Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud comparison

Fortra and Microsoft are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Fortra is ranked #58, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Fortra holds a 0.7% mindshare in VM, compared to Microsoft’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Read 6 Fortra Tripwire IP360 reviews

1,492 Views
1,149 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Read 90 Microsoft Defender for Cloud reviews

25,449 Views
6,362 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are both key players in cybersecurity solutions. Microsoft Defender for Cloud seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and seamless Azure integration.

Features: Fortra Tripwire IP360 provides efficient vulnerability management, insightful analytics, and host-based agent scanning for rapid and network-friendly assessments. Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in robust security monitoring, dynamic networking support, and Azure integration, enhancing its usability for businesses using Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Fortra Tripwire IP360 could enhance its capabilities by expanding beyond IP range management and integrating with other cloud services. It would also benefit from enhancing its automation features. Microsoft Defender for Cloud could improve by offering more flexibility for non-Azure environments, refining its UI for better user experience, and providing more explicit prevention tools against data sharing with AI applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra Tripwire IP360 features a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service. Microsoft Defender for Cloud's deployment benefits Azure users through its cloud-native approach, although users from non-Azure environments may face adaptation challenges. However, its integration within the Azure ecosystem often proves advantageous for existing Microsoft service users.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra Tripwire IP360 generally has lower upfront setup costs, making it appealing for budget-conscious businesses. Microsoft Defender for Cloud justifies its higher price with extensive features and better long-term ROI, driven by its additional security layers and seamless Microsoft tool integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra Tripwire IP360

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

58th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Ranking in Vulnerability Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (6th), Container Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (5th), Microsoft Security Suite (7th), Compliance Management (4th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Fortra Tripwire IP360 is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Defender for Cloud is 3.1%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Defender for Cloud	3.1%
Fortra Tripwire IP360	0.7%
Other	96.2%

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Corey Cole

Service Coordinator - Technology Security at a government with 10,001+ employees

The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain

Only the administrator was using the product. He used it to read reports as part of our compliance programs. It wasn't heavily used by a lot of users. The tool comes in at a large scale, and we tried to scale it down. The scaling did not apply to us. It was neither difficult nor easy. I rate the scalability a five out of ten. We had some challenges while scaling it down. It could do 10,000 devices, and we wanted to use it for ten devices. The process was difficult and expensive. We did not need the product anymore.

Read full review

Archana-Singh

Manager at Softcell Technologies Limited

Improved multi-cloud security posture and compliance reporting but still need better alert tuning

The multi-cloud support in Microsoft Defender for Cloud is good, but the Azure integrations are much deeper than AWS or GCP, so feature consistency could improve. Alert noise and recommendation prioritization can become overwhelming in large environments without significant tuning. I would also prefer better custom reporting, dashboard flexibility, and simpler policy exceptions management for enterprise-scale operations. The portal experience in Microsoft Defender for Cloud can feel fragmented because some investigations move between Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Defender XDR, Azure Policy, and Sentinel. Integration with DevOps or security pipelines is good, but onboarding and tuning Kubernetes or container security still requires strong expert expertise. I would also prefer more intuitive recommendation and remediation guidance and clear workflows for large multi-subscription environments.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed."

"Tripwire is one of the most mature in terms of companies, suites, support, everything, much more than any other product."

"Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

"We could manage our entire IP range with the solution."

"Tripwire IP360 helps me to discover most of the vulnerabilities, and I like the way that it prioritizes these vulnerabilities, as it allows me to focus on the most important ones first and then follow up with the rest."

"The company probably chose this solution because they thought that they would be getting the best bang for their buck."

"This product detects vulnerabilities which exist in the environment, and provides enough information that allows for remediation, thereby securing the environment."

"It has enhanced the security program by ensuring that all external-facing systems are scanned on a routine basis."

"It improves the transparency and visibility of the traffic in and out of the network of each workload on my system."

"Microsoft Defender for Cloud can find potential phishing links and malicious code in data at rest."

"The most valuable feature is the comprehensive overview across different workloads. It allows us to see protection not just across one workload, such as virtual machines, containers, infrastructure, or data, but across all our workloads. This overall visibility is really helpful."

"It has seamless integration with any of the services I mentioned, on Azure, such as IaaS platforms, virtual machines, applications, or databases, because it's an in-house product from Microsoft within the Azure ecosystem."

"No doubt it is useful as per the log analysis and threat protection analysis."

"The solution is quite good and addresses many security gaps."

"Right after I joined the company, that was one of the first things that I advised them to do and a couple of weeks later, we caught at least two big vulnerabilities that could have caused a catastrophic problem for our business."

"The solution is very easy to deploy."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pros

Cons

"We would like to have better reporting capabilities and for them to be more granular."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running."

"The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

"I am not very impressed by the technical support."

"If you are looking for better reporting capabilities and vulnerability tracking over time for remediation purposes, then this is not the best solution."

"The reporting functions can use improvement."

"For IP360, unfortunately, scans for certain vulnerabilities often cause issues, as they are mainly false positive."

"Pricing could be improved. There are limited options based on pricing for the government."

"As a micro-segmentation product, it's not so great, especially if you have a lot of systems."

"Consistency is the area where the most improvement is needed. For example, there are some areas where the UI is not uniform across the board."

"From my own perspective, they just need a product that is tailored to micro-segmentation so I can configure rules for multiple systems at once and manage it."

"I would like to have the ability to customize executive reporting."

"They could always work to make the pricing a bit lower."

"The most significant areas for improvement are in the security of our identity and endpoints and the posture of the cloud environment. Better protection for our cloud users and cloud apps is always welcome."

"Microsoft Graph needs improvement."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product was expensive for us."

"I believe the price compares well within the market."

"There is a helpful cost-reducing option that allows you to integrate production subscriptions with non-production subscriptions."

"I am not involved in this area. However, I believe its price is okay because even small customers are using Azure Security Center. I don't think it is very expensive."

"Pricing depends on your workload size, but it is very cheap. If you're talking about virtual machines, it is $5 or something for each machine, which is minimal. If you go for some agent-based solution for every virtual machine, then you need to pay the same thing or more than that. For an on-premises solution like this, we were paying around $30 to $50 based on size. With Defender, Microsoft doesn't bother about the size. You pay based on the number of machines. So, if you have 10 virtual machines, and 10 virtual machines are being monitored, you are paying based on that rather than the size of the virtual machine. Thus, you are paying for the number of units rather than paying for the size of your units."

"The cost of the license is based on the subscriptions that you have."

"Our clients complain about the cost of Microsoft Defender for Cloud."

"There are improvements that have to be made to the licensing. Currently, for servers, it has to be done by grouping the servers on a single subscription... We don't have an option whereby, if all those resources are in one subscription, we can have each of the individual servers subject to different planning."

"There are two different plans. We're using the secure basic plan, but we have used the end security plan as well. There are additional costs, but it gives us more functionalities compared to the basic plan."

"The licensing cost per server is $15 per month."

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How is Prisma Cloud vs Azure Security Center for security?

Azure Security Center is very easy to use, integrates well, and gives very good visibility on what is happening across your ecosystem. It also has great remote workforce capabilities and supports a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was that the license cost was the only consideration. Setup and support had no issues.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

To improve Microsoft Defender for Cloud, I think pricing-wise, the license price is a little bit higher from an ingestion cost perspective. Depending on what license you choose, you might have to p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 11% of the time

Tenable Security Center vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Fortra Tripwire IP360

Compared 5% of the time

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Competitors

AWS GuardDuty vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 30% of the time

Wiz vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Cloud Security vs Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360

May 2026

Download Fortra Tripwire IP360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender for Cloud

April 2026

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud product report

Also Known As

IP360

Microsoft Azure Security Center, Azure Security Center, Microsoft ASC, Azure Defender

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Fortra

Microsoft

Overview

Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks.

Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

Fortra

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security platform offering integration with Microsoft services, multi-cloud capability, AI-driven threat detection, compliance, and unified visibility for improved security operations.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud manages security operations by integrating with Microsoft services and supporting multi-cloud environments. Its features include AI-driven threat detection, compliance oversight, and advanced threat protection. It simplifies processes with unified visibility, threat intelligence, and automated workflows, enhancing security posture across various workloads. Despite its robust capabilities, improvements are needed in third-party tool integration, comprehensive AI-driven remediation, and a more intuitive dashboard. Users report complexity in licensing, inadequate documentation, and high costs, with room for enhancements in compliance reporting and multi-cloud support.

What are the key features of Microsoft Defender for Cloud?

Integration with Microsoft Services: Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft platforms for streamlined operations.
Multi-Cloud Capability: Supports various cloud environments for broader coverage.
AI-Driven Threat Detection: Uses AI to identify and counter security threats effectively.
Compliance Features: Offers regulatory compliance tools to ensure adherence to standards.
Unified Visibility: Provides a comprehensive view of security operations for better management.
Endpoint Management: Manages and secures endpoint devices efficiently.
Advanced Threat Protection: Delivers enhanced defense against complex threats.
Vulnerability Management: Identifies and addresses vulnerabilities proactively.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens security across multiple environments.
Unified Threat Intelligence: Centralizes threat data for informed decision-making.
Automated Processes: Streamlines security operations with automated workflows.
Prioritized Remediation: Offers prioritized actions to address security challenges efficiently.

Industries leverage Microsoft Defender for Cloud for security posture management and endpoint protection. Many companies integrate it with Office 365 for enhanced functionality. It provides comprehensive security overviews by monitoring cloud vulnerabilities, limiting unauthorized access, and replacing existing tools with its extensive capabilities from network security to compliance checks, securing Azure infrastructure, and enhancing client security.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is trusted by companies such as ASOS, Vatenfall, SWC Technology Partners, and more.

Buyer's Guide

Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.