Fivetran vs HiT Software DBMoto comparison

Fivetran and HiT Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. Fivetran is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9, while HiT Software is ranked #22. Fivetran holds a 3.9% mindshare in DR, compared to HiT Software’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of HiT Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 27 Fivetran reviews

197 Views
146 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

HiT Software DBMoto

Read 2 HiT Software DBMoto reviews

52 Views
43 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

HiT Software DBMoto

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

HiT Software DBMoto and Fivetran compete in the data integration market. Fivetran has the upper hand due to comprehensive features that enhance automation and efficiency.

Features: HiT Software DBMoto focuses on real-time data integration with high flexibility for configuring transformations and supports various data sources and targets. Fivetran emphasizes automated data pipelines requiring minimal maintenance, offering quick data extraction and integration across numerous cloud-based apps and databases with robust automation capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HiT Software DBMoto requires more technical expertise for installation, benefiting from responsive customer support. Fivetran provides an easy deployment model with a simple setup that demands less technical expertise, supported by strong customer service, ensuring quicker adoption.

Pricing and ROI: HiT Software DBMoto has a competitive pricing structure with lower initial costs, providing solid ROI if efficiently managed. Fivetran has a higher price point but offers simplified setup and automated processes that enhance productivity and long-term ROI, making it a valuable investment for those seeking efficiency and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Replication

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

HiT Software DBMoto

Ranking in Data Replication

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 3.9%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HiT Software DBMoto is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Mediha Šiljić

Lead Data Engineer at Sensilab

Built-in connectors offer extensive data source integration and time savings

Fivetran could improve by adapting more for technical users and by providing more options for such users. There should be more adaptability in terms of new features. If a specific feature is required, it should be integrated promptly. Improvement in existing connectors with new features is desirable. Enhancements around customer-focused product adaptation are also suggested.

Read full review

reviewer1077405

Works at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Replication monitor feature is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication

We appreciate the ease of use in this solution. It looks like File Explorer, where you set up your source and targets. Replications are created simply by using the replication wizard. It also has functionality for scheduling, verification, and alerts. The ability to write code for transformations is very useful. Once the replications are set up it is simple to maintain. The Replication monitor is helpful in that it allows a quick view of the status, errors, and results of the last replication. Replication logs and history files are very useful for determining problematic data issues. The transaction latency tool is also helpful for determining how many connections are required for larger files. The replication types that are available are: Refresh Only, Continuous, and Synchronization. We currently use Refresh Only (scheduled refreshes), and Continuous. The source and target table verification is very helpful for running checks. The Replication Monitor is also a great plus, which shows a quick view of the replication status.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Making the decision to implement Fivetran was supported by the fact that they have better connectors than other competitors."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"For us, Fivetran has been able to scale both in terms of the data we bring into our warehouse and the amount of data that we use as well."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"Fivetran is remarkably easy to use; I haven't encountered any other data integration tool that is as user-friendly."

"The user interface is mostly UI-based, eliminating the need for a lot of coding."

"The ease of usability is the most valuable feature. It's very easy and quick to set up. It also has a central hub as opposed to GoldenGate which is one direct interface. For GoldenGate I would have needed three interfaces whereas with HVR I have a central interface that manages everything."

More Fivetran pros

"The most valuable features are that is easy to install and it is user-friendly."

"DBMoto was very simple to set up and move our tables to the Oracle DB."

Cons

"The documentation can be laid out better to make it easier to find things, and I really wish there was built-in support for changing passwords. Some features don't work as advertised for the platform/repository database, and HVR is not always the fastest at getting results."

"Fivetran could improve in the area of customization, especially in how they socialize their tools."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"The connections with SAP must be improved."

"Fivetran should add more connectors because its competitors, like Airbyte, have more connectors."

More Fivetran cons

"Pricing is an area that needs improvement."

"This product would be improved with additional built-in functions for simpler date conversion, as well as for data type transformations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I've heard that the license for HVR is a bit costly compared to its competitors, but since it's reliable and efficient, I think the customer shouldn't be bothered about the cost."

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"Customers pay a license fee yearly."

"I found the price to be quite reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

22%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 14% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Fivetran

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs HiT Software DBMoto

Compared 100% of the time

More HiT Software DBMoto Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

May 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Replication

May 2025

Download HiT Software DBMoto product report

Also Known As

No data available

DBMoto

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

HiT Software DBMoto provides an optimal data replication and Change Data Capture solution based on open standards, which enables an IT crew or systems integrator to implement cost-effective, extensible solutions across heterogeneous databases, high-speed analytic systems/platforms and Cloud-based systems

HiT Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

JAS Forwarding Worldwide, Animal, Financiera Pagos Internacionales C.F., Bur de Credito, Qualitas-IT, EFCO Corporation, Andrews Consulting, ASL Modena, BancAssurance Popolari S.p.A., Banco BICSA, Cheshire County Council, Epson Precision, Ferrari North America

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

April 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. HiT Software DBMoto report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.