

ThreatLocker and GoodAccess compete in the cybersecurity and VPN sectors, respectively. ThreatLocker holds a slight advantage due to its comprehensive security features and user control enhancements.
Features: ThreatLocker offers learning mode, application control, and ring-fencing, all of which block unauthorized applications and enhance security. GoodAccess provides robust VPN services with point-to-point connections, static IPs, and threat alerts, ensuring reliable performance across various operating systems.
Room for Improvement: ThreatLocker could improve by offering flexible training schedules, a more intuitive user interface, and thorough PSA integrations. GoodAccess should expand interface details and server coverage and adjust pricing strategies to suit diverse team sizes better.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThreatLocker supports multiple environments, including on-premise and various cloud setups, and offers excellent customer support with immediate response and advanced assistance. GoodAccess provides easy cloud-based deployment and simplicity in VPN setup, garnering positive feedback for its ease of use and efficiency.
Pricing and ROI: ThreatLocker has justified pricing due to its complete security suite, which reduces operational costs. Its upfront cost may seem high, but the return on investment from enhanced security is worthwhile. GoodAccess, while slightly more expensive for advanced features, is valued for its straightforward licensing and dependable security, which justifies its cost through streamlined operations.
If something were to happen without ThreatLocker, the cost would be huge, and thus, having it is definitely worth it.
The main return on investment is peace of mind, knowing that with ThreatLocker on any endpoint, it will almost always block all malicious code or exploits, even zero-day exploits.
It keeps malware, Trojans, and ransomware at bay.
They have been very responsive, helpful, and knowledgeable.
I would rate their customer support a ten out of ten.
Their support is world-class.
I started off with just the servers, and within a month and a half, I set up the entire company with ThreatLocker.
It seems to primarily operate on the endpoints rather than at a central location pushing out policies.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
For five years, we have not had a problem.
Once deployed, it downloads the policies locally, so even if the computer doesn't have internet, it doesn't matter.
It has been very stable, reliable, and accessible.
I would like to see more options and more granular controls for users who know what they are doing as an administrator.
Controlling the cloud environment, not just endpoints, is crucial.
This is problematic when immediate attention is needed.
Comprehensive 24-hour log monitoring is a valuable enhancement for both business and enterprise-level users.
After conversations with other partners, it became clear we underpriced it initially, which caused most of our issues.
We are moving towards the Unified solution, where they basically bundle everything together, providing us better stability with the ability to bring in new product offerings without having to go back to the customer and say, 'This is going to cost you.'
I had a really good deal at the time, and it continues to be cost-effective.
GoodAccess has positively impacted my organization as we have fewer IPs to whitelist and limited access for anybody outside of our organization into our internal systems.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform's ability to block access to unauthorized applications has been excellent.
It protects our customers.
The major benefit is fewer breaches overall, as nothing can be run without prior approval. This helps my company protect its data and secure itself effectively.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 3.1% |
| GoodAccess | 1.1% |
| Other | 95.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 21 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 32 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform designed for medium-sized enterprises to implement Zero Trust Architecture efficiently, offering a rapid, hardware-free deployment that integrates smoothly with existing infrastructures.
GoodAccess provides organizations a powerful means to secure their networks through a scalable zero-trust cybersecurity platform. It supports remote and hybrid work environments by protecting critical assets and enabling seamless connectivity. This platform ensures robust security, facilitating compliance with the latest standards while integrating with SaaS and legacy systems. Businesses with 50 to 5000 employees across several industries benefit from its advanced capabilities, which include device security, multi-factor authentication, and identity-based access control.
What are the key features of GoodAccess?GoodAccess is widely implemented across industries needing secure, adaptable connectivity. It is ideal for sectors prioritizing remote and hybrid workforces, like tech and professional services, ensuring seamless access and compliance with complex regulatory requirements. Companies benefit from its application in controlling geolocation requirements, facilitating secure video conferencing, and ensuring high-speed access regardless of location.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.