Hitachi NAS Platform vs NetApp Private Storage comparison

Hitachi Vantara and NetApp are both solutions in the NAS category. Hitachi Vantara is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0, while NetApp is ranked #17. Hitachi Vantara holds a 2.5% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hitachi Vantara users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Hitachi NAS Platform

Read 12 Hitachi NAS Platform reviews

789 Views
789 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Private Storage

Read 15 NetApp Private Storage reviews

452 Views
452 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hitachi NAS Platform

NetApp Private Storage

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

Hitachi NAS Platform and NetApp Private Storage compete in the network-attached storage market. Hitachi NAS Platform is recognized for its cost-effectiveness and supportive customer service, while NetApp Private Storage is preferred for its advanced features and data protection capabilities.

Features: Hitachi NAS Platform offers robust scalability, efficient storage management, and reliable performance for growing data needs. NetApp Private Storage provides excellent data protection, seamless cloud integration, and flexible configuration options.

Room for Improvement: Hitachi NAS Platform could enhance its data protection features, integrate better with cloud environments, and simplify its user interface. NetApp Private Storage could focus on reducing setup complexity, improving initial speed and performance, and offering more competitive pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hitachi NAS Platform is praised for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer service aiding quick implementation. NetApp Private Storage, while requiring a more complex setup, offers a versatile deployment model with responsive customer service aiding the hybrid cloud environment.

Pricing and ROI: Hitachi NAS Platform is more affordable, offering a faster ROI suited for businesses seeking cost-efficiency. NetApp Private Storage, although at a higher price point, provides long-term benefits and ROI through its comprehensive feature set and flexibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 872,846 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hitachi NAS Platform

Ranking in NAS

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Private Storage

Ranking in NAS

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the NAS category, the mindshare of Hitachi NAS Platform is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Private Storage is 2.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Hitachi NAS Platform	2.5%
NetApp Private Storage	2.3%
Other	95.2%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Mir Gulzar Ahmed

IT Manager at Synergy Computers

Needs standalone functionality but provides a robust NAS solution for existing SAN environments

I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity. The current solution only suits customers who already have a Hitachi SAN environment and want to add NAS protocols like NFS and CIFS. It's not suitable for customers without an existing SAN, as they would first need to acquire the SAN infrastructure before adding NAS functionality.

Read full review

Atilla Celiloglu

Broadcast Technology Director at tv8

Has supported continuous broadcasting with reliable performance and consistent operations

They can make more solutions for cloud integration in NetApp Private Storage. It should be easier to use the cloud S3 integration, maybe from a NetApp interface, where users can choose the type of storage before sending to S3. I would like to see more audit and performance logs via cloud integrations and ONTAP. Without the need for separate software.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The Hitachi storage platform is highly scalable and highly available."

"Hitachi is reliable with high availability and solid performance. It performs well regardless of the workload."

"It creates a NAS environment on top of Hitachi SAN, which facilitates customers who need NAS protocols along with their existing SAN portfolio."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle a high number of users while maintaining both stability and performance."

"Hitachi NAS has improved my storage operations significantly."

"The reliability and scalability of Hitachi NAS Platform are valuable features."

"There are no other NAS in the current market that can compete with Hitachi in terms of performance."

More Hitachi NAS Platform pros

"The most valuable feature of NetApp Private Storage is out-of-the-box integration with the SAN switches. They are much easier compared to Dell solutions. Additionally, the connector that comes with the solution that allows connection back to the Cisco SAN switches is very good. In Dell, I would need to use an FCIP or CIP port that is required."

"NetApp has its own dedicated operating system, so it will not be affected by any wireless piggybacking or malware. That's the beauty of NetApp's operating system."

"Disaster recovery. And I like the security very much. I think they have the needed options for security. Can manage NPS using the same tools and process that we use today."

"At the moment, we are extensively using SnapMirror."

"NetApp has really added a lot of features over the years to improve the product and performance. They can do things now like control ingress. They can control egress."

"The most valuable feature is integration."

"Very stable and very scalable."

"It gave us a platform which could clearly arrange all our files and volumes."

More NetApp Private Storage pros

Cons

"There are insufficient improvements in certain areas."

"I would suggest that Hitachi make a NAS box that can work independently, without relying on SAN connectivity."

"For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight."

"Hitachi NAS Platform needs to improve by offering a unified storage solution. Due to budget constraints in regions like Southeast Asia, customers prefer a single machine that can handle all problems, which the current platform does not provide."

"I would like to see the inclusion of support for cloud-connectivity to providers like AWS."

"The Hitachi NAS Platform is too complicated, not simple, and not cost-effective, sometimes being inappropriate for most situations."

"The monitoring tool is not well developed."

"I encounter challenges while installing the upgrades for the product."

More Hitachi NAS Platform cons

"The solution could improve by having better support experts. For example, they do not have clear instructions on configuration."

"I would like to have the Active-Active feature. Some competitors already have it. I would like NetApp to add it to stay competitive."

"I'm not sure how easy it is to use on the cloud versus on-prem. If they have different user experiences, they should work to make the two as similar as possible to make it easy for a user to understand both even if they only deal mainly with one."

"They can make more solutions for cloud integration in NetApp Private Storage. It should be easier to use the cloud S3 integration, maybe from a NetApp interface, where users can choose the type of storage before sending to S3."

"The users find the new version's GUI complicated to use."

"NetApp Private Storage is still integrated into the ISCSI connectivity and the FC protocol. I would recommend them to migrate to the FCIP because the SAN switches are moving further to an FCIP, and are scaling out of the ISCSI connectivity. Sooner or later, that will be an issue for NetApp Private Storage. An NFCIP should be available to them moving three years down the line."

"There may actually be so many features that the end-user gets lost in the volume."

"There is room for improvement in the support. It has been a problem for our team."

More NetApp Private Storage cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Hitachi NAS Platform’s price is high and depends on SCSI disc capacity."

"Costs are based on the features and it is a considerable amount."

"This solution is priced well and there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"It is a highly-priced product."

"I would rate the solution's pricing six to seven out of ten."

"NetApp Private Storage is cheaper here in India compared to other solutions, such as Dell."

"The price of NetApp Private Storage is similar to other solutions. There is typically an annual license required for this solution."

"We negotiate whatever deal we can get on the type of storage that it is, but it's totally under our control,."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The product is costly."

"The price could be lower."

"In general, I am pleased with the pricing, though it is a little high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hiachi NAS Platform?

The pricing for the Hitachi NAS is higher compared to other NAS solutions since the NAS protocol is provided on top of the existing SAN environment, requiring an additional device for NAS functiona...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hiachi NAS Platform?

For the Hitachi NAS Platform, the tools are basic and don't provide much insight. They can continue to improve the interface to keep it up-to-date, and maybe add some new features or better ways of...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hiachi NAS Platform?

We sell the Hitachi NAS Platform, and it is the best product for our customers. I sell it to banks, telecom companies, and other enterprises at the enterprise level. We have a cluster with Hitachi ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Private Storage?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Private Storage?

It consists of a large production company and national television channels broadcasting 24/7. We wanted to choose a stable product with flawless SLA levels for an organization that broadcasts 24/7....

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering NetApp Private Storage?

I believe it will deliver the expected performance and stability for television channels and production studios. On a scale of 1-10, I rate NetApp Private Storage an 8.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 37% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 20% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 16% of the time

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 8% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Hitachi NAS Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Hitachi NAS Platform Competitors

Dell PowerScale (Isilon) vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 32% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 20% of the time

QNAP NAS Storage vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 18% of the time

Qumulo vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 9% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs NetApp Private Storage

Compared 7% of the time

More NetApp Private Storage Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NAS

October 2025

Download Hitachi NAS Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Private Storage

October 2025

Download NetApp Private Storage product report

Also Known As

Hitachi NAS

NPS

Overview

Hitachi NAS Platforms help you with file sharing, file server consolidation and application storage for Oracle, Microsoft and virtual environments. Deploy the highest performance per node in the industry. Apply capacity efficiencies that let you actually do more, but with a lot less. Realize significant cost savings for your organization.

Hitachi Vantara

NetApp Private Storage (NPS) for Cloud is a family of enterprise storage solutions that lets you use multiple industry-leading clouds and maintain complete control over your data on dedicated storage systems from NetApp.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Intersect Australia

ASE IT, Concerto Cloud

Buyer's Guide

Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage

November 2025

Free Report: Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage

Find out what your peers are saying about Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

872,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hitachi NAS Platform vs. NetApp Private Storage report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.