We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Amazon S3 Glacier is a stable and scalable solution."
"The biggest advantage of the product is that AWS always copies the tool internally."
"The data archive feature is valuable."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a highly stable solution."
"It is a very comprehensive tool."
"We like that the price is cheaper."
"The reliability of storage is the main benefit."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution's cost optimization could be improved."
"I would like to see the retrieval time reduced."
"Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions."
"Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud."
"The pricing is a bit expensive. There is room for improvement in costs."
"They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price."
"I am unsure if the product provides good integration capabilities. From an improvement perspective, I want the tool to provide easier integration features."
"The product’s pricing must be improved."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The scalability could improve."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 5th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 35 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 8.6, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage and cost footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Amazon S3 Glacier is most compared with Google Cloud Storage Nearline, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 and Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
