We performed a comparison between Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and SecureLink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The features I find most valuable is WildFire, user integration, and the basic technology features."
"Security is absolutely spot-on, really top-notch. It's the result of all the components that come together, such as the HIP [Host Information Profile] and components like Forcepoint, providing end-user content inspection, and antivirus. It incorporates DLP features and that's fantastic because Prisma Access makes sure that all of the essential prerequisites are in place before a user can log in or can be tunneled into."
"It is easy to use, easy to integrate, and is stable. It's scalable as well."
"It's great that we can make sure a machine meets the minimum requirements before users are allowed to log in."
"Prisma Access gives us security from a single point. It controls mobile users and determines how secure their networks will be, including from where they will get internet access. We can optimize things and add security profiles centrally."
"Panorama provides centralized management capabilities for all our firewalls and locations so that we can manage different data centers through a single device, a very valuable feature. We don't have to log into various devices to oversee them individually."
"Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is a seamless solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to join your network and provide access through the VPN."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Sometimes, we encountered a portal crash. When we told Palo Alto they said it might be the browser or cache, but I think they need to improve it on their side."
"Better integration with the MDM solution would be useful."
"We would like to see improvements in the licensing; currently, Palo Alto provides 500 to 1000 licenses for users, and we want to see 1500 to 2000 licenses for one version."
"There is some particular traffic that the security team wants to filter out and apply their own policies and they cannot."
"The licensing model isn't flexible enough. It's an all-or-nothing model. Other providers in the market allow you to buy modules or add-ons separately. With Prisma Access, you have to purchase the same module for all users."
"The product's current price is an area of shortcoming where improvements are required."
"It wasn't so satisfying to work with it. There is room for improvement in the policy management. It is difficult to cover the entire scenery through Palo Alto products."
"The cloud setup is straightforward, and the onboarding process is much better, but the on-premises initial setup is slightly complex."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 5th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 57 reviews while SecureLink is ranked 39th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.2, while SecureLink is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks writes "Integration with Palo Alto platforms such as Cortex Data Lake and Autofocus gives us visibility into our attack surface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Netskope , Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access and Prisma SD-WAN, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
