IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

IBM and Tricentis are both solutions in the Service Virtualization category. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...

Read 4 IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 112 Tricentis Tosca reviews

22,598 Views
226 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2025

Tricentis Tosca and IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] compete in software testing solutions. Tricentis Tosca leads in automation capabilities, while IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server[EOL] excels in virtualization for complex system testing.

Features: Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that enhances test design and execution efficiency across various applications. It supports scriptless automation, allowing users without coding skills to automate testing. It also provides comprehensive risk-based testing features. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] provides service virtualization, supporting comprehensive testing in distributed environments. It includes advanced support for IBM MQ, SWIFT validation, and flexible MQ recording configurations.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could improve in handling complex scenarios and integrating more smoothly with certain third-party tools. Its initial setup process can be challenging and might gain from better cost transparency. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] needs enhancements in user interface intuitiveness and simplifying its service virtualization setups. It could also benefit from more flexible licensing options and better integration with cloud services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca is recognized for its simplified deployment, enabling quick integration into existing systems, and offers extensive support documentation. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] requires a more complex setup but provides robust customer support to handle intricate virtualization environments.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca demands a higher initial investment but delivers substantial ROI by reducing testing time through automation. Conversely, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] may offer a lower initial price point, with its emphasis on resource conservation through virtualization contributing to cost savings by reducing dependency on physical test environments.

To learn more, read our detailed Service Virtualization Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Rational Test Virtualiz...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Service Virtualization (1st), Functional Testing Tools (1st), Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Featured Reviews

Rekha Chotara

IT Analyst at Tata Consultancy Services

Using service virtualization, we are able to accelerate the testing and development activity

As per my working experience over the last three and half years with RIT/RTVS, I would consider the two following areas of improvement: * Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria. * Implementing custom functions is a bit of a tedious job, as ECMAscript does not support some of the standard JavaScript functions. Also, the Script editor window is not user-friendly .

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has very easy and good validation techniques used for SWIFT, XSD, and WSDL validations."

"As we have used most of the MQ stub, "MQ recording" is the most useful feature."

"To me, what stands out the most about Tricentis Tosca is that even if I'm not a technical tester, I could pick up on how to use it very quickly because of the mechanisms of the tool, for example, its scanning mechanism. I'm not so technical, but I'm able to maneuver through Tricentis Tosca and derive capability. It's a user-friendly tool. It's not very complex."

"Overall, I rate Tricentis Tosca as a ten out of ten."

"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."

"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."

"The use of automation is most valuable."

"You can quickly build automated testing, manage it, and have it run on a regular basis to ensure that there are no issues."

"We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation."

"It is easy to maintain and easy to automate. No coding skills are required to automate. It is also easy in terms of transferring knowledge and skills. Many of my team members shifted over the past one and a half years, and there was no big issue with respect to knowledge sharing. It is a good tool that enables me to re-automate my scripts and update my scripts as quickly as possible. Looking at the amount of rework and maintenance activity that we had done for our scripts, it might have been a nightmare with some other scripting tool."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"Reporting: In the recent release of RCPT, the "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs improvements in terms of UI and timeline filtering criteria."

"User friendliness: I would rate it somewhere around 5/10 in terms of user-friendliness. It can be simpler to build stubs and middle-ware based test cases compared to the solution given by RTVS."

"Tricentis Tosca's performance could be better. Sometimes when we are remapping or when it is loading it can take a lot of time. There are free solutions that have better performance in this area."

"One thing to improve in Tricentis Tosca is that it's not compatible with Excel based forms. Another area for improvement is that the tool is not compatible with OpenText applications. The support and licensing cost for it also need improvement. The tool also needs cloud support, as it's currently on-premises only."

"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."

"It requires some coding customization that requires expertise."

"The product needs to improve its pricing. It also needs to improve the infrastructure and DEX agent setup."

"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."

"Tricentis Tosca’s technical support could be improved."

"When using it with iOS devices, I cannot start automation directly and must use a remote machine."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM RTVS is not that expensive compare to other giants, but it is still much ahead of some other tool having less features."

"The product has a free trial available, which has saves on the initial investment costs."

"They are probably more expensive than other comparable tools, but you also get the full suite of testing tools."

"The tool's pricing is lower than that of other automation tools."

"Tricentis Tosca is an expensive tool and the licensing is not simple."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the pricing a ten. The licensing model is based on a yearly basis."

"I am satisfied with the cost."

"It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools."

"Pricing could be better."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 9% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL]

August 2025

IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] report

Download IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

July 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Green Hat, IBM RTVS

Orchestrated Service Virtualization

Overview

Testing environments are often expensive and can have limited availability. IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server helps you shift testing to the left by removing dependencies on components that are unavailable or already in use. These components are simulated at the API layer, supporting a wide variety of technologies, allowing your team to test the riskiest elements earlier in the delivery lifecycle.

IBM

Tricentis Tosca offers model-based testing that supports both technical and non-technical users through a user-friendly interface, enabling scriptless automation and seamless integration with UI and non-UI applications.

Tosca's modular approach enhances test maintenance and reuse while delivering comprehensive automation for diverse testing environments. Backed by risk-based testing and automated data management, it supports end-to-end testing across API, SAP, and desktop applications. Tosca's integration capabilities extend to environments like Salesforce, PHP webshops, and mobile apps, effectively enhancing Agile team workflows. Despite its strengths, room remains for improved reporting, object recognition, and more efficient upgrade processes. Enhancing documentation and mobile testing support could further elevate its functionality for many.

What key features does Tricentis Tosca offer?

User-friendly interface: Simplifies interactions for non-technical users.
Model-based testing: Facilitates the easy creation of automated test cases.
Scriptless automation: Enables quick test development without coding.
Integration capabilities: Supports connections with multiple platforms like SAP and Salesforce.
Modular approach: Enhances the reuse and maintenance of test components.

What benefits to expect from Tricentis Tosca?

Efficiency: Streamlines the testing process for faster release cycles.
Versatility: Suitable for diverse application environments including web and desktop.
Productivity: Boosts Agile team integration for comprehensive testing.
Risk-based testing: Prioritizes testing efforts based on potential impact.

In retail, Tricentis Tosca automates inventory and transaction testing, ensuring efficient system updates. Financial services employ it for regulatory compliance through automated test scenarios in mainframe and PDF environments. Telecommunication companies utilize Tosca for API testing, aligning services across network platforms seamlessly.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Sandhata Technologies Ltd., Qantas Airways

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

Service Virtualization

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Broadcom, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.