Fivetran vs Uplynk comparison

Fivetran and Uplynk are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.3, while Uplynk is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0. Fivetran holds a 4.9% mindshare in DR, compared to Uplynk’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Uplynk users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

4,822 Views
434 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Uplynk

Read 6 Uplynk reviews

2,129 Views
255 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Uplynk

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Uplynk and Fivetran are competitors in data integration. While Fivetran is favored for its extensive features, Uplynk offers a more cost-effective solution.

Features: Uplynk offers video optimization, streaming capabilities, and a focus on media delivery. Fivetran provides data synchronization, integration tools across platforms, and seamless pipeline management.

Room for Improvement: Uplynk could expand its features beyond media-focused solutions, enhance scalability for larger enterprises, and improve integration versatility. Fivetran might benefit from lowering its cost, further simplifying user interface customization, and expanding its real-time data capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fivetran is known for easy deployment and strong customer service, simplifying integration with existing systems. Uplynk also offers straightforward deployment, particularly suited for media-rich environments focused on video content.

Pricing and ROI: Uplynk offers a competitive pricing model with appealing ROI for cost-conscious businesses. Fivetran, though pricier, provides a high ROI for those needing comprehensive data solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Uplynk Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Uplynk

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

Uplynk

Ranking in Data Replication

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (31st), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.9%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Uplynk is 3.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fivetran	4.9%
Uplynk	3.4%
Other	91.7%

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Joe Hernandez

Senior Software Engineer at OmniTier Inc

Improved mobile app development and user experience through optimization and security

The most valuable aspects include the optimization of application performance by optimizing API calls for a smoother user experience and faster load times. Furthermore, I restructured our code base to establish a more efficient development workflow. During my tenure, I integrated various security features for mobile applications, such as JWT tokens for secure authentication and data encryption using AES algorithms. I also focused on secure storage options, secure coding practices, and platform-specific security compliance, like Android's SafeNet and iOS Secure Enclave.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"Overall, I would rate Fivetran nine out of ten."

"HVR Software's most valuable features are that it's simple to use and allows us to use the command line to quickly complete the entire universal replicative setup."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"There's the general feature of the platform where it just makes it very easy to integrate different things, but I would say a specific difference is their integration of DBT,."

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature; it's very easy and quick to set up and it also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface, where for GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

"The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available."

More Fivetran pros

"Without EdgeCast, our website was taking 10 to 15 seconds to load; with EdgeCast, it loads under five seconds and it's a good product."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the Uplynk platform for streaming purposes."

"It's super easy to use and integrate with."

"The customer support and service responsiveness were excellent."

"The Rules Engine V4 is the most valuable feature."

"I recommend this solution because, for me, it's one of the most efficient and performant CDN operators."

"The product is easy to use and easy to implement."

Cons

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"The experience of using SDK connectors can be improved, as it lacks computational power, which is an area that needs enhancement."

"We use a separate tool for "reverse ETL", which is the opposite of what Fivetran does; it pushes data from your data warehouse back out to business applications. If Fivetran pulls data from those same applications, they should also enable users to push it back. I would love to do both ETL and reverse ETL in the same tool."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

More Fivetran cons

"The comparable features that we are looking at fits into Cloudflare's free version, as opposed to Verizon EdgeCast, which we are paying for."

"We could not create more than 15 custom rules."

"The tool needs to resolve its lack of innovation."

"In the next release, I would like to see more global endpoints for their CDN and a lower price."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old. It's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

"The web interface of the Verizon Edgecast portal is very old; it's not user-friendly, slow, and it is missing some valuable features like the ability to make bulk changes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The solution is affordable."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheaper compared to other solutions."

"Be careful about the options because to have all the features can be very expensive."

"When I modeled it out, we are spending somewhere between $600 to $800 a month with Verizon EdgeCast."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Edgio Global CDN?

The pricing was initially very expensive. However, after improving and restructuring the application, it became more affordable and now offers reasonable pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Edgio Global CDN?

Regarding improvements, I focused on testing and compatibility to ensure reliability across various mobile devices. By writing comprehensive tests and leveraging Expo's capabilities, I ensured cons...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Edgio Global CDN?

I usually use the product for mobile development. At my last company, OmniTier, I worked as a senior principal software engineer, and one of my responsibilities was leading mobile app development. ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Akamai vs Uplynk

Compared 9% of the time

Fastly vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Qwilt vs Uplynk

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudflare vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

Windows Azure CDN vs Uplynk

Compared 5% of the time

More Uplynk Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

March 2026

Download Uplynk product report

Also Known As

No data available

Edgio, Limelight Content Delivery, Limelight Orchestrate Delivery, Limelight Origin Storage, Global CDN, Verizon EdgeCast

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Uplynk is a robust platform providing CDN integration and optimized streaming services, improving user experience and application performance. It offers control over CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations, supporting seamless asset management and mobile security.

Uplynk enhances application performance through efficient API calls, optimized web server loads, and robust CDN configurations. It ensures high availability and performance by leveraging Verizon EdgeCast CDN, crucial for managing high-volume traffic on e-commerce platforms. Though Uplynk excels in asset caching and mobile security with JWT tokens and AES encryption, some users note its global reach needs improvement, and its interface lacks modern user-friendliness. Deployment of new rules can be slower compared to competitors, while documentation and rate limiting features require enhancement. Despite this, Uplynk remains a preferred choice for organizations seeking streamlined web server load optimization and enhanced application performance.

What are Uplynk's key features?

Rules Engine V4: Manages CDN caching, redirects, and asset transformations.
Seamless Integration: Easily integrates with Verizon's existing offerings.
Efficient API Calls: Enhances streaming and application performance.
Staging Support: Testing in staging environments without impacting production.
Mobile Security: Includes JWT tokens and AES encryption.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Improved Load Times: Efficient CDN configurations enhance site speed.
Enhanced User Navigation: Optimized performance for high-volume traffic.
DDoS Protection: Layer 3, 4, and 7 protection for comprehensive security.
Performance Optimization: Mobile development and streamlined caching.

Organizations deploy Uplynk to optimize web server load, enhance streaming service performance and support high-traffic volume management, especially in e-commerce. Its security measures, combined with Verizon EdgeCast CDN, ensure high availability and reliable performance, enhancing mobile engagement through specialized frameworks.

Uplynk

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

TD Ameritrade, Plus500, Solvay Bank, Yahoo, Deckers Brands, and Coach

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Uplynk

March 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Uplynk

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Uplynk and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Uplynk report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.