Fivetran vs HiT Software DBMoto comparison

Fivetran and HiT Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while HiT Software is ranked #23. Fivetran holds a 4.4% mindshare in DR, compared to HiT Software’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of HiT Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

189 Views
123 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

HiT Software DBMoto

Read 2 HiT Software DBMoto reviews

49 Views
38 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

HiT Software DBMoto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

HiT Software DBMoto and Fivetran compete in the data integration market. Fivetran has the upper hand due to comprehensive features that enhance automation and efficiency.

Features: HiT Software DBMoto focuses on real-time data integration with high flexibility for configuring transformations and supports various data sources and targets. Fivetran emphasizes automated data pipelines requiring minimal maintenance, offering quick data extraction and integration across numerous cloud-based apps and databases with robust automation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HiT Software DBMoto requires more technical expertise for installation, benefiting from responsive customer support. Fivetran provides an easy deployment model with a simple setup that demands less technical expertise, supported by strong customer service, ensuring quicker adoption.

Pricing and ROI: HiT Software DBMoto has a competitive pricing structure with lower initial costs, providing solid ROI if efficiently managed. Fivetran has a higher price point but offers simplified setup and automated processes that enhance productivity and long-term ROI, making it a valuable investment for those seeking efficiency and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (11th), Cloud Data Integration (5th)

HiT Software DBMoto

Ranking in Data Replication

23rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 4.4%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HiT Software DBMoto is 1.2%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

reviewer1077405

Works at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Replication monitor feature is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication

We appreciate the ease of use in this solution. It looks like File Explorer, where you set up your source and targets. Replications are created simply by using the replication wizard. It also has functionality for scheduling, verification, and alerts. The ability to write code for transformations is very useful. Once the replications are set up it is simple to maintain. The Replication monitor is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication. Replication logs and history files are very useful for determining problematic data issues. The transaction latency tool is also helpful for determining how many connections are required for larger files. The replication types that are available are: Refresh Only, Continuous, and Synchronization. We currently use Refresh Only (scheduled refreshes), and Continuous. The source and target table verification is very helpful for running checks. The Replication Monitor is also a great plus, which shows a quick view of the replication status.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very easy to use and very easy to configure."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"The ease of setting up the connectors and transformations is highly valuable."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

More Fivetran pros

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."

Cons

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"There is not a lot of options to customize the pipeline, and the cost is high."

"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded."

"The customization could improve because Fivetran gives more thought to people who don't want to manage analytics workflows rather than engineers who want to be able to customize pipelines more thoroughly."

"It should have a few more monitoring functionalities."

"The solution is very expensive. I would like to have a better integration of the solution with Azure."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"Their pricing has increased over the years, so it's not seen as an advantage anymore."

More Fivetran cons

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"The solution is affordable."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"I found the price to be quite reasonable."

"Customers pay a license fee yearly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 100% of the time

More HiT Software DBMoto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

June 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

June 2025

Download HiT Software DBMoto product report

Also Known As

No data available

DBMoto

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

HiT Software DBMoto provides an optimal data replication and Change Data Capture solution based on open standards, which enables an IT crew or systems integrator to implement cost-effective, extensible solutions across heterogeneous databases, high-speed analytic systems/platforms and Cloud-based systems

HiT Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

JAS Forwarding Worldwide, Animal, Financiera Pagos Internacionales C.F., Bur de Credito, Qualitas-IT, EFCO Corporation, Andrews Consulting, ASL Modena, BancAssurance Popolari S.p.A., Banco BICSA, Cheshire County Council, Epson Precision, Ferrari North America

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

May 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.