We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and SecureLink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The integration of VPN services with endpoint security is valuable."
"It's pretty stable, and I don't have any problems with it."
"Compared to other similar solutions, it is faster in connecting."
"FortiClient has good signatures, good protection and, up until recently, it integrated really well with our firewall."
"It's got a very friendly user interface."
"What I like most about FortiClient is that it's easy to use. The way it displays information is very straightforward."
"It seems to be more scalable than we thought."
"The technical support from Fortinet and local vendors is good."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The initial setup was probably more complex. The configuration was somewhat unclear."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"I have yet to find the benefits of the latest upgraded version."
"The software inventory part is not yet up-to-date. It doesn't have a great interface, which is a disadvantage. I wish we could leverage it, but we don't use it at all because it's not that reliable."
"With Fortinet, some clients have to wait two to four days for a response. That is the biggest complaint from end customer about Fortinet's technical support."
"Initially, the support was very poor. It is getting better, but they should continue to improve this."
"One area for improvement in FortiClient is the speed of connectivity."
"I would like to see an improvement in the web filter, because I think it can be more user-friendly."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews while SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while SecureLink is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.