IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs ScienceLogic comparison

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Read 45 ScienceLogic reviews

546 Views
357 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus and ScienceLogic compete in the IT operations management domain. ScienceLogic appears to have the upper hand with advanced features, though IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus may provide competitive pricing and support options.

Features: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus offers high complexity event correlation, robust automation, and supports legacy protocols like CORBA. ScienceLogic excels with hybrid cloud monitoring, dynamic discovery, and strong analytics.

Room for Improvement: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus could enhance user-friendliness, simplify integration of modern protocols, and reduce setup complexity. ScienceLogic could improve customization options, expand application monitoring, and better integrate with non-standard systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic provides a simplified deployment model and top-notch customer support, facilitating smooth implementation. IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus involves a more intricate setup due to complexity but offers reliable support for any challenges.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus demands higher upfront setup costs, potentially offering favorable ROI in large-scale environments. ScienceLogic presents more competitive pricing and quicker ROI, appealing to those focusing on cloud and hybrid solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic Report (Updated: June 2025).

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs. ScienceLogic

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Ranking in Event Monitoring

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Event Monitoring

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Network Monitoring Software (25th), Server Monitoring (13th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (21st), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (16th), AIOps (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus is 10.2%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ScienceLogic is 7.5%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman

Performance & Monitoring Supervisor at Saudi Telecom Company

Aids in network performance monitoring and management

I am working as a customer, mainly using IntelliQ and another product, IBM NetCool, Watson AI. These products are used for monitoring network performance and management. The primary use case involves network performance monitoring, and it is compatible only with IBM DB2 IBM Tivoli NetCool…

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is an easy-to-use solution."

"IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus supports legacy protocols like CORBA, Huawei, and other telecom protocols, which I find beneficial."

"Probes are the best feature because they are well written which rarely requires you to write additional rules. These probes monitor activity within your environment."

"Offers very good event/alert drill-down and statistical reporting capabilities."

"The biggest plus points for me are the configurability and scalability of the solution, as well as the multi-tenancy of the platform."

"The most valuable feature is the event management capability."

"OMNIbus is valuable for its compatibility and performance, as I haven't encountered any performance issues."

"The monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus pros

"ScienceLogic allows us to create and customize a user-friendly dashboard."

"The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring."

"The power flow is great."

"I recommend ScienceLogic to other users."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"Provides agentless monitoring so there's no need to install the agent on each server."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

More ScienceLogic pros

Cons

"The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models."

"Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality."

"Its technical support team takes longer to reply."

"There should be an easier-to-understand model, more of a flat-structured model rather than different tiers of licenses which complicates licensing."

"The web portal and typical event controls are a little outdated."

"Areas that could be better include the fact that the solution is only on-premises, lacks AI capabilities, and support response times could be quicker."

"They could enhance the visibility to give us a unified view of our entire IT infrastructure."

"The solution needs to invest in the development of a knowledge base and use of AI services for providing event resolution and intervention directions."

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus cons

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"Admins do not have direct access to the reporting."

"Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial."

"ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services."

"There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"We want to understand: how does the back end work? What if some problem occurs? What we can do? They need to provide more information."

More ScienceLogic cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its license cost is a little bit more than other solutions. Our customers expect a standard market price that is comparative to other products. For each and every NetCool OMNIbus component, we have to purchase a separate license. These components are not free with the product."

"It is a costly solution."

"You have to have the right level of budget to afford this solution."

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

18%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

If the various HW elements are from the same vendor, a monitoring solution provided by that vendor or its partners will potentially result in lower licensing and operational costs. Moreover, for ve...

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

IBM is working on converting NetCool to NetCool Operations Insight, which runs on Watson AI. There were areas needing improvement in terms of AI, however, they have migrated the entire NetCool suit...

What is your primary use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

OMNIbus is used for alert processing and deduplication of alarms. It is used for performing certain actions on any alarm processed through NetCool. It serves as a core component for action triggers...

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Comparisons

Compared 29% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 17% of the time

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 13% of the time

SCOM vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 10% of the time

BigPanda vs IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

Compared 9% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus Competitors

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 12% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 3% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

June 2025

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus product report

Download ScienceLogic product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus

No data available

Overview

Tivoli Netcool OMNIbus provides near real-time service assurance for business infrastructure, applications, servers, network devices and protocols, Internet protocols, storage and security devices.

IBM

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

Sample Customers

Consolidated Communications, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Capgemini

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell