Fidelis Elevate vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram comparison

Fidelis Security and SentinelOne are both solutions in the Threat Deception Platforms category. Fidelis Security is ranked #10, while SentinelOne is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.0. Additionally, 100% of Fidelis Security users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SentinelOne users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fidelis Elevate and SentinelOne Singularity Hologram based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Cynet, SentinelOne and others in Threat Deception Platforms.

To learn more, read our detailed Threat Deception Platforms Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Threat Deception Platforms

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,264 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

Graham Peck

Data Security Manager at Leeds United FC

Lockdown devices and ports on endpoints so that you can stop propagation of any virus if it's detected but performance utilization can be better

It's scalable in the form of it now covers mobile devices as well as a number of other different types of devices, not just Windows. Also, there's no limit as to how many devices you can install it on. We plan to expand the number of devices/users as we get more people onboard or upgrade to more mobile devices; we will then increase the number of licenses for mobile devices. We've got 450 licenses, but we've got about 375 devices and users currently. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. There's not a product yet that I've found that I can't put it on, especially now that they've got the new release, which was the mobile agents.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable."

"It is easy to use."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the user interface."

"What I like about Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is that it is a comprehensive solution that contains everything the organization may need when using endpoints."

"There has been a significant reduction of approximately 70% to 80% in our internal MTTR and MTTD metrics, now around five to eight minutes whereas previously it was hours, which has helped tremendously."

"I can highlight that we have not faced any security incidents with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and even though our environment is quite dynamic, we have not faced any security incident with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks until now."

"The normal protection was really effective, and we detected situations that if we didn't have Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, it's highly likely that we would have been affected, but it protected the infrastructure."

"The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The solution's technical support is perfect, so I rate the technical support a ten out of ten"

"It has a rating system now so you can rate things up or down, depending on your environment. This means alerting can be customized, yet still pick up anomalies."

"After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment of the server doesn't take so long; about a day or two max."

"It is used as our primary in-line IDS/IPS system, replacing FireEye NX, and it catches more, looks at more ports than FireEye NX, and is a scalable appliance, unlike our NX which was saturated and shut itself down."

"There are many valuable features. The NDR gives very good network visibility, and the endpoint module has a great feature called "Live Connect" for remote connections. They also have "Tasks" that can be run on endpoints to gather specific information or retrieve logs."

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity. It covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

"The automated response capability in SentinelOne enhances security operations. It means I don't have to worry about having too many security people watching it because you can automate a lot of the tasks."

Cons

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"The deployment is pretty hard."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control."

"The onboarding process could be better."

"Technology evolves every day, so it would be nice if it gets more secure. It can also have more integration with other platforms."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks could improve by adding a sandbox feature to better compete with their competitors which have it."

"We had a problem with getting our older endpoints up to date, but their newest updates have been really good. I've been pleased with it in terms of what our needs are. It's doing what we want it to do."

"It's more focused on network communication. If a customer wants to increase the level of protection and start working with documents, it's impossible to integrate these features into the system. It's more of a communication-oriented system than a content security-oriented system."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product making it one of its shortcomings that needs improvement."

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

More Fidelis Elevate cons

"The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is high for the license and in general."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"The solution has one subscription for endpoint protection and one subscription for detection and response. The two licenses combined give you the BRO version."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"Its pricing is kind of in line with its competitors and everybody else out there."

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"Cortex XDR is a costly solution."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

"I would rate the pricing a three out of ten; one is very expensive, and ten is an absolutely cheap product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Deception Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?

It's obviously increased my cost when it comes to security management because I didn't have it before, and it isn't t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?

The performance utilization on the device that it's monitoring. This aspect needs improvement.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SentinelOne Singularity Hologram?

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. I won't give it a ten. I've seen some others that I may next t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 2% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram

Compared 15% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram

Compared 13% of the time

Acalvio vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram

Compared 10% of the time

Proofpoint Identity Threat Defense vs SentinelOne Singularity Hologram

Compared 8% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Hologram Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

March 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

March 2026

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

February 2026

Download SentinelOne Singularity Hologram product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

Attivo Networks

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.

Fidelis Security

Singularity Hologram, a component of the SentinelOne Singularity platform, leverages advanced, high-interaction deception and decoy technology to lure in-network attackers and insider threat actors into engaging and revealing themselves. By mimicking production IT, IoT, and OT OSes, applications, data, native cloud technologies, and more, Singularity Hologram uncovers covert adversary activity, collects high-fidelity telemetry, and garners actionable intelligence to help you strengthen your defenses. Singularity Hologram decoys appear indistinguishable from production assets and are designed to engage and misdirect attackers away from real systems and data. All decoys encompass a breadth of form factors, adapting to a variety of business & organizational needs.

SentinelOne

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

First Midwest Bank

NSS Labs., Fierce IT security, FireEye

Buyer's Guide

Threat Deception Platforms

February 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Commvault, Cynet, SentinelOne and others in Threat Deception Platforms. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,264 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Threat Deception Platforms vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Threat Deception Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.