Fujitsu vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800 comparison

Fujitsu and NetApp are both solutions in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category. Fujitsu is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.0, while NetApp is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. Fujitsu holds a 0.7% mindshare in N, compared to NetApp’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fujitsu users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 5, 2024

NetApp NVMe AFF A800 and Fujitsu compete in data storage technology. The A800 appears to have the upper hand in performance with high-speed processing, while Fujitsu excels in features like security and scalability.

Features: NetApp NVMe AFF A800 delivers high-speed data processing, advanced storage efficiencies, and is suitable for speed-focused environments. Fujitsu offers robust security features, extensive scalability options, and is appealing for businesses prioritizing data protection and growth adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp has streamlined deployment processes and proactive support, ensuring quick turnaround times and satisfaction. Fujitsu provides a comprehensive deployment model and responsive support, ideal for large-scale enterprises needing extensive initial guidance.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp NVMe AFF A800 reflects its advanced performance capabilities, often resulting in a faster ROI for performance-critical applications. Fujitsu presents a cost-effective setup with a steady ROI, appealing for businesses emphasizing initial investment control and long-term savings.

To learn more, read our detailed Fujitsu vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays category, the mindshare of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is 4.0%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is 2.1%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Pure FlashArray X NVMe	4.0%
NetApp NVMe AFF A800	2.1%
Fujitsu	0.7%
Other	93.2%

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

Featured Reviews

Jaehoon Oh

Chief Technology Officer at Lambda256

Supports efficient storage management through volume snapshots and offers reliable non-disruptive upgrades

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could be enhanced. I can see the performance statistics in the Pure Storage console, but it does not show the performance by 4K byte unit. It displays IOPS and bandwidth, but IOPS is about real use, and I want to know how many IOPS are currently running in 4K byte units. I cannot see that IOPS because most storage systems report their performance by 4K byte unit. I want to see Pure Storage performance by 4K byte unit to compare with other storage or other internal NVMe SSD.

Read full review

Alexander Kühn

Senior Project Manager Varna Information Technology / Owner at Varna Informationstechnology EOOD

Easy to use, but price is an area that needs to be improved

The question you have to ask yourself these days would be whether you need classical SAN storage or do you want to go with a modern approach like SaaS-based storage. If you want classical storage, Fujitsu is still a good product. If you want to be safer and work with off the shelf hardware,then go with NetApp. Don't pay the markup price charged by big storage vendors. My company has not faced any issues with the product's integration capabilities. The tool is basically used as a block device, so it's quite easy and simple at what it does. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Helder-Valente

IT Director at affidea

Has improved data efficiency and application performance while supporting encryption and fast access to imaging workloads

We use it quite extensively because with this we have more space and the information can be read without wasting time. We are satisfied with this. The performance is quite good. We don't have any issues regarding the applications that use fat clients. It helps prevent being hacked, and so far we don't have any issues. We can do the encryption of the data. The solution performs quite well. It helps us maintain our systems. Since we have many applications that use images for streaming, it works exceptionally well. We don't have any issues, and this helps us with the service we provide to the hospital.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"On a scale of one to ten, I rate Pure FlashArray as ten."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."

"It's incredibly easy to use and greatly simplified our ability to both deploy and manage our storage subsystems."

"It has good, reliable, fast storage."

"The most valuable features of Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its superior performance compared to other flash tiers, as well as its ease of use, with an intuitive user interface that is simple to deploy and use."

"Offers excellent features like efficient data reduction, a reliable SafeMode, and a great support model for continuous assistance and updates."

"Everything, especially the VMs inside, is pretty fast."

"The high availability of the product is the most valuable feature."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros

"It stands out for its affordability and the ability to provide unified storage."

"The solution's most valuable features stem from the DX series and the all-flash storage system."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a product that is fast and provides a fast I/O."

"We find the product to be very flexible."

"The storage features are valuable."

"The features I find most valuable in NetApp NVMe AFF A800 include the part of doing the tiering, NetApp NVMe AFF A800 has helped in enhancing my application performance, and in terms of metrics, I have observed that the latency with NetApp NVMe AFF A800 decreased significantly for us, with the response to read and write being faster, and we are satisfied with the applications."

"During the use cases of the solution, its reliability and suitability are the best."

"Over the eight years, we've been using NetApp with ONTAP, we've never lost a bit of data, and we've only experienced a few minutes of downtime in that entire time."

"NetApp NVMe AFF A800 is easier to use than some other solutions and the UI is very good to use for day-to-day activities. Overall, the solution has good technology."

"The most valuable features are stability and performance."

More NetApp NVMe AFF A800 pros

Cons

"It is on the expensive side."

"They could add more support for file storage and different types of storage."

"We would like to see more visibility into garbage collection and CPU performance in the GUI."

"One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them."

"Managing data isn't difficult for me. The performance is usually perfect, but we sometimes have capacity problems."

"We have run into a couple of instances recently where we are running out of space. So we have had to buy some more packs for it and they have deployed fine and it has increased smoothly."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing of the product."

"Every time I think of something that needs to improve, they're one step ahead, which I love. The only area I wish to see improve, I believe is coming, is in the FlashBlade product. Blade implementation fell short on a few of the services."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe cons

"The product's prices are an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The graphical interface is somewhat lacking, and it doesn't cover all the necessary tasks, often requiring users to resort to the command line for completion."

"The initial setup should be easier, and more like a plug-and-play approach."

"Stability is an area with a certain shortcoming where the solution needs to improve"

"Increasing the RAM, and including physical cords would be beneficial."

"The product's performance has some shortcomings, making it an area that could be a little better."

"The initial setup is complex."

"The support can take a few days to have a response. However, the response that we do receive is very informative."

"Sometimes, it takes a while to get somebody competent on the other end of the line. They do have engineers in multiple time zones around the world. However, their level-one support is not always the best."

"The cost of the solution is quite high. It would be ideal if they could adjust it so that it's a but less."

More NetApp NVMe AFF A800 cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Pure Storage, we would like to continue seeing price reductions with flash storage. I don't think we're any different than anybody else when we continue to look to the industry for price reductions of both NVMe and traditional SSD storage. We would like to see these prices continue to decline and erode, even displacing large spinning disks."

"Given its price, Pure is not the first option."

"The product is expensive."

"We pay approximately $50,000 USD per year in licensing fees."

"Its price could be better. It is not too expensive, but it is the high-end cost. It is kind of a Rolls-Royce. You pay a lot, but you get a lot out of it. So, the price pressure on the way down would be great, but at the end of the day, if you need to do the work, you just pay for it."

"Pretty much everything that you need is licensed when you buy the product. Licensing to me is different than the maintenance cost, but they can bleed into one another. We buy the product, and we expect three years of support bundled into what we negotiate on our storage arrays. I would start to see maintenance costs going into the fourth year, but we're not there yet."

"They can tout the functionality and cutting edge technology that they have, but that's where the price tag comes in. The cost is high, but I think as they grow their business and get more customers that it will probably go down a little bit."

"As far as the licensing costs, everything is included in the license."

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing and cost advice

"There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The entry-level midrange model from Fujitsu is cost-effective for our target market"

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten."

"Considering the requirements and the situation, I don't feel that this is an expensive product."

"Though NetApp NVMe AFF A800 may seem like a highly-priced product, it is not extremely expensive."

"There are licenses for the use of this solution, such as commercial licenses."

"The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

No data available

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

Pure FlashArray X NVMe helps to improve our processing speed. It is user-friendly and easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

The price of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is very expensive, though I do not know the actual price because I am using the E...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Pure FlashArray X NVMe?

I have no specific improvements to suggest for Pure FlashArray X NVMe at this time. The performance statistics could ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fujitsu?

There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fujitsu?

In terms of Fujitsu, the classical storage systems are going to be obsolete in my point of view. With SaaS storage to...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fujitsu?

I use the solution in my company to run the VM clusters with Fujitsu's database, as well as everything else we have i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp NVMe AFF A800?

The solution is affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp NVMe AFF A800?

For NVMe, the reporting and consolidation dashboard could be improved. The dashboard is not user-friendly. It should ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp NVMe AFF A800?

We continue with NetApp NVMe AFF A800. We are the client. It is used for storage and backup. Regarding equipment mode...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dell PowerStore vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 19% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 13% of the time

TrueNAS R-Series vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Alletra Storage vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 9% of the time

Pure Storage FlashBlade vs Pure FlashArray X NVMe

Compared 8% of the time

More Pure FlashArray X NVMe Competitors

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs Fujitsu

Compared 100% of the time

More Fujitsu Competitors

Dell PowerStore vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Compared 20% of the time

Huawei OceanStor Dorado vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Compared 12% of the time

Dell PowerMax vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Compared 9% of the time

NetApp ASA vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Compared 9% of the time

Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform vs NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Compared 8% of the time

More NetApp NVMe AFF A800 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Pure FlashArray X NVMe

December 2025

Download Pure FlashArray X NVMe product report

Buyer's Guide

NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays

December 2025

Download Fujitsu product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp NVMe AFF A800

December 2025

Download NetApp NVMe AFF A800 product report

Also Known As

Pure FlashArray//X NVMe, Pure FlashArray//X, FlashArray//X

No data available

Overview

Pure Storage FlashArray//X is the world’s first enterprise-class, all-NVMe flash storage array. It represents a new class of storage – shared accelerated storage, which is a term coined by Gartner – that delivers major breakthroughs in performance, simplicity, and consolidation.

Pure Storage

Fujitsu offers advanced technological solutions tailored to industry-specific demands. Recognized for robust performance and reliability, it facilitates a wide range of applications, providing users with flexibility and enhanced productivity across different sectors.

Fujitsu stands out as a leader in technology, integrating cutting-edge innovations that drive efficiency and elevate performance. Its offerings cover diverse areas, ensuring adaptability and seamless integration. Users benefit from its comprehensive approach, which combines state-of-the-art features with user-focused enhancements, addressing needs such as scalability and security.

What are the most important features of Fujitsu?

Scalability: Fujitsu allows for flexible scaling to address varying demands.
Security: Incorporates strong security protocols to protect data and systems.
Reliability: Known for dependable performance in demanding environments.
Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and integrates smoothly with existing setups.

What benefits or ROI can Fujitsu provide?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines processes to save time and resources.
Cost Reduction: Lowers operational costs through optimized resource use.
Enhanced Productivity: Facilitates uninterrupted workflows, boosting output.
Data Protection: Offers robust measures for safeguarding sensitive information.

Fujitsu finds applications in industries such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing, where its adaptability and security features are critical. In healthcare, its technology supports patient data management and operational efficiency. In finance, it ensures secure transactions, while in manufacturing, it enhances workflow processes and data analysis capabilities.

Fujitsu

Your data is a gold mine. Get the most out of it - faster - with AFF A800. Designed for NVMe media, further accelerated with NVMe/FC connectivity to the host, AFF A800 all-flash systems deliver an incredible sub-200 microsecond latency. Providing more than 11.4M IOPS and 300GB/s throughput in a single cluster, AFF A800 redefines the limit of what’s possible with artificial intelligence and deep learning.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Fremont Bank, Judson ISD, The Nielsen Company

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fujitsu vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800

December 2025

Free Report: Fujitsu vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800

Find out what your peers are saying about Fujitsu vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fujitsu vs. NetApp NVMe AFF A800 report.

See our list of best NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays vendors.

We monitor all NVMe All-Flash Storage Arrays reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.