Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortify Software Security Center vs Klocwork comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while Perforce is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4. OpenText holds a 0.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to Perforce’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Perforce users who would recommend it.
Fortify Software Security C...
Read 6 Fortify Software Security Center reviews
  • 437 Views
  • 319 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Klocwork
Read 23 Klocwork reviews
  • 3,397 Views
  • 2,037 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify Software Security Center and Klocwork are prominent competitors in the software security analysis tools category. Klocwork has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior user satisfaction in flexibility and deployment, despite Fortify being praised for cost-effective pricing.

Features: Fortify Software Security Center is known for robust integration capabilities, accurate vulnerability identification, and efficient deployment. Klocwork is preferred for superior coding rule customization, extensive language support, and flexible feature sets tailored to diverse development environments.

Room for Improvement: Fortify needs to improve scan speed, simplify configuration, and advance its interface. Klocwork should work on a more intuitive dashboard, enhanced scanning performance, and interface usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify offers streamlined deployment and thorough documentation but receives mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Klocwork delivers efficient deployment and responsive customer support, giving it an edge in user satisfaction related to deployment models and service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify is recognized for cost-effective pricing and satisfactory ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Klocwork's higher initial setup costs are justified by its robust features and long-term ROI benefits, attracting users prioritizing functionality over initial expense.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
26th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Klocwork
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (16th), Static Code Analysis (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.6%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive vulnerability analysis and customization features with decent pricing
Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances. WebInspect supports a number of APIs and web endpoints. I find its feature of macro recording allows for testing vulnerabilities during multi-factor authentication sessions very valuable. I appreciate the ability to further analyze data with tools like Audit Workbench.
Read full review
AnirbanSarkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws
What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."
"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."
"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."
"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."
"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."
"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."
"There's a feature in Klocwork called 'on-the-fly analysis', which helps developers to find and fix the defects at the time of development itself."
"The reporting helps us understand the trend of our results and whether we improve over time. We can see the history within Klocwork's server architecture and know that we're making things better. It creates a great story for our management. We can demonstrate value and how our software is developing over time."
"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is finding defects while you're doing the coding. For example, if you have an IDE plug-in of Klocwork on Visual Studio or Eclipse, you can find the faults; similar to using spell check on Word, you can find out defects during the development phase, which means that you don't have to wait till the development is over to find the flaws and address the deficiencies. I also find language support in Klocwork good because it used to support only C, C++, C#, and Java, but now, it also supports Java scripts and Python."
"The most valuable feature is the Incremental analysis."
"On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively."
"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."
"Technical support is quite good."
"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is its reduced setup time."
More Klocwork pros
 

Cons

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."
"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."
"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."
"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."
"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."
"There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them."
"What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity."
"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."
"Klocwork does have a problem with true positives. It only found 30% of true positives in the Juliet test case."
"Klocwork has to improve its features to stay ahead of other free solutions."
More Klocwork cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is priced fair."
"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."
"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."
"This solution offers competitive pricing."
"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."
"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."
"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."
"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."
"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."
"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
5%
Educational Organization
32%
Manufacturing Company
21%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?
You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
In the beginning, it was difficult for me to verify that our usage of Fortify Software Security Center corresponded to the license and criteria. Now, we have negotiated a number of details to respe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?
I would like the false positive issue to diminish. I have experienced a lot of false positives, but I think this is due to using an older version. I hope the new version will resolve my problem.
See all answers
What do you like most about Klocwork?
It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Klocwork?
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits. Currently, this feature is absent, but we have suggested it to the team.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Fortify on Demand vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 57% of the time
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 43% of the time
More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork
Compared 36% of the time
Coverity vs Klocwork Logo
Coverity vs Klocwork
Compared 30% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork
Compared 13% of the time
Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork Logo
Parasoft SOAtest vs Klocwork
Compared 3% of the time
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Klocwork Logo
Fortify Static Code Analyzer vs Klocwork
Compared 3% of the time
More Klocwork Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
April 2025
Fortify Software Security Center reportDownload Fortify Software Security Center product report
Buyer's Guide
Klocwork
April 2025
Klocwork reportDownload Klocwork product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
No data available
 

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
OpenText

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce
 

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL
Buyer's Guide
Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork
April 2025
Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.