GitHub Code Scanning vs SiteLock comparison

GitHub and SiteLock are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. GitHub is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.3, while SiteLock is ranked #57. GitHub holds a 1.0% mindshare in SAST, compared to SiteLock’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of SiteLock users who would recommend it.

GitHub Code Scanning

Read 3 GitHub Code Scanning reviews

676 Views
585 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SiteLock

Read 3 SiteLock reviews

59 Views
43 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

GitHub Code Scanning

SiteLock

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

SiteLock and GitHub Code Scanning operate in web security and code analysis. GitHub Code Scanning holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive features enhancing code security, despite SiteLock's favorable pricing and support.

Features: SiteLock is known for its ease of setup, effective malware scanning, and cost-efficiency. GitHub Code Scanning offers deep integration with development workflows, advanced code analysis, and the ability to detect complex vulnerabilities, preferred by development teams.

Room for Improvement: SiteLock could enhance reporting, reduce false positives, and improve scalability. GitHub Code Scanning may benefit from better integration with third-party tools, more comprehensive documentation, and simplified configuration processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SiteLock's deployment is straightforward with responsive customer support. GitHub Code Scanning has a challenging setup, yet it provides effective support for tech-savvy users handling complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: SiteLock offers cost-effective solutions for small businesses, providing significant value. GitHub Code Scanning, although priced higher, is seen as a worthy investment for its extensive security features, delivering ROI through enhanced long-term security and development efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Code Scanning vs. SiteLock Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. SiteLock

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Code Scanning

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SiteLock

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

57th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (19th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (37th), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (27th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of GitHub Code Scanning is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SiteLock is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

VishalSingh

Consulting & Solutions, BA/BD in Enterprise IT on Open Source, Red Hat & EDB at KEEN AND ABLE COMPUTERS PVT LTD

Traverses the entire network, scanning every system to determine which ports are open

You can use the tool locally on your system or in the cloud. I rate it a nine out of ten. It's a very good tool for people who want to start using GitHubCode Scanning, especially for software development or team collaboration. GitHubCode Scanning allows teams to collaborate by uploading files to repositories. For example, if someone is developing an application, they can host the code on GitHub Code Scanning. Other developers can then download the code for testing purposes. If bugs are found, fixes can be applied using the GitHub Code Scanningrepository, and everyone on the team can see the changes. Software developers often use GitHub Code Scanning for version control, and it's essential for CI/CD pipelines to work.

Read full review

it_user274983

Senior Accounts Payable Representative at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Not only did its website scanner find my website's security issues, but I was also able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches.

Website scanner I run several personal websites and after getting hacked on one of them I found SiteLock. Not only did SiteLock's website scanner find the issue with my website, but with SiteLock I was able to implement a security system to prevent future breaches. None that I could find. 6…

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Code Scanning?

We use GitHub Code Scanning mostly for source code management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Code Scanning?

The minimum pricing for the tool is five dollars a month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Code Scanning?

One area for improvement could be the ability to have an AI system digest the reports generated from code scanning and provide a summary. Currently, the reports can be extensive, and users may over...

See all answers

What do you recommend for a securing Web Application?

In addition to Sitelock and Immuniweb, another option to consider for a 24/7 automated vulnerability monitoring tool to protect web applications is Modshield SB Modshield SB is a web application fi...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 34% of the time

Coverity vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 29% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 15% of the time

Aikido Security vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

Polaris Software Integrity Platform vs GitHub Code Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Code Scanning Competitors

Sucuri vs SiteLock

Compared 31% of the time

Cloudflare vs SiteLock

Compared 30% of the time

Imperva DDoS vs SiteLock

Compared 24% of the time

Veracode vs SiteLock

Compared 15% of the time

More SiteLock Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

April 2025

Download GitHub Code Scanning product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

March 2025

Download SiteLock product report

Overview

Code scanning is a feature that you use to analyze the code in a GitHub repository to find security vulnerabilities and coding errors. Any problems identified by the analysis are shown in GitHub.

GitHub

Real website security means protection from the inside out as well as the outside in. SiteLock does it all -- daily scanning, automatic malware removal, web app firewall, a global CDN for a blazingly fast website and our support team is here for you 24/7. Our dynamic Trust Seal shows visitors your website is safe, increasing conversions and ROI.

SiteLock

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

galaxyguitar.com, robertasinc.com, indiarunning.com, comprarenpr.com, idbasolutions.com, newgrip.com

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Code Scanning vs. SiteLock

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub Code Scanning vs. SiteLock

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Code Scanning vs. SiteLock and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Code Scanning vs. SiteLock report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.