IBM SoftLayer vs Wasabi comparison

IBM and Wasabi Technologies are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. IBM is ranked #23, while Wasabi Technologies is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. IBM holds a 1.4% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Wasabi Technologies’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 77% of Wasabi Technologies users who would recommend it.

IBM SoftLayer

Read 2 IBM SoftLayer reviews

364 Views
262 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Wasabi

Read 10 Wasabi reviews

1,766 Views
1,731 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

IBM SoftLayer

Wasabi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

IBM SoftLayer and Wasabi compete in the IT service solutions category. While both have distinct advantages, Wasabi's robust features and cost-benefit give it the upper hand for many tech buyers.

Features: IBM SoftLayer is known for its comprehensive networking and security capabilities, making it suitable for broader IT infrastructure needs. Wasabi offers straightforward data storage solutions and high performance, attracting users who seek efficient, scalable storage without complexity. IBM SoftLayer also includes extensive virtual server options while Wasabi provides faster data retrieval and upload speeds.

Room for Improvement: IBM SoftLayer needs better integration with third-party tools, enhanced scalability options, and improved user interface design. Wasabi could benefit from more advanced management features, better data insight tools, and expanded API functionality to enhance user control and flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM SoftLayer's complex deployment model requires more technical expertise, but it is backed by robust customer service. Wasabi is favored for its simplicity in deployment and ease of use, making it ideal for users seeking rapid and uncomplicated setups. Both companies offer strong customer service support, but Wasabi's ease of deployment is a notable advantage.

Pricing and ROI: IBM SoftLayer has higher setup costs, impacting short-term ROI despite its extensive features. Wasabi provides competitive pricing with lower initial costs, resulting in a quicker ROI and better value for money for cost-sensitive buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM SoftLayer vs. Wasabi Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM SoftLayer vs. Wasabi

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM SoftLayer

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

23rd

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Wasabi

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of IBM SoftLayer is 1.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 4.9%, down from 7.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Wasabi	4.9%
IBM SoftLayer	1.4%
Other	93.7%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

reviewer1032702

Global Principal Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Stable with excellent speed and agility

The most valuable aspect of the solution is simply to have the ability to host in a cloud form and out of the data center - the IBM big iron solution. It's the speed and the agility that really sell SoftLayer. The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer. The ability to extract act from your current location, load into your future location, with limited change, and then be able to take the transfer actions slowly and methodically after you're in your new location is the part that really makes this awesome. The stability and scalability are quite good.

Read full review

Gabriel Inya-Agha

Chief Executive Officer at Quickening Group

Cost-effectiveness and seamless integration boost long-term data management while file retrieval needs improvement

Wasabi is cost-effective, has no ingress and egress fees, and is reliable. Wasabi helps us in maintaining our enterprise-grade safety requirements because it's highly functional, allowing us to maintain redundancies required for some of our solutions. Wasabi is highly integratable because many systems successfully use it. It is extremely useful in facilitating seamless adoption into our current operational procedures. Many of the solutions that are on Kubernetes use Wasabi integration for their S3, and increasingly, virtually all of them now use Wasabi for their integrations. Wasabi's features of eliminating egress and API requests fees have ensured that we can run our social media sites without charging users for data, which increases the adoption of our platform. Wasabi's simplified pricing model is phenomenal in helping our organization predict and manage cloud costs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to extract from your current location, load into your future location with limited change, and then be able to take the transfer actions slowly and methodically after you're in your new location is the part that really makes this awesome."

"The stability is the solution's most valuable aspect for our organization."

"The ELT versus ETL extract, transform and load versus extract, load, and then transform, the ELT method is what really sells SoftLayer."

"The solution is highly stable."

"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."

"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."

"Wasabi's simplified pricing model is phenomenal in helping our organization predict and manage cloud costs."

"Overall, I would rate Wasabi a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."

"The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy."

More Wasabi pros

Cons

"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."

"For us, the versioning was an issue."

"The interface is hard to use for us. It should be simplified."

"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."

"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."

"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."

"The most important improvement we would like to see in Wasabi is the ability to find files and folders easily on the platform, as it is not very easy at all right now."

"Wasabi could be cheaper, however, it is already really cheap, so I cannot say if there is anything specific that would be an improvement."

"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."

"The scalability could be improved."

"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."

More Wasabi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Wasabi is a cheap solution, and users have to pay for a monthly license."

"The price of the solution is inexpensive."

"Wasabi has better pricing than Nutanix."

"I can only tell you that Wasabi costs about half what Amazon Web Services is charging. Now, the cost per month is a more difficult question. That varies depending on the capacity, the services you're employing, and that type of thing."

"The tool’s price is very reasonable."

"The price is reasonable."

"Wasabi is a cost-effective solution for data storage, priced at just under six dollars per terabyte."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Aerospace/Defense Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Wasabi?

The most important improvement we would like to see in Wasabi is the ability to find files and folders easily on the platform, as it is not very easy at all right now.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Wasabi?

It's been used as a storage system for our social media site. When you run a social media site, the limitless scalability of Wasabi is critical for our mission-critical systems since it ensures tha...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Wasabi?

If any features are enhanced, that will be a very big deal. Wasabi is very easy to implement and didn't take any time at all to implement. We decided to switch to Wasabi primarily due to cost, foll...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 Glacier vs IBM SoftLayer

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon S3 vs IBM SoftLayer

Compared 22% of the time

Oracle Cloud Software Appliance vs IBM SoftLayer

Compared 22% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage MP B10000 vs IBM SoftLayer

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon AWS vs IBM SoftLayer

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM SoftLayer Competitors

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 25% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Wasabi

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Wasabi

Compared 19% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Block Storage vs Wasabi

Compared 5% of the time

More Wasabi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

March 2026

Download IBM SoftLayer product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

March 2026

Download Wasabi product report

Also Known As

CloudLayer

No data available

Overview

SoftLayer provides cloud infrastructure as a service from a growing number of data centers and network points of presence around the world. Our customers range from Web startups to global enterprises.

Products and services include bare metal and virtual servers, networking, turnkey big data solutions, private cloud solutions, and more. Our unique advantages include the industry's first Network-Within-a-Network topology for true out-of-band access, and an easy-to-use customer portal and robust API for full remote-access of all product and service management options.

IBM

Wasabi makes saving data simple, affordable, fast and secure. Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage removes the complicated decision of where, how and whether to save your data, and empowers you to transform your business and organization through cost savings and disruptive speed and performance.

Wasabi Technologies

Sample Customers

Whogohost Ltd., Skypicker, Infinity Computers and Communications Company, Grace Co. Ltd., Keyword, Uvionics Tech, Tennis Australia, immixGroup, Salesbox, Cxense ASA, Avnet Inc., Komsomolskaya Pravda, Seekr

FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet

Buyer's Guide

IBM SoftLayer vs. Wasabi

March 2026

Free Report: IBM SoftLayer vs. Wasabi

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM SoftLayer vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM SoftLayer vs. Wasabi report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.