We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is flexible and very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is the shared folder."
"The solution is easy to use."
"Everything I store in the solution is available on all of my devices."
"Google Cloud Storage is highly reliable."
"What I like most about Google Cloud Storage is that it's very stable, very quick, and very useful."
"Using this solution has improved the security of our data."
"The performance is good."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Google Cloud Storage is scalable, but you have to pay extra."
"The storage could be improved to manage it a bit better. Google Cloud Storage could be more secure, but the security features are okay."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"I would also like to be able to use my own tools and packages within this solution and also have a tool to visualize the data with graphics."
"I would like the storage to be less expensive."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"This solution could be improved by increasing integration with other tools, like Microsoft."
"The user experience needs to be simplified."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"The scalability could improve."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 11th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Google Workspace and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
