service is good."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to scale the application."
"The Data Factory is very good, as is the SSIS, which I also use on the cloud."
"The best feature is scalability, which allows you to target potential clients worldwide by connecting the application to a local server. This makes the application readily accessible, and the response time will be much better."
 

Cons

"The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy."
"The solution is expensive. They should try to improve their pricing strategy."
"The main problem is that it's overwhelming. Finding the best practices and the optimal way to implement something is always challenging."
"Customers love it when a solution is affordable, but with Microsoft Azure App Service, you can start and stop it, and when you stop it, it won't be reachable and it won't be available, yet you're still being charged for it. You'll still be charged even if the solution isn't accessible because Microsoft Azure App Service runs on a shared virtual machine that keeps on running, so if there's a way to work this out, it'll be a great improvement to only pay for what you use. The solution should have no hidden cost and no extra charge when it's stopped. This is what needs improvement in Microsoft Azure App Service."
"If you're on the cloud, you just get a web interface without much detail for additional configuration or the authority to configure the root or system-level configuration."
"App Service sometimes becomes very slow to respond, and it can be difficult to find the issue causing this."
"The configuration is slow without understanding the systematic process."
"I am new to the intervention and I find it difficult to find my way around the user interface. I have my own learning tool. However, it could be simpler for new users."
"Limited integration is an area for improvement in Microsoft Azure App Service. Another area for improvement in the platform is multi-language support."
"There has been some building of pipelines where we've had to test and redesign a little so if there were maybe some easier to setup guides or more template data flows that would be an improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product's price is low, especially if we compare it with other tools or clouds, like Google Cloud or AWS Cloud."
"The pricing and cost of this solution depends on the use and needs of a business."
"Azure App Service is expensive compared to its competitors, especially its cloud-only version."
"Less than USD $100 per month."
"The price of the solution is high overall."
"I rate Microsoft Azure App Service a seven out of ten for pricing."
"The product is not expensive. The tool's price is okay for all of the benefits you get from the solution."
"The price of the support could improve. It is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
7%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business12
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise33
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Would you choose Microsoft Azure App Service or PowerApps?
Microsoft Azure App Service is helpful if you need to set up temporary servers for customers to run their programs in locations that other cloud providers do not cater to. When servers are closer t...
Do you recommend Microsoft Azure App Service?
I highly recommend Microsoft Azure. We have been using it for nearly four years. We mostly use it for creating and maintaining websites, such as content management systems like WordPress sites, whi...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure App Service?
One valuable feature of Azure App Service for us is its integration with Azure DevOps, which we heavily rely on in our development process.
 

Also Known As

Progress Rollbase, Rollbase
Azure App Service, MS Azure App Service
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pironet NDH, Jungle Lasers, Aintercarga SAS, ASPsoftware, Cloudselling
Real Madrid, Absolut, AccuWeather, Heineken, NBC News, Paramount
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, ServiceNow, Oracle and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: March 2026.
885,837 professionals have used our research since 2012.