Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Pure FlashArray X NVMe Logo

Pure FlashArray X NVMe pros and cons

Vendor: Pure Storage
4.6 out of 5
215 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Pure FlashArray X NVMe offers excellent stability and reliability, ensuring consistent performance.
It provides proactive support and monitoring services, where issues are often resolved before they impact users.
The initial setup of Pure FlashArray X NVMe is simple and straightforward, enhancing user experiences with minimal configuration efforts.
Pure FlashArray X NVMe achieves impressive data reduction rates, offering superior efficiency features like high compression and deduplication, particularly effective for Oracle databases.
It includes advanced features such as robust DDoS protection and seamless failover capabilities, promoting high availability and security.

CONS

Replication schemas could be improved, with better integration and communication needed.
Pure FlashArray X NVMe should implement active replication for VMware and improve efficiency.
More support for file storage, midrange storage needs, and multi-tenant capabilities is needed.
Pure FlashArray X NVMe pricing is higher than competitors, with concerns about the discontinuation of smaller boxes for the SMB market.
Data deduplication, garbage collection visibility, and file storage support need enhancements.
 

Pure FlashArray X NVMe Pros review quotes

HM
Oct 4, 2020
It is very easy to install and configure. It has got excellent diagnostics. If you really need to see how the box is performing, the console gives you a lot of information. You can set thresholds as well as alerts based on the thresholds, which is a very powerful functionality. They are very proactive. They know how to monitor and manage the systems. They see a problem, and they are all over it before us. They see the problem before we see it, which is very good.
JH
Sep 3, 2019
What I really like about this program, is that it is easy to use and easy to configurate.
JH
Sep 3, 2019
The duplication algorithm allows us to get a lot more use out of less storage. We're running a five terabyte array right now and we're running probably about 30 terabytes on it. So the duplication rate is pretty phenomenal, without a cost to performance. It still runs pretty smoothly.
Learn what your peers think about Pure FlashArray X NVMe. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2024.
812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SD
Nov 11, 2018
It's incredibly easy to use and greatly simplified our ability to both deploy and manage our storage subsystems.
RS
Nov 21, 2018
We're able to get higher-density workloads on the same infrastructure, and we have a smaller physical footprint. The performance is excellent – during our test the bottlenecks are never on the X array, it just keeps picking up the pace to match what you need. The real-time visibility is a differentiator in my opinion.
FS
Jan 19, 2022
The Pure1 component is most valuable at this point in time when comparing it with EMC. Pure1 is where you can have your diagnostics in the cloud, so you can look at things from your mobile phone.
Paul Pearson - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 25, 2022
The solution is very straightforward to set up.
Gokhan Dikmen - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 19, 2023
Pure Storage has signature security technology, which cannot be deleted, even if you are an administrator.
Eugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 10, 2024
The tool's valuable features are speed, security, data compression, and reliability. Its data compression feature is the best that we have ever seen. It helps us to save money and resources.
KS
Jan 18, 2023
The most valuable features of Pure FlashArray X NVMe are its superior performance compared to other flash tiers, as well as its ease of use, with an intuitive user interface that is simple to deploy and use.
 

Pure FlashArray X NVMe Cons review quotes

HM
Oct 4, 2020
Right now, the box itself is just strictly working as a backend storage system. It would be fantastic if we could access it directly like a NAS device through network access or SIS drives. I think they have an interface, but I am not sure how good it is. If we could address a box directly on the network without having to go through a server, it would be great. The replication schemas could be improved. We are not using replication on the storage level right now. We use a different type of replication. If their replication would be as good as the one that we have, I would probably run the replication schema because it might be faster, but I don't know that for a fact. So, I cannot say that they have good replication. All I can say is that they need to inform us better.
JH
Sep 3, 2019
Every time I think of something that needs to improve, they're one step ahead, which I love. The only area I wish to see improve, I believe is coming, is in the FlashBlade product. Blade implementation fell short on a few of the services.
SD
Nov 11, 2018
I want to see Pure Storage not only be for fast storage, but I want to see it be for the entire data center.
Learn what your peers think about Pure FlashArray X NVMe. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2024.
812,628 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RS
Nov 21, 2018
We've seen that when we create a POD in synchronous mode, it increases the latency.
FS
Jan 19, 2022
You cannot tag a LUN with a description, and that should be improved. What I like on the Unity side is that when I expand LUNs or do things, there is an information field on the LUN. This is the Information field that you can tag on your LUNs to let yourself know, "Hey, I've added this much space on this date". Pure lacks that ability. So, you don't have a mechanism that's friendly for tracking your data expansions on the LUN and for adding any additional information. That's a downside for me.
Paul Pearson - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 25, 2022
We would like to see more visibility into garbage collection and CPU performance in the GUI.
Gokhan Dikmen - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 19, 2023
If the customer only needs 500 terabytes and doesn't care how much data they'll put in the server, IBM is cheaper than Pure.
Eugene Hemphill - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 10, 2024
One point I'd like to improve is that the tool should start selling small boxes again. It discontinued some products and is focusing on bigger, more capable boxes, neglecting the SMB market. Even though it's not a big market, it shouldn't have removed them.
KS
Jan 18, 2023
Our use cases require more multi-tenant capabilities and additional VLAN interfaces for separating different customers. We currently use it to provide storage, sometimes shared storage, to different customers, but it is less flexible in comparison to a dedicated solution.
MS
Dec 12, 2023
We need better data deduplication.