No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hyland Content Innovation Cloud vs Make comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland Content Innovation C...
Ranking in Process Automation
64th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (56th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (54th), Agentic Automation (33rd), AI Customer Support (87th), AI Content Creation (39th)
Make
Ranking in Process Automation
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.5
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
AI Software Development (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Hyland Content Innovation Cloud?
Leave a review
FA
Chief Executive Officer at Ashtex Solutions
Flexibility and efficiency accelerate business processes
Make needs to put some focus on or clarify the security aspect in its documentation or website. When creating automation through these modules between two different applications, there should be clarity about whether the data is secure while passing through these automations or integrations created within Make. The pricing of Make at this point is through operations consumption, and it becomes really expensive in certain scenarios when iterations are involved. The operation consumption is too high and sometimes becomes a burden on the client. Make needs to review its pricing strategy since they have tough competition from n8n. Make sometimes has issues with user logins and data saving when simultaneously working on two different PCs or when two developers are working on something or some blueprint. It can lose saved data from one interface to the other, and when logging on with the same user on another workstation, it occasionally misbehaves. We were unaware that Make had its own local implementation module. They need to advertise this feature more effectively as we are developing many projects in Make and working with various clients.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Non Tech Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business13
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Make?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that the cost is effective and licensing was affordable.
What needs improvement with Make?
Make could be improved by having more platforms and connections that we would like to use, as well as more flexibility in paying for operations, with tasks on a sliding scale instead of by tier.Fur...
What is your primary use case for Make?
My main use case for Make is that it serves as a perfect tool to interlace most of our API connections, syncing different environments together. Make enables us to connect apps that lack native int...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Integromat
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Buan Consulting, Armadia
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: March 2026.
885,728 professionals have used our research since 2012.