Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL] vs IBM Resilient comparison

Diligent and IBM are both solutions in the Security Incident Response category. Additionally, 100% of Diligent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL]

Read 1 Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

IBM Resilient

Read 18 IBM Resilient reviews

1,745 Views
506 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL]

IBM Resilient

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL] and IBM Resilient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Trellix, Proofpoint and others in Security Incident Response.

To learn more, read our detailed Security Incident Response Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Security Incident Response

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,955 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL]

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Resilient

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Incident Response (5th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (20th)

Featured Reviews

Daniel Eakin

Information Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI

Sadly, I can’t provide specific examples due to the nature of the content of the improvements. I will say that, prior to implementation, and post-implementation, we saw a nearly 800% increase in volume of completed and correctly completed documentation in regards to specific tasks being completed. Rsam puts the workflow first, and lets the record follow it. It literally puts a task on rails and the person needing to do the work only need respond to the prompts accordingly and let Rsam automate the rest. The data is cleaner, more uniform, and there’s simply more of it created more quickly, as a result.

Read full review

ZaidHaddad

Technical Seller at Alawtad group

Suitable for different industries and ensures effective incident response

IBM Resilient is great in many aspects like its wide range of integrations and customizable playbooks. However, one thing to improve is how it handles data formats, which currently might require scripting for conversion to CSV before uploading. Despite this, it stands out for incident response, case management, task organization, and team collaboration, making it a strong choice for organizations compared to competitors like Demisto Palo Alto. When it comes to additional features, I think IBM Resilient is on the right track with its AI capabilities, like linking related incidents and providing recommended actions. It would be nice to see more enhancements in this area, but overall, it looks good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Rsam puts the workflow first, and lets the record follow it, literally putting a task on rails so the person needing to do the work only needs to respond to the prompts accordingly and let Rsam automate the rest."

"The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"The solution is reliable in our usage."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The solution is simple to use and to integrate with IBM QRadar."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"Its flexibility is the most valuable."

"This is a good solution that we recommend for customers."

"The integration with IBM SIM and the ability to block users during brute force attacks are particularly effective."

More IBM Resilient pros

Cons

"Hands down, if Rsam adopted a more industry proper "End of life – Deprecated – Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual."

"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."

"It is not very straightforward to set up custom integrations, especially with services like Azure. You need an additional server for integration."

"The implementation could be a bit simpler."

"IBM Resilient is quite complex, including its configuration."

"The tool needs to improve its documentation on license scripts."

"The solution is limited, but it needs lots of development, especially when we talk about making actions with other security solutions."

"The integration could be improved so that it is easy to integrate with other solutions."

"The initial setup is not straightforward or simple. It's quite complex."

"This product could be improved with better customization. However, some competitors' solutions contain more integration, support, automation, or flexibility."

More IBM Resilient cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is a license you need to pay for in order to use this product."

"Pricing for the solution is good, in my opinion."

"There are no costs except for the support services that our company pays in addition to the licensing charges attached to the solution."

"The licensing cost for IBM Resilient is not too expensive, but it's not affordable, so it's moderately expensive. Regarding price, I'm rating the solution seven out of ten. The company pays for the license yearly, based on the number of users. Apart from the cost of the license you need to pay for each user, you also need to spend an initial investment for the base platform. You also have to pay for IBM Resilient support."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a three out of ten. The tool’s pricing is on a yearly basis."

"It is very expensive."

"The cost of the product is quite high."

"We could create unlimited users using the license we had purchased."

More IBM Resilient pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Incident Response solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

30%

Government

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Resilient?

I am not the one in charge of pricing, so I am not sure about the costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Resilient?

Integration with some devices, including Cisco PowerPower and certain antivirus products, has limitations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Resilient?

The primary use case is automation.

See all answers

Comparisons

SECDO Platform vs Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL] Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk SOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 13% of the time

SECDO Platform vs IBM Resilient

Compared 6% of the time

DFLabs IncMan SOAR vs IBM Resilient

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs IBM Resilient

Compared 6% of the time

More IBM Resilient Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Security Incident Response

March 2026

Download Galvanize IncidentBond [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Resilient

April 2026

Download IBM Resilient product report

Also Known As

IncidentBond, Rsam SIRP, Rsam Incident Management, Rsam Security Incident Response Platform

No data available

Overview

Rsam’s Security Incident Response Platform (SIRP) simplifies and speeds monitoring and resolution. Our dynamic workflow can replicate any existing incident management process and allows you to make changes as your processes evolve - all from a single interface. Track the lifecycle of a security incident and coordinate actions quickly and with ease.

Diligent

The Resilient Incident Response Platform (IRP) is the leading platform for orchestrating and automating incident response processes.

The Resilient IRP quickly and easily integrates with your organization’s existing security and IT investments. It makes security alerts instantly actionable, provides valuable intelligence and incident context, and enables adaptive response to complex cyber threats.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Golden Living, Health Equity, USA Funds

Buyer's Guide

Security Incident Response

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, Trellix, Proofpoint and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.

We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.