Fivetran vs HiT Software DBMoto comparison

Fivetran and HiT Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while HiT Software is ranked #24. Fivetran holds a 5.2% mindshare in DR, compared to HiT Software’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of HiT Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

4,197 Views
210 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

HiT Software DBMoto

Read 2 HiT Software DBMoto reviews

382 Views
50 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

HiT Software DBMoto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

HiT Software DBMoto and Fivetran compete in the data integration market. Fivetran has the upper hand due to comprehensive features that enhance automation and efficiency.

Features: HiT Software DBMoto focuses on real-time data integration with high flexibility for configuring transformations and supports various data sources and targets. Fivetran emphasizes automated data pipelines requiring minimal maintenance, offering quick data extraction and integration across numerous cloud-based apps and databases with robust automation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HiT Software DBMoto requires more technical expertise for installation, benefiting from responsive customer support. Fivetran provides an easy deployment model with a simple setup that demands less technical expertise, supported by strong customer service, ensuring quicker adoption.

Pricing and ROI: HiT Software DBMoto has a competitive pricing structure with lower initial costs, providing solid ROI if efficiently managed. Fivetran has a higher price point but offers simplified setup and automated processes that enhance productivity and long-term ROI, making it a valuable investment for those seeking efficiency and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Cloud Data Integration (7th)

HiT Software DBMoto

Ranking in Data Replication

24th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 5.2%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HiT Software DBMoto is 1.5%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

reviewer1077405

Works at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Replication monitor feature is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication

We appreciate the ease of use in this solution. It looks like File Explorer, where you set up your source and targets. Replications are created simply by using the replication wizard. It also has functionality for scheduling, verification, and alerts. The ability to write code for transformations is very useful. Once the replications are set up it is simple to maintain. The Replication monitor is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication. Replication logs and history files are very useful for determining problematic data issues. The transaction latency tool is also helpful for determining how many connections are required for larger files. The replication types that are available are: Refresh Only, Continuous, and Synchronization. We currently use Refresh Only (scheduled refreshes), and Continuous. The source and target table verification is very helpful for running checks. The Replication Monitor is also a great plus, which shows a quick view of the replication status.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The general data ingestion is valuable. It's used for a lot of data. It provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"The solution is stable. We've never faced any stability issues."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"The portal is very intuitive and easy to use."

More Fivetran pros

"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

Cons

"More connectors are needed for exotic, popular, and rising star portals."

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"Fivetran is very expensive for data sources with a lot of rows, such as email data. I would like to see cheaper pricing for data sources like that."

"This solution needs to improve its real-time data and transformation availability."

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

More Fivetran cons

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"I found the price to be quite reasonable."

"Customers pay a license fee yearly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 11% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 61% of the time

Syniti Data Replication vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 39% of the time

More HiT Software DBMoto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

August 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

August 2025

Download HiT Software DBMoto product report

Also Known As

No data available

DBMoto

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

HiT Software DBMoto provides an optimal data replication and Change Data Capture solution based on open standards, which enables an IT crew or systems integrator to implement cost-effective, extensible solutions across heterogeneous databases, high-speed analytic systems/platforms and Cloud-based systems

HiT Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

JAS Forwarding Worldwide, Animal, Financiera Pagos Internacionales C.F., Bur de Credito, Qualitas-IT, EFCO Corporation, Andrews Consulting, ASL Modena, BancAssurance Popolari S.p.A., Banco BICSA, Cheshire County Council, Epson Precision, Ferrari North America

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

August 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.