• Home
  • Bazel vs. Jenkins

Bazel vs Jenkins comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bazel Logo

Bazel

691 views|655 comparisons
Jenkins Logo

Jenkins

Read 83 Jenkins reviews
6,896 views|5,921 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Build Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bazel and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Bazel?
Anonymous User
Helps with continuous integration but onboarding could be smoother
Jenkins helps to maintain continuous integration whenever we make changes in the code and to deploy the code whenever we do any check-ins.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."

    • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very easy… more »
    What do you like most about Jenkins?
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Read all 42 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?
    Top Answer:It is an open source.
    Read all 28 answers   →
    Ranking
    18th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    691
    Comparisons
    655
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,896
    Comparisons
    5,921
    Reviews
    39
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Nx logo
    Nx vs. Bazel
    Compared 39% of the time.
    Incredibuild logo
    Incredibuild vs. Bazel
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Tekton vs. Bazel
    Compared 7% of the time.
    GNU Make logo
    GNU Make vs. Bazel
    Compared 5% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    GitLab vs. Bazel
    Compared 5% of the time.
    More Bazel Competitors   →
    GitLab logo
    GitLab vs. Jenkins
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Bamboo logo
    Bamboo vs. Jenkins
    Compared 14% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    AWS CodePipeline vs. Jenkins
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    IBM Rational Build Forge vs. Jenkins
    Compared 7% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    TeamCity vs. Jenkins
    Compared 4% of the time.
    More Jenkins Competitors   →
    Learn More
    Bazel
    Video Not Available
    Jenkins
    Overview

    From startup to enterprise, choose the Bazel open source project to build and test your multi-language, multi-platform projects.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Google and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bazel is ranked 18th in Build Automation while Jenkins is ranked 2nd in Build Automation with 83 reviews. Bazel is rated 0.0, while Jenkins is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jenkins writes "A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment". Bazel is most compared with Nx, Incredibuild, Tekton, GNU Make and GitLab, whereas Jenkins is most compared with GitLab, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, IBM Rational Build Forge and TeamCity.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.