Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud Storage vs Wasabi comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
Google Cloud Storage is valued for efficiency and reliability, but lacks cost-saving benefits compared to Azure, suggesting improvement areas.
Sentiment score
8.3
Wasabi offers cost-effective, easy setup storage with significant savings and frequent backup capabilities, proving highly valuable for users.
We can tell them that we are backing it up as frequently as they might need it.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
3.8
Most users are satisfied with Google Cloud Storage support despite some preferring more direct communication and regional variations.
Sentiment score
7.9
Wasabi offers responsive, effective support, with users praising fast responses and efficient problem resolution, especially for special inquiries.
We have self-studied to learn the services.
For SAP loads, Google provided a specific team, which resulted in good support.
I evaluate Wasabi's tech support as pretty effective; they set up live support instantly and did quite a lot quickly.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
5.8
Google Cloud Storage offers scalable solutions for various organizational sizes, praised for flexibility despite regional performance variations.
Sentiment score
7.8
Wasabi offers scalable, pay-as-you-go storage with easy integration, appealing to users despite being less scalable than Azure.
Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but there are limitations.
It is really easily scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Google Cloud Storage is reliable with high uptime, though minor reconfiguration issues occur, and users praise its global accessibility.
Sentiment score
9.1
Users highly rate Wasabi's reliability and performance, supported by vendor recommendations and no reported issues.
There was no direct experience with any instability during my involvement.
Wasabi is very reliable and very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Users seek improvements in speed, cost, capacity, interfaces, security, integration, and management for Google Cloud Storage.
Wasabi requires improved user management, file access, scalability, retention, data centers, app integration, and enhanced user reporting features.
They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches.
The most important improvement we would like to see in Wasabi is the ability to find files and folders easily on the platform, as it is not very easy at all right now.
 

Setup Cost

Google Cloud Storage offers competitive pricing, flexible plans, and regional promotions, though some users find SME costs could be lower.
Wasabi offers cost-effective, clear pricing for storage, significantly cheaper than AWS and Azure, with flexible payment options.
Google Cloud was cheaper compared to AWS and Azure.
Depending on your setup, Google Cloud Storage is economical, especially if you do not need high stability and scalability.
 

Valuable Features

Google Cloud Storage provides scalable, secure storage with seamless integration, robust performance, and ease of use across multiple devices.
Wasabi offers affordable, user-friendly storage with no fees, 99.9% uptime, easy Veeam integration, and superior video streaming.
The user interface of Google Cloud Storage is easy and consistent across all their products.
We do not experience any disruptions, and the service meets our needs and requirements.
We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable.
Wasabi's features of eliminating egress and API requests fees have ensured that we can run our social media sites without charging users for data, which increases the adoption of our platform.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
79
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (1st)
Wasabi
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Google Cloud Storage is 9.2%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wasabi is 6.4%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

Manimaran Tannimalai - PeerSpot reviewer
User interface consistency facilitates seamless project planning and design for specialized tasks
While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain niches. Google's strength lies in their adapted approach to specific tasks, as seen with SAP loads. Generally, their focus is widespread.
DavidWork - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers reliable and cost-effective backups with impressive stability
We use Wasabi to back up all of our WordPress sites. Anytime we have a new website, it's just easy to add it The cost is low, it is foolproof, and it has redundancy. We have never had an outage, and it is very reliable and stable. Since it is so inexpensive, it does not impact our profit…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
44%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Cloud Storage?
Google Cloud ( /products/google-cloud-reviews ) was cheaper compared to AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) and Azure ( /products/microsoft-azure-reviews ). AWS ( /products/amazon-aws-reviews ) wa...
What needs improvement with Google Cloud Storage?
While Google has made efforts to address SAP loads, the company lacks a product specialist focus. They cover a broad range of products, which might affect their ability to compete well in certain n...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Wasabi?
We can reserve capacities based on our usage expectations for two to three years. We can pay for it annually. It is quite easy for the organization. The pricing model is quite affordable. The price...
What needs improvement with Wasabi?
The most important improvement we would like to see in Wasabi is the ability to find files and folders easily on the platform, as it is not very easy at all right now.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Adobe 2. Airbnb 3. Amazon 4. Apple 5. AT&T 6. Baidu 7. Cisco 8. Coca-Cola 9. Dell 10. eBay 11. Facebook 12. Ford 13. Google 13. HP 14. IBM 15. Intel 16. JPMorgan Chase 17. LinkedIn 18. Lyft 19. Microsoft 20. Netflix 21. Nike 22. Oracle 23. PayPal 24. Pinterest 25. Qualcomm 26. SAP 27. Spotify 28. Tesla 29. Toyota 30. Twitter 31. Visa 32. Walmart 33. WeWork
FileShadow, Ivy League Schools, Russell Sage Colleges, Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, MayStreet
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.