IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs SCOM comparison

IBM and Microsoft are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. IBM is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.0, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. IBM holds a 4.7% mindshare in EM, compared to Microsoft’s 9.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Read 5 IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact reviews

1,117 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SCOM

Read 83 SCOM reviews

10,547 Views
1,898 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

SCOM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

SCOM and IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact are competing in the IT infrastructure monitoring and management space. SCOM has a competitive edge in pricing and support, while IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact excels in features.

Features: SCOM offers seamless integration with Microsoft environments, strong monitoring for Windows servers, and robust alerting and reporting. IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact excels in handling large-scale environments, advanced event correlation, and comprehensive data analysis from heterogeneous systems.

Room for Improvement: SCOM could enhance integration with non-Microsoft platforms, improve scalability, and increase automation capabilities. IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact can benefit from a simplified deployment process, improved user interface, and streamlined configuration procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM offers an intuitive deployment model, particularly within Microsoft-centric IT infrastructures, with accessible support channels. IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact requires specialized expertise for deployment but is complemented by strong technical support.

Pricing and ROI: SCOM's lower setup cost is beneficial for smaller enterprises or those in a Microsoft-focused environment, offering quicker ROI. IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact requires a higher initial investment, yet its extensive features and high scalability justify the cost for large enterprises, promising significant long-term ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. SCOM Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. SCOM

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Ranking in Event Monitoring

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SCOM

Ranking in Event Monitoring

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact is 4.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SCOM is 9.6%, up from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Event Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SCOM	9.6%
IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact	4.7%
Other	85.7%

Event Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Hennie Du Toit

Principal Specialist Architecture And Governance at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

Event management strengthens with automation but needs better event flooding handling

Better handling of event flooding in IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact would be beneficial. If there are massive issues with power, for example, and we get millions of events, then it struggles to deal with that. Better root cause correlation and faster processing for IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact would be helpful. If there can be more end-to-end functionality, such as observability tools built in natively, that would be great. With correlation, IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact has many functions, but we've built them custom-built. Functions such as automated logging, automated dispatching, and automated notification of engineers could be native in the tool.

Read full review

Akshita Kukreja

Assistant Manager at SMS group GmbH

Have integrated effective monitoring and seamless alerting with improved visualization capabilities

The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool. We have implemented and integrated this to create dashboarding of the SCOM monitoring system for the database, SQL, and the Linux servers we have configured in SCOM. We have created separate dashboarding for it, and the monitoring and creating rules and monitors in the management servers and management packs that SCOM provides are very useful for us. The alerting mechanism of SCOM has benefited our operations because we have modified the thresholds as per our internal requirements. We have configured threshold modifications for the CPU, memory, and especially for disk space. For routine disk space usage on the system, we have provided a separate threshold configuration.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability has been very good for IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact, rated around eight or nine."

"It is easy to integrate with other models such as Oracle, other systems, external systems, and to reach events."

"The operational views and third party connections to fetch the data and to help engage on more activities are the most valuable aspects of the solution."

"This product allows us to make use of open-source products, including running Java code."

"The solution is great at being able to fetch almost any kind of file."

"The most valuable feature that comes with Netcool/Impact is the ISPF APA support. It is inherent to Netcool/Impact, so I can use the ISPF of any other product, which I can invoke and consume through Impact, and do integrations, which is great. I run the Netcool desktop application so I can integrate with other applications in the ticketing system. It's a great ability being able to invoke ISPF and integrate."

"I can recommend Netcool/Impact because it's the perfect solution when it comes to invoking ISPF APA and using ISPF integration throughout the rest of your other products."

"Alerts notify the server or service owner of problems, allowing quick decisions or actions to keep the service running based on configured thresholds."

"SCOM is a required tool in my job since I am responsible in overseeing multiple virtual and physical servers and services for a bank."

"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."

"The advantages of SCOM are that it is definitely user friendly and a more appropriate solution for what we need."

"This product is really easy to use and has best monitoring capabilities when used to monitor Microsoft products."

"We heavily rely on SCOM as our pro-active monitoring tool, preventing various problems and resolving issues quickly with the informative detail raised in SCOM alerts, which assists our department in being pro-active in resolving issues with servers and services rather than reactive."

"It's easy to use."

"The solution primarily drives system information, and I believe it works fine."

More SCOM pros

Cons

"Better handling of event flooding in IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact would be beneficial. If there are massive issues with power, for example, and we get millions of events, then it struggles to deal with that."

"For improvement, I'd say the dashboard and the overall GUI could use some work. Although, I don't think that there's much improvement that Netcool really needs to achieve in this area, because when we're talking GUI, Impact is able to integrate with any third-party system and it comes with ISPF APA. It's more beneficial than Netcool/OMNIbus in this respect, and it's quite easy to handle."

"Stability-wise, this product needs to be improved."

"The stability of this solution is somewhat less than other similar products that I have used."

"The solution is somewhat complicated. It's not exactly straightforward."

"For improvement, I'd say the dashboard and the overall GUI could use some work."

"IBM is not investing in the development of the on-premise version of this solution."

"The System Centre Operations Manager (SCOM) is great at alerting you when something breaks. It's not so great at reporting."

"Too small of a scope in reports, need to improve a lot."

"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."

"They can focus more on cloud monitoring instead of on-premise monitoring. We should be able to monitor cloud-related applications."

"On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically."

"Overall, support is not great but it's not bad."

"I’d like to see cross-platform support that would make SCOM a single enterprise monitoring application."

"If they're looking for real-time, within-the-minute monitoring of servers from a console, then I would say that it falls short there."

More SCOM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is yearly, and although I'm happy with the pricing I do think it could be better."

"Licensing of IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact depends on the number of nodes on the element that you are monitoring."

"Our Enterprise Agreement includes the price."

"SCOM is part of the System Center suite and I am satisfied with the pricing."

"SCOM's pricing is average."

"We have to pay for a license and the price is fine for us."

"The platform is cost-effective due to our existing Microsoft support."

"We have an EA with Microsoft, and it comes as part of the EA."

"There is a license needed to use this solution and it is paid annually."

"Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month."

More SCOM pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	54

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact?

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact is our event management tool, specifically the umbrella fault management tool set. All of our events across the network correlate the data for us, and we have certain use ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact?

We remain a partner with IBM Tivoli and continue using their products. We use IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact's AIOps functionality. We experienced some skills issues, but currently receive assistance fr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SCOM?

I am not aware of the exact pricing as it is managed by my supervisor. As an academic institution, we receive substantial discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SCOM?

We believe that the dashboarding in SCOM needs to be improved or enhanced because it is not too expressive in reporting. We can work on deploying new ways of viewing things and modifying visualizat...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SCOM?

My usual use case for SCOM is as an administrator role where I create reports and provide system configuration for Linux and installation of the SCOM agent. I handle deploying and upgrading the age...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText AI Operations Management vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Compared 24% of the time

IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Compared 17% of the time

IDERA SQL Diagnostic Manager for SQL Server vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Compared 15% of the time

ScienceLogic vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Compared 12% of the time

Zenoss Cloud vs IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact Competitors

Nagios XI vs SCOM

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

Zabbix vs SCOM

Compared 5% of the time

LogicMonitor vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs SCOM

Compared 4% of the time

More SCOM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact

August 2026

Download IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact product report

Buyer's Guide

SCOM

July 2026

Download SCOM product report

Also Known As

Tivoli NetCool Impact

System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012

Overview

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact offers AI-driven network management and integration capabilities, handling complex tasks with open-source tools. It's widely used for event correlation and data consolidation, supporting seamless connections for effective network operations.

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact is extensively leveraged within network management, focusing on event correlation and ticketing. It aggregates data from multiple sources, facilitating streamlined event handling. Essential to Netcool teams, it is employed to manage events inside Omnibus and integrate with ticketing systems like Remedy. Its functionalities cover event management, data enrichment from external databases, and alarm handling through connectivity with tools like Excel. While it is appreciated for its automation, correlation modeling, and custom function creation, enhancements are needed for event flooding management, root cause correlation, and stability. Challenges exist in modern technology integration and better configuration processes.

What are IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact's Key Features?

AI-Driven Network Management: Intelligent network operations through AI capabilities.
ISPF APA Support: Integration with ISPF APA enhances performance.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with third-party systems.
Data Handling: Manages extensive volumes and types of data efficiently.
Automation Capabilities: Streamlines processes through robust automation features.
Custom Function Creation: Enables creation of tailored functions for specific needs.

What Benefits Should Users Look for in Reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Look for improved handling of network events.
Data Consolidation: Facilitates merging data from different sources.
Streamlined Events Management: Efficiently manages and streamlines event workflows.
Enhanced Connectivity: Supports connections with databases and applications.

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact is implemented across multiple industries for efficient network management, especially where event correlation and data integration are critical. Enterprise environments rely on its capability to handle diverse data formats and volumes. Its integration with enterprise applications and databases makes it suitable for sectors demanding reliable network operations and data management strategies.

IBM

SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.

SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.

What are key features of SCOM?

Microsoft Environment Monitoring: Specialized for Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.
Integration Capabilities: Seamless integration with Active Directory and Azure for streamlined operations.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailor visual data displays to enhance monitoring and decision-making.
Extensive Management Packs: Broad range of management packs for enhanced resource and application control.
Robust Alert Mechanisms: Comprehensive alerting to maintain service stability and address potential issues promptly.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced management of server applications and infrastructure.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Detailed insights into performance and service availability.
Proactive Issue Notification: Timely alerts for quick issue resolution.
Improved Control: More efficient server management through automation and visibility.

In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Claranet, Consolidated Communications, Telus, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Telekom Srbija, Bendigo Community Telco, Capgemini, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen (SBB)

Dialog Telekom

Buyer's Guide

IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. SCOM

August 2026

Free Report: IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. SCOM

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. SCOM and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Tivoli NetCool Impact vs. SCOM report.

See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.