We performed a comparison between Gurucul Next Gen SIEM and Logpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Gurucul Next Gen SIEM stands out for its user-friendliness, making it accessible to business users."
"The customization of reporting rules, reporting configuration, and alerting configuration are good."
"Technical support is responsive and very friendly."
"We like the user and entity behaviour analytics (UEBA) and find it valuable."
"They basically charge you in a better way."
"The solution's user interface is quite simple, and the integration is better than other products."
"The product is easy to use."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the combination of the software and the support that they have."
"Log collection, dashboards and reporting are good."
"It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. LogPoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parseable because all logs are not the same, but with LogPoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them."
"I would like Gurucul to identify the use cases that have already been reviewed by someone when detection occurs."
"The user interface could be made simpler."
"The solution should offer more integrations and third-party solutions like incident response platforms or allow access to third-party big data"
"One of the things we faced last year was that we had some memory issues with the server running. We were running them as virtual services, and we were facing some performance issues. Back then, there were some things that had already been solved at the end, but one of the small issues we had was that it was quite memory-consuming. After one upgrade that we did, we faced some performance issues."
"What could be improved in LogPoint is its UI because it's less friendly to users than LogRhythm. The UI could be more aesthetically appealing to users. It's completely outdated."
"We were missing visuals and graphics. Recently, a new version seems to have come out, and it has a new graphical user interface. When I was integrating it, it was usable, but the GUI needed improvement."
"LogPoint must find a way to integrate the servers without agents."
"Sometimes, the product is not stable."
"Logpoint is not flexible. Its documentation is not user-friendly."
"In terms of functionality, it is very good. The only issue is the documentation. Its documentation should be improved."
Gurucul Next Gen SIEM is ranked 40th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 2 reviews while Logpoint is ranked 26th in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 20 reviews. Gurucul Next Gen SIEM is rated 7.0, while Logpoint is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Gurucul Next Gen SIEM writes "Has a strong technical foundation and helps reduce our detection time, but the UI can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Logpoint writes "Good technical support but it is complex to use and resource-heavy". Gurucul Next Gen SIEM is most compared with , whereas Logpoint is most compared with IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Microsoft Sentinel and Wazuh. See our Gurucul Next Gen SIEM vs. Logpoint report.
See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.