Evidian Web Access Manager vs IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager [EOL] vs Oracle Access Manager comparison

The compared Atos and IBM solutions aren't in the same category. Atos is ranked #4 in WAM , and holds a 10.1% mindshare in the category. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution.

Evidian Web Access Manager

221 Views
71 Comparison Views

IBM Tivoli Federated Identi...

Read 1 IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager [EOL] review

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Access Manager

Read 21 Oracle Access Manager reviews

1,227 Views
1,141 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Evidian Web Access Manager

IBM Tivoli Federated Identi...

Oracle Access Manager

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Featured Reviews

Use Evidian Web Access Manager?

Leave a review

reviewer287652

Presales Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

A stable and scalable web security and identity management solution.

The solution is good, but it's pretty complex. So, I wouldn't recommend this solution to anyone without extensive security knowledge. The administration and configuration aren't straightforward. If the implementation takes up to six months, it will be costly. On a scale from one to ten, I would give IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager an eight.

Read full review

SurajShah

Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers strong support and consistent updates improve security features

It is a heavyweight application. The product deployment and installation takes time, and the environment details are complex. ForgeRock is very quick to deploy on Tomcat, but Oracle Access Manager must be deployed on WebLogic, a heavyweight server. You cannot deploy Oracle Access Manager on Tomcat. If an organization has sufficient budget to spend on servers, then it is useful. For organizations that do not want to spend too much money on Oracle Access Manager, maintenance and upgrades take time, whereas with ForgeRock, that is the opposite as fewer resources are required. Being a heavyweight application, it will take more time for deployment and installation compared to ForgeRock or Okta. Okta is cloud-based, so it does not take much time. ForgeRock on-premise only needs deployment on a Tomcat server, making it less complex as it is a lightweight application.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Access Manager?

I am currently not exposed to the pricing issue, but I think Oracle Access Manager is more expensive than other produ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Access Manager?

For scalability, Oracle Access Manager demonstrates a high level due to high availability and scalability with redund...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Access Manager?

My main use cases for Oracle Access Manager involve using it as an authentication server integrated with Oracle Inter...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Evidian Web Access Manager

Compared 57% of the time

Symantec Siteminder vs Evidian Web Access Manager

Compared 43% of the time

More Evidian Web Access Manager Competitors

Symantec Siteminder vs IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager [EOL]

Compared 100% of the time

More IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager [EOL] Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText Access Manager with Managed Services vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 20% of the time

Okta Platform vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 14% of the time

ForgeRock vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security Verify Access vs Oracle Access Manager

Compared 10% of the time

More Oracle Access Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Access Management

January 2026

Download Evidian Web Access Manager product report

No data available

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Access Manager

January 2026

Download Oracle Access Manager product report

Also Known As

Web Access Manager

Tivoli Federated Identity Manager

No data available

Overview

Evidian Web Access Manager offers a coherent infrastructure that secures your Web applications. Evidian Web Access Manager makes your organization's security policy more consistent, reduces management costs and accelerates your e-business activities.

Atos

IBM Tivoli Federated Identity Manager provides web and federated single sign-on (SSO) to users across multiple applications. It uses federated SSO for security-rich information sharing for private, public and hybrid cloud deployments. With it you can enable security-rich business collaboration in the cloud.

IBM

Oracle Access Manager delivers risk-aware end-to-end user authentication, single sign-on, and authorization protection, enabling enterprises to secure access from mobile devices and seamlessly integrate social identities with applications.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Systel, Navantia, Winchester City Council, Copperchase Ltd

EXA Corporation

SekerBank, University of Melbourne