Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Fortify Software Security Center vs OpenText Core Application Security comparison

Fortify Software Security Center and OpenText Core Application Security are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Fortify Software Security Center is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText Core Application Security is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0. Fortify Software Security Center holds a 0.4% mindshare in SAST, compared to OpenText Core Application Security’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortify Software Security Center users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of OpenText Core Application Security users who would recommend it.
Fortify Software Security C...
Read 7 Fortify Software Security Center reviews
  • 576 Views
  • 513 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Core Application S...
Read 60 OpenText Core Application Security reviews
  • 7,668 Views
  • 5,981 Comparison Views
89% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

Fortify Software Security Center and OpenText Core Application Security compete in the application security segment. Fortify holds the edge in deployment and customer service, while OpenText excels in features with a compelling ROI.

Features: Fortify Software Security Center offers comprehensive static and dynamic analysis, seamless integration, and source-code scanning. OpenText Core Application Security provides an extensive library of security checks, advanced threat intelligence, and macro recording for better vulnerability testing.

Room for Improvement: Fortify could enhance its feature range and reduce complexity in deployment. More customization and scalability options may also be beneficial. OpenText can improve ease of use, lower its learning curve, and enhance its customer support consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify stands out for its straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service, ensuring smooth integration. OpenText, however, presents a steeper learning curve and variable customer support experiences.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify offers competitive pricing with justifiable returns. OpenText, while generally more expensive, delivers a strong ROI through its feature-rich solutions that offer significant long-term value.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Fortify Software Security Center vs. OpenText Core Application Security Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Fortify Software Security Center vs. OpenText Core Application Security
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortify Software Security C...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
28th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
5.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Core Application S...
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Fortify Software Security Center is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.9%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive vulnerability analysis and customization features with decent pricing
Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances. WebInspect supports a number of APIs and web endpoints. I find its feature of macro recording allows for testing vulnerabilities during multi-factor authentication sessions very valuable. I appreciate the ability to further analyze data with tools like Audit Workbench.
Read full review
Jonathan Steyn - PeerSpot reviewer
Source code analyzer, FPR file generation, reduction of false positives and generates compliance reports, for in-depth analysis
Not challenges with the product itself. The product is very reliable. It does have a steep learning curve. But, again, one thing that Fortify or OpenText does very well is training. There are a lot of free resources and training in the community forums, free training as well as commercial training where users can train on how to use the back-end systems and the scanning engines and how to use command-line arguments because some of the procedures or some of the tools do require a bit of a learning curve. That's the only challenge I've really seen for customers because you have to learn how to use the tool effectively. But Fortify has, in fact, improved its user interface and the way users engage the dashboards and the interfaces. It is intuitive. It's easy to understand. But in some regards, the cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions. But from the point of the reliability index and how powerful the tool is, there's no challenge there. But it's just from a learning perspective; users might need a bit more skill to use the tool. The user interface isn't that tedious. It's not that difficult to understand. When I initially learned how to use the interfaces, I was able to master it within a week and was able to use it quite effectively. So training is required. All skills are needed to learn how to use the tool. I would like to see more enhancements in the dashboards. Dashboards are available. They do need some configuration and settings. But I would like to see more business intelligence capabilities within the tool. It's not particularly a cybersecurity function, but, for instance, business impact analysis or other features where you can actually use business intelligence capabilities within your security tool. That would be remarkable because not only do you have a cybersecurity tool, but you also have a tool that can give you business impact analysis and some other measurements. A bit more intelligence in terms of that from a cybersecurity perspective would be remarkable.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Software Security Center is highly customizable and helps me test all vulnerability data against the latest conventions like OWASP Top Ten, CVE Top twenty-five, and several other legal compliances."
"Fortify Analytics' AI function helps scan and provides more detailed explanations and recommendations about vulnerabilities."
"I like the explanation of issues provided by Fortify Software Security Center."
"This is a stable solution at the end of the day."
"The overall rating for this tool is ten out of ten."
"You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them."
"The reporting is very useful because you can always view an entire list of the issues that you have."
"We identified a lot of security vulnerability much earlier in the development and could fix this well before the product was rolled out to a huge number of clients."
"Audit workbench: for on-the-fly defect auditing."
"The licensing was good."
"It is an extremely robust, scalable, and stable solution."
"Fortify on Demand's best feature is that there's no need to install and configure it locally since it's on the cloud."
"The most valuable features of Micro Focus Fortify on Demand have been SAT analysis and application security."
"The features that I have found most valuable include its security scan, the vulnerability finds, and the web interface to search and review the issues."
"The solution is user-friendly."
More OpenText Core Application Security pros
 

Cons

"We are having issues with false positives that need to be resolved."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"Improvements needed for Software Security Center include better aggregation views of datasets."
"I am not satisfied with the percentage of false positives, which is around eighteen percent."
"Fortify Software Security Center's setup is really painful."
"This solution is difficult to implement, and it should be made more comfortable for the end-users."
"The product's overlap feature is restrictive and requires more customization efforts, which can be expensive."
"There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify. One day it may pass a scan with no issues, and the next day, without any code changes, it will report vulnerabilities such as password exposure."
"We have some stability issues, but they are minimal."
"In terms of what could be improved, we need more strategic analysis reports, not just for one specific application, but for the whole enterprise. In the next release, we need more reports and more analytic views for all the applications. There is no enterprise view in Fortify. I would like enterprise views and reports."
"With Rapid7 I utilized its reporting capabilities to deliver Client Reports within just a few minutes of checking the data. I believe that HP’s FoD Clients could sell more services to clients if HP put more effort into delivering visually pleasing reporting capabilities."
"The Visual Studio plugin seems to hang when a scan is run on big projects. I would expect some improvements there."
"The UI could be better. Fortify should also suggest new packages in the product that can be upgraded. Currently, it shows that, but it's not visible enough. In future versions, I would like more insights about the types of vulnerabilities and the pages associated with the exact CVE."
"They have very good support, but there is always room for improvement."
"There's a bit of a learning curve. Our development team is struggling with following the rules and following the new processes."
More OpenText Core Application Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a costly solution that could be cheaper."
"The solution is priced fair."
"As a Fortify partner company providing technical support, I find the product expensive in our country, where local, inexpensive products are available."
"We make an annual purchase of the licenses we need."
"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."
"The product's cost depends on the type of license."
"The solution is a little expensive."
"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."
"It is quite expensive. Pricing and the licensing model could be improved."
"Fortify on Demand is more expensive than Burpsuite. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."
"It is cost-effective."
More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Software Security Center?
You can easily download the tool's rule packs and update them.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Software Security Center?
In the beginning, it was difficult for me to verify that our usage of Fortify Software Security Center corresponded to the license and criteria. Now, we have negotiated a number of details to respe...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Software Security Center?
I would like the false positive issue to diminish. I have experienced a lot of false positives, but I think this is due to using an older version. I hope the new version will resolve my problem.
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?
It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?
In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?
There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify. One day it may pass a scan with no issues, and the next day, without any code changes, it will report vulnerabilities such as passw...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center Logo
Acunetix vs Fortify Software Security Center
Compared 44% of the time
More Fortify Software Security Center Competitors
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 16% of the time
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 12% of the time
Coverity vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
Coverity vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 10% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 10% of the time
DerScanner vs OpenText Core Application Security Logo
DerScanner vs OpenText Core Application Security
Compared 2% of the time
More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
July 2025
Fortify Software Security Center reportDownload Fortify Software Security Center product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Core Application Security
July 2025
OpenText Core Application Security reportDownload OpenText Core Application Security product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Software Security Center, Application Security Center, HPE Application Security Center, WebInspect
Micro Focus Fortify on Demand
 

Overview

Software Security Center enables management, development, and security teams to work together to triage, track, validate, automate, and manage software security activities.
OpenText

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?
  • Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
  • Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
  • Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
  • Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
  • API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.
What benefits should users look for in reviews?
  • Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
  • Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
  • Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
  • Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Neosecure, Acxiom, Skandinavisk Data Center A/S, Parkeon
SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.
Buyer's Guide
Fortify Software Security Center vs. OpenText Core Application Security
July 2025
Free Report: Fortify Software Security Center vs. OpenText Core Application Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortify Software Security Center vs. OpenText Core Application Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Fortify Software Security Center vs. OpenText Core Application Security report.
See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.