Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more
2019-10-27T06:20:00Z
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 23

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

4
PeerSpot user
4 Answers
The Pranshul Garg - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5
2022-02-18T15:24:00Z
18 February 22

I would like for the next release to be more user-friendly and out of date. The next release should focus on the cloud, AI, and ML technologies.

VijayDaniel - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
2020-12-23T11:34:36Z
23 December 20

Its integration could be better. They should provide an easier integration for all the monitoring stuff, and it will make things easier for us. Currently, there is a complexity in integrating it with a vendor application, and we have to use another tool to integrate it with a vendor application. To integrate some applications with NetCool, I need to install an IBM tool on top of it. It would be good if they can provide an API or any kind of interface that we can leverage while developing a new protocol interface or application. We should be able to use an API or interface with NetCool. Its GUI can also be better. As compared to other tools, it is not user friendly, and it is not easy to do stuff through GUI. Whenever we do anything on the GUI, it takes time. They need to focus on the GUI part, especially the dashboard. They should focus on how users can effectively drill down from one box to another. The visual appeal of the dashboard is as important as the data and functionality.

RamuChittiprolu - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Engineer at JCPenney Co.
Real User
2020-05-28T06:26:41Z
28 May 20

The web portal and typical event controls are a little outdated. The need to work on improving the dashboard layout. The whole layout is an old style and needs updating. The functionality is great but it needs to look more modern, perhaps by moving to HTML 5 dashboards. The price could be made more competitive.

SA
Department Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 10
2019-10-27T06:20:00Z
27 October 19

The cost of the product is quite high. They should work to adjust their pricing models.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Event Monitoring. Updated: September 2022.
632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
PL
User at Australian Department of Defence
Mar 23, 2021
Hi peers, What are the main benefits and differences of each product and what are their functional differences?
Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Content at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Jul 18, 2017
Let the community know what you think. Share your opinions now!
2 out of 9 answers
PeerSpot user
Big Data Administrator at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
01 April 15
Accuracy of events.
PeerSpot user
Senior System Monitoring Administrator (SME) at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
21 May 15
Any tool you use for Event Monitoring should be simple to Operate have an uncomplicated UI and yet rich in functionality to enable one event at the right time in the right format for the right audience.
Download Free Report
Download our free Event Monitoring Report and find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Micro Focus, and more! Updated: September 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.