Fortify Software Security Center vs Klocwork comparison

OpenText and Perforce are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 9.0, while Perforce is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in SAST, compared to Perforce’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Perforce users who would recommend it.

Fortify Software Security C...

Read 8 Fortify Software Security Center reviews

890 Views
828 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Read 25 Klocwork reviews

3,478 Views
2,330 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Fortify Software Security C...

Klocwork

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Fortify Software Security Center and Klocwork are prominent competitors in the software security analysis tools category. Klocwork has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior user satisfaction in flexibility and deployment, despite Fortify being praised for cost-effective pricing.

Features: Fortify Software Security Center is known for robust integration capabilities, accurate vulnerability identification, and efficient deployment. Klocwork is preferred for superior coding rule customization, extensive language support, and flexible feature sets tailored to diverse development environments.

Room for Improvement: Fortify needs to improve scan speed, simplify configuration, and advance its interface. Klocwork should work on a more intuitive dashboard, enhanced scanning performance, and interface usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify offers streamlined deployment and thorough documentation but receives mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness. Klocwork delivers efficient deployment and responsive customer support, giving it an edge in user satisfaction related to deployment models and service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify is recognized for cost-effective pricing and satisfactory ROI, making it appealing to budget-conscious organizations. Klocwork's higher initial setup costs are justified by its robust features and long-term ROI benefits, attracting users prioritizing functionality over initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

21st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Klocwork

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (17th), Static Code Analysis (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Klocwork is 1.4%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Klocwork	1.4%
Fortify Software Security Center	0.9%
Other	97.7%

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Diego Caicedo Lescano

Chief Innovation Officer at SAGGA

Enables centralized analysis and improves governance through seamless tool integration

The main use case for Fortify Software Security Center is exceptional because we have governance and control through that console. You can centralize both static analysis and dynamic analysis, and correlate both analyses in one tool to get better results by combining those independent results from each solution. That is outstanding, and there is no tool I have seen on the market that offers these capabilities. I appreciate the interoperability with other solutions from Fortify Software Security Center. Because we are using Kiuwan, you can run Kiuwan analyses and integrate them with Fortify Software Security Center to get those results in a single console. That is a good console for centralizing things in one point. That is one of the best features of the on-premises Fortify.

Read full review

Krishna M Gopalakrishnan

Manager, Quality, Functional Safety, Cybersecurity Embedded Processing at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Experience with compliance improvements and efficiency boosts but static analysis engine shows a need for enhancement

One area for improvement is that when customers use different static analysis tools, they report more issues compared to Klocwork. The static analysis engine of Klocwork has areas that need improvement. Customers using different static analysis tools report more issues than with Klocwork, indicating that Klocwork's engine is not as superior. Klocwork should be able to analyze large codebases efficiently, supporting a desktop version for periodic small delta changes before pushing to the server.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."

"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."

"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."

"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."

"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."

"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."

"It's very important because they want to scan their source code every day, so we provide CICD integration to our customers so they can auto build and auto test every day, get reports, and fix issues."

"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."

More Fortify Software Security Center pros

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

"There's a feature in Klocwork called 'on-the-fly analysis', which helps developers to find and fix the defects at the time of development itself."

"The most valuable feature is the Incremental analysis."

"I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not."

"On-the-fly analysis and incremental analysis are the best parts of Klocwork. Currently, we are using both of these features very effectively."

"It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration."

"Technical support is quite good."

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

More Klocwork pros

Cons

"The support for Fortify on-premises is the same as for the other products. I would say the support is not good and I would rate it a three out of ten."

"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."

"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."

"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."

"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."

"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."

"This solution could be improved if they offered support of more languages including Ada and Golang. They currently only support seven languages."

"Under NIST cybersecurity standards, we must address vulnerabilities within a specified time after discovering them. When we try to propagate those updates and fixes through the system, it would be nice if the clients could reconnect to the existing server or have the server dynamically updated in some way. I know that isn't easy, but maybe processes could be enhanced to make that more streamlined from a DevOps perspective."

"We bought Klocwork, but it was limited to one little program, but the program is now sort of failing. So, we have a license for usage on a program that is sort of failing, and we really can't use the license on anything else."

"There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them."

"Even though it does the job, there's room for feature enhancements, such as integrations with Git for better tracking and notifications."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"Klocwork does have a problem with true positives. It only found 30% of true positives in the Juliet test case."

"Customers using different static analysis tools report more issues than with Klocwork, indicating that Klocwork's engine is not as superior."

More Klocwork cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."

"The solution is priced fair."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

23%

Computer Software Company

10%

Transportation Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	12

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

The pricing for the on-premises Fortify is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?

In my opinion, there are no areas that could be improved with Fortify Software Security Center. I would say it is a good product and a mature product. However, the SAST has many improvement areas. ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Software Security Center?

We have installed Fortify Static Code Analysis, SAST, in Ecuador in two customers. The Fortify ScanCentral includes three components: SAST, Fortify Software Security Center, and the WebInspect.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Klocwork?

I work on tools such as Klocwork, LDRA, as well as Jira and Confluence, focusing more on the software quality assurance aspect. We use Klocwork for coding and aggregate checks. We use it for static...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 25% of the time

Checkmarx IaC Security / KICS vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

SonarQube vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 8% of the time

Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors

Coverity Static vs Klocwork

Compared 24% of the time

SonarQube vs Klocwork

Compared 21% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 10% of the time

Helix QAC vs Klocwork

Compared 8% of the time

Axivion Static Code Analysis vs Klocwork

Compared 5% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

January 2026

Download Fortify Software Security Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

January 2026

Download Klocwork product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect

No data available

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.

OpenText

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Buyer's Guide

Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork

December 2025

Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. Klocwork report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.