it specialist at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2024-10-31T07:47:00Z
Oct 31, 2024
I do not have extensive knowledge on the pricing or licensing aspect as I used Jenkins for free at the local machine level. However, it is generally regarded as cost-effective.
Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-07-18T08:33:50Z
Jul 18, 2023
The product is expensive. The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. Additionally, we have to pay for the product’s support.
Facilities And Administration at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech
Real User
2022-06-16T14:50:01Z
Jun 16, 2022
One good thing about Jenkins is there are two flavors. One is open-source and the other is the commercial or the enterprise edition. The open-source version is pretty stable. For the security concern, you can add your own security-related intervention to make it that much more secure. For the enterprise edition, you have a cloud-based which actually provides the commercial Jenkins version. Apart from security, they have come up with upgraded versions of Jenkins, for example, Jenkins Access Control and Jenkins Two-point Access Control. You can get added all kinds of features and the ease of implementing or managing your product. As I mentioned, Jenkins open-source is actually more stable and mature if you compare it to the enterprise version.
Cloud Security Engineer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Real User
2021-12-19T18:52:00Z
Dec 19, 2021
We used the free version. We didn't need anything specific on the support side for that. It's totally customizable, and if you get so much good out of an open-source project, then you don't need to go for any support model. That was quite good, and community support has been good enough for us.
Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.
I do not have extensive knowledge on the pricing or licensing aspect as I used Jenkins for free at the local machine level. However, it is generally regarded as cost-effective.
Jenkins is open source and free to use. You simply download it, install it on your server, and it manages your pipelines.
The tool is open-source.
It is an open source.
Jenkins is an open-source platform.
This is not open source. It's price-based, for example, premium-based.
We use the tool's free version.
It is a cheap solution.
We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support.
The product is expensive. The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. Additionally, we have to pay for the product’s support.
Jenkins is an open-source tool.
In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution.
The solution is open-source.
Licensing is not my domain. I can't speak to the exact costs.
The solution is open source.
Jenkins is open-source, so it is free.
Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced.
Jenkins is a free solution, it is open source.
We are using the free version of Jenkins. There are no costs or licensing.
One good thing about Jenkins is there are two flavors. One is open-source and the other is the commercial or the enterprise edition. The open-source version is pretty stable. For the security concern, you can add your own security-related intervention to make it that much more secure. For the enterprise edition, you have a cloud-based which actually provides the commercial Jenkins version. Apart from security, they have come up with upgraded versions of Jenkins, for example, Jenkins Access Control and Jenkins Two-point Access Control. You can get added all kinds of features and the ease of implementing or managing your product. As I mentioned, Jenkins open-source is actually more stable and mature if you compare it to the enterprise version.
We are using the freeware version of Jenkins.
The product is open-source.
Jenkins is completely open source.
We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source.
We used the free version. We didn't need anything specific on the support side for that. It's totally customizable, and if you get so much good out of an open-source project, then you don't need to go for any support model. That was quite good, and community support has been good enough for us.
We have a license contract with Jenkins.
Jenkins is a free open-source server.
It could be cheaper because there are many solutions available in the market. We are paying yearly.
The solution is one of the lowest costs compared to competitors.
There is no cost. It is open source.
Jenkins is open source and free.