Flowmon vs NetWitness NDR comparison

Progress Software and NetWitness are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. Progress Software is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while NetWitness is ranked #20. Progress Software holds a 1.8% mindshare in NDaR, compared to NetWitness’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

Flowmon

Read 4 Flowmon reviews

460 Views
368 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetWitness NDR

Read 15 NetWitness NDR reviews

589 Views
458 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Flowmon

NetWitness NDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

NetWitness NDR and Flowmon are network detection and response solutions. Flowmon has an advantage in features, making it a valuable investment, while NetWitness NDR is noted for its pricing and support.

Features: NetWitness NDR includes advanced threat detection, behavior analytics, and incident response. Flowmon offers network traffic analysis, clear insights, and intuitive management. Its comprehensive visibility and customizable modules are recognized for depth and adaptability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness NDR features a straightforward deployment and solid customer service. Flowmon offers a simplified installation process with accessible customer support, enhancing user satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR provides competitive pricing with reasonable ROI, balancing cost with functionality. Flowmon entails a higher initial cost but offers substantial long-term ROI through extensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Flowmon vs. NetWitness NDR Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. NetWitness NDR

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Flowmon

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (41st)

NetWitness NDR

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (59th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (35th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (63rd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (24th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of Flowmon is 1.8%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetWitness NDR is 2.1%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

Pifu Lin

Senior System Engineer at DYNASAFE TECHNOLOGIES PTE. LTD.

Quick identification of network issues enhances performance monitoring

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly. We need this solution to monitor the network performance. We started using it three…

Read full review

SupravatMaji

Associate Vice President - IT Security at Inspira Enterprise

Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability

My advice to those wanting to implement RSA NetWitness Network is they have to first do a little due diligence, such as the exact requirement based on their needs. That will give them a direction for their investment because otherwise, the bill of material or bill of quantity (BOQ) may be higher side. It is important to do good due intelligence on the environment, see the exact requirement, and then go ahead with the solution. The solution is perfectly stable. I rate RSA NetWitness Network a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Flowmon is more easy to understand and helps find network issues more quickly."

"The artificial intelligence and automatic detection system in Flowmon Solution are perfect for every, type of customer, such as government and commerce."

"It is an open platform, so in terms of integration, we are quite happy. We can integrate it with other SNMP solutions. We can also integrate it with security solutions, such as a SIEM solution."

"The solution is stable."

"NetWitness Endpoint's most valuable features are its interoperability across many different operating systems and the ease of pivoting from network to endpoint via a single console."

"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."

"They have recently updated the features and the most valuable ones are the instant threat response, ease of use, web interface, integration, and easy access. RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very compatible with other solutions and technologies. However, they do not rely on third-party solutions and have most features built-in."

"It is very easy to use, and its usability is great. The use cases are also very easy. The visualizations of the use cases are magnificent. You cannot find this in any other solution. From my point of view, it is great."

"This solution allows us to locate the malware in real-time."

"The most valuable feature of RSA NetWitness Network is the single unified dashboard from which you can manage all the different products of RSA. Additionally, the integration with native applications is good."

"The stability of the RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very good."

"The most valuable feature is the way it captures the traffic, and it contains every detail of the communication."

More NetWitness NDR pros

Cons

"I do not know the detailed pricing."

"If there was better visualization in Flowmon Solution it would be good."

"It would be helpful to have more details about the monitoring of the infrastructure. It should have support for SNMP. This is something that is currently not there in the product."

"The licensing price could be better."

"RSA NetWitness Network could improve on integration with non-native application integration."

"NetWitness Endpoint's blocking feature does not work properly - if there's a malicious process, it's not possible to kill it via a custom rule unless and until it's flagged as malicious."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

"The initial setup requires a high level of skill."

"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."

"The solution is modular, for example you can buy the RSA ePack, which you buy as a module is not part of the conduit solution. They could include it and have it as an all-in-one solution."

"We would like to see the hunting and investigation features of this solution improved, in order to provide better visibility of issues."

"The integration of the solution needs to be improved. The dashboard needs lots of updates as well. In the next release, we would like to see advanced fraud detection features."

More NetWitness NDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It works with a permanent license, and then you can pay for the support. For the gold support, you need to pay yearly."

"The licensing fee accrues only once, but that of support is annual."

"The price of the solution could be better."

"NetWitness Endpoint is less costly than its competitors, but it offers fewer features."

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

"It is an expensive product."

"It is highly scalable. It can be bought based on your requirements."

"The pricing is not very economical. It is a quite costly product for India. One thing is that when you purchase it, you have to purchase a module separately."

"They can easily adjust if you have the requirements which are required. If you have a budget cut or a budget constraint, they can bend."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I don't understand the price. I am in deployment, so I do not know the detailed pricing.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

We will try to Proof of Concept (POC) to a client in Taiwan. We just use the features for the Network Performance Monitor (NPM).

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Flowmon Anomaly Detection System?

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Darktrace vs Flowmon

Compared 20% of the time

Vectra AI vs Flowmon

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Flowmon

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Flowmon

Compared 7% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Flowmon

Compared 7% of the time

More Flowmon Competitors

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 14% of the time

Fidelis Elevate vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 11% of the time

Vectra AI vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

Corelight vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2025

Download Flowmon product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

April 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Also Known As

Flowmon Anomaly Detection System

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

Overview

Flowmon is a professional tool for effective network troubleshooting, performance monitoring, capacity planning, encrypted traffic analysis and cloud monitoring. Instead of just the red/green infrastructure status, it helps NetOps teams to understand user experience while keeping the amount of data noise and analytical work to a minimum. Flowmon is a part of the Kemp product portfolio.

Progress Software

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

SEGA

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Flowmon vs. NetWitness NDR

April 2025

Free Report: Flowmon vs. NetWitness NDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Flowmon vs. NetWitness NDR and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Flowmon vs. NetWitness NDR report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.