GitGuardian Platform vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services comparison

GitGuardian and Kaspersky are both solutions in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category. GitGuardian is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.8, while Kaspersky is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.0. GitGuardian holds a 1.1% mindshare in TIPT, compared to Kaspersky’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitGuardian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Kaspersky users who would recommend it.

GitGuardian Platform

Read 32 GitGuardian Platform reviews

5,822 Views
873 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Kaspersky Threat Intelligen...

Read 2 Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services reviews

604 Views
592 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

GitGuardian Platform

Kaspersky Threat Intelligen...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 2, 2025

Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services and GitGuardian Platform compete in cybersecurity infrastructure enhancement. GitGuardian seems to lead with its robust feature set aimed at development environments.

Features: Kaspersky offers extensive threat data aggregation, delivering insights for improved threat detection and response. GitGuardian focuses on real-time monitoring and detection of secrets in code, with seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines, enhancing code safety and compliance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kaspersky is known for a streamlined deployment process and comprehensive customer support. GitGuardian's cloud-based model simplifies implementation, and its clarity in guidance during setup is well-received.

Pricing and ROI: Initial setup for Kaspersky tends to be more economical, offering good value over time. GitGuardian, despite higher costs, delivers strong features that reduce security breaches, providing substantial ROI long-term.

To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Platform vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitGuardian Platform

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (4th), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Software Supply Chain Security (5th), DevSecOps (4th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Kaspersky Threat Intelligen...

Ranking in Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

25th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) category, the mindshare of GitGuardian Platform is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitGuardian Platform	1.1%
Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services	1.3%
Other	97.6%

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

Featured Reviews

Ney Roman

DevOps Engineer at Deuna App

Facilitates efficient secret management and improves development processes

Regarding the exceptions in GitGuardian Platform, we know that within the platform we have a way to accept a path or a directory from a repository, but it is not that visible at the very beginning. You have to figure out where to search for it, and once you have it, it is really good, but it is not that visible at the beginning. This should be made more exposed. The documentation could be better because it was not that comprehensively documented. When we started working with GitGuardian Platform, it was difficult to find some specific use cases, and we were not aware of that. It might have improved now, but at that time, it was not something we would recommend.

Read full review

Abdelrahman Hussein

CTI & Threat Hunter at Telecom Egypt

Provides useful real-time threat intelligence features but has limited capabilities

We use the product to search for IoCs. It is a good tool, but we do not use all its capabilities. We have only done a POC of the product. The real-time threat intelligence features are useful. The tool has good capabilities. It has a database of IoCs The solution is limited. I have been using…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of GitGuardian is that it finds tokens and passwords. That's why we need this tool. It minimizes the possibility of security violations that we cannot find on our own."

"What I appreciate the most about GitGuardian Platform is its efficiency when triggering our pipeline and notifying us if secrets have been exposed, such as APIs, variables, our database, or anything being exposed."

"You can also assign tasks to specific teams or people to complete, such as assigning something to the "blue team" or saying that this person needs to do this, and that person needs to do that. That is a great feature because you can actually manage your team internally in GitGuardian."

"The entire GitGuardian solution is valuable. The product is doing its job and showing us many things. We get many false positives, but the ability to automatically display potential leaks when developers commit is valuable. The dashboards show you recent and historical commits, and we have a full scan that shows historical leaked secrets."

"It's fantastic. We have checked a couple of other vendors and seen their results, which are quite inferior to the amount of detail that the GitGuardian Platform provides. With instantaneous notifications connected to our Slack platform, it allows us to deal quickly with incidents."

"A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically. This results in issues being resolved within minutes, saving significant effort from the security team in tracking down or communicating with developers."

"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."

"GitGuardian has helped to increase our security team's productivity. Now, we don't need to call the developers all the time and ask what they are working on. I feel the solution bridged the gap between our team and the developers, which is really great. I feel that we need that in our company, since some of the departments are just doing whatever and you don't know what they are doing. I think GitGuardian does a good job of bridging the gap. It saves us about 10 hours per week."

More GitGuardian Platform pros

"The real-time threat intelligence features are useful."

"The solution improved our overall security posture."

Cons

"One improvement that I'd like to see is a cleaner for Splunk logs. It would be nice to have a middle man for anything we send or receive from Splunk forwarders. I'd love to see it get cleaned by GitGuardian or caught to make sure we don't have any secrets getting committed to Splunk logs."

"Automated Jira tickets would be fantastic. At the moment, I believe we have to go in and click to create a Jira ticket. It would be nice to automate."

"The analytics in GitGuardian Platform have a significant opportunity to better reflect the value provided to security teams and demonstrate actual activity occurring. While the self-healing capability and proactive developer actions are important features, the analytics do not provide information around this activity."

"There has been a little bit of downtime of late, and it has been reasonably impactful when it's not been scanning."

"There is room for improvement in GitGuardian on Azure DevOps. The implementation is a bit hard there. This is one of the things we requested help with. I would not say their support is not good, but they need them to improve in helping customers on that side."

"GitGuardian's hook and dashboard scanners are the two entities. They should work together as one. We've seen several discrepancies where the hook is not being flagged on the dashboard. I still think they need to do some fine-tuning around that. We don't want to waste time."

"GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives."

"They could give a developer access to a dashboard for their team's repositories that just shows their repository secrets. I think more could be exposed to developers."

More GitGuardian Platform cons

"More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial."

"The solution is limited."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is reasonable. GitGuardian is one of the most recent security tools we've adopted. When it came time to renew it, there was no doubt about it. It is licensed per developer, so it scales nicely with the number of repos that we have. We can create new repositories and break up work. It isn't scaling based on the amount of data it's consuming."

"I compared the solution to a couple of other solutions, and I think it is very competitively priced."

"It could be cheaper. When GitHub secrets monitoring solution goes to general access and general availability, GitGuardian might be in a little bit of trouble from the competition, and maybe then they might lower their prices. The GitGuardian solution is great. I'm just concerned that they're not GitHub."

"I am only aware of the base price. I do not know what happened with our purchasing team in discussions with GitGuardian. I was not privy to the overall contract, but in terms of the base MSRP price, I found it reasonable."

"It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool."

"The pricing for GitGuardian is fair."

"The internal side is cheap per user. It is annual pricing based on the number of users."

"It's a little bit expensive."

More GitGuardian Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Healthcare Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's also worth mentioning that GitGuardian is unique because they have a free tier that we've been using for the first twelve months. It provides full functionality for smaller teams. We're a smal...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

It's competitively priced compared to others. Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitGuardian Internal Monitoring ?

GitGuardian Platform does what it is designed to do, but it still generates many false positives. We utilize the automated playbooks from GitGuardian Platform, and we are enhancing them. We will pr...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services?

The real-time threat intelligence features are useful.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services?

More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial. So, to include everything i...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services?

I recommend the solutions. We use them in different sectors.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

SafeGuard Cyber Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs GitGuardian Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More GitGuardian Platform Competitors

Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

Compared 29% of the time

VirusTotal vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

Compared 21% of the time

Tenable One Exposure Management Platform vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

Compared 19% of the time

Recorded Future vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

Compared 15% of the time

More Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform

January 2026

Download GitGuardian Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP)

December 2025

Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services report

Download Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services product report

Also Known As

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, GitGuardian Public Monitoring

Kaspersky Threat Intelligence

Interactive Demo

GitGuardian

Demo not available

Kaspersky

Overview

GitGuardian is a comprehensive platform focused on enhancing Non-Human Identity security by integrating Secrets Security and Secrets Observability to detect and manage secrets across development environments.

As cybersecurity threats increasingly target NHIs like service accounts and applications, GitGuardian offers a robust solution by supporting over 450 types of secrets and deploying honeytokens for additional defense. Trusted by leading organizations and developers, its monitoring and quick alert system enable effective detection and management of sensitive data, strengthening operational security across platforms.

What are the key features of GitGuardian?

Secrets Detection: Identifies various secrets types such as AWS keys and passwords.
Quick Alerts: Provides timely notifications for immediate risk management.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with development tools and workflows.
Dev in the Loop: Facilitates rapid issue resolution.
Historical Scanning: Enhances security through thorough scanning practices.

What benefits and ROI should companies consider?

Efficiency: Streamlined remediation processes with minimal false positives.
Customizability: Adaptable detection features cater to specific needs.
Risk Reduction: Proactive management of sensitive data threats.
Team Integration: Improved collaboration through connected workflows.
Development Continuity: Maintains seamless operation during security processes.

In the tech industry, GitGuardian is employed to safeguard APIs and sensitive credentials across code repositories like GitHub. Companies benefit from instant alerts and integrations with tools like Slack, effectively managing risks and enhancing security policies. While popular in sectors dependent on development agility, there is room for further improvement in customization and integration to meet specific industry needs.

GitGuardian

Counteracting modern cyberthreats requires a 360-degree view of the tactics and tools used by threat actors. Generating this intelligence and identifying the most effective countermeasures requires constant dedication and high levels of expertise. With petabytes of rich threat data to mine, advanced machine-learning technologies and a unique pool of world experts, we at Kaspersky Lab work to support you with the latest threat intelligence from all around the world, helping you maintain immunity to even previously unseen cyber-attacks.

Kaspersky

Sample Customers

Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by over 600 thousand developers and leading companies, including Snowflake, Orange, Iress, Mirantis, Maven Wave, ING, BASF, and Bouygues Telecom.

Telefonica, VimpelCom, Monclick, Ezenta

Buyer's Guide

GitGuardian Platform vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

December 2025

Free Report: GitGuardian Platform vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Platform vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitGuardian Platform vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services report.

See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.