Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Everlaw vs Logikcull comparison

Everlaw and Reveal are both solutions in the eDiscovery category. Everlaw is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0, while Reveal is ranked #17. Everlaw holds a 1.7% mindshare in eD, compared to Reveal’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Everlaw users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of Reveal users who would recommend it.
Everlaw
Read 3 Everlaw reviews
  • 87 Views
  • 37 Comparison Views
66% willing to recommend
Logikcull
Read 2 Logikcull reviews
  • 204 Views
  • 99 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Everlaw and Logikcull compete in the eDiscovery platform category. Logikcull seems to have the upper hand due to higher user satisfaction, notably in features and overall value.

Features: Everlaw is known for robust search capabilities, intuitive organization tools, and reliable support. Logikcull is recognized for automatic organization, data processing efficiency, and strong automation, making it stand out in ease of use.

Room for Improvement: Everlaw users frequently mention the need for improved document review speed, better integrations, and enhanced user interface. Logikcull users seek improved customization options, occasionally report concerns over scalability, and desire faster data processing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Everlaw is noted for seamless deployment and reliable customer support, slightly better in immediate responsiveness. Logikcull offers cloud-based ease of installation with a responsive support team.

Pricing and ROI: Everlaw offers competitive pricing, appealing to cost-efficient users, while Logikcull's pricing is higher. Despite the higher cost, Logikcull provides strong ROI through its feature-rich offerings, justifying the investment for those prioritizing advanced functionality.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Everlaw vs. Logikcull Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Everlaw vs. Logikcull
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Everlaw
Ranking in eDiscovery
10th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Logikcull
Ranking in eDiscovery
17th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Investigation Management Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of Everlaw is 1.7%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Logikcull is 1.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

SimardeepSingh - PeerSpot reviewer
An user-friendly solution that provides fast and accurate processing capabilities
The product is very user-friendly. When new employees join, they find Everlaw the easiest to learn among our different eDiscovery tools, such as Relativity, Canopy, and Nuix. It's simple to use, even for third-party uploads. Their support team is very good and resolves issues quickly. Everlaw is fast and accurate in processing. Producing documents is easy - we create and use a protocol for future productions. Processing errors in Everlaw can't be fixed, which is efficient. We use the tool specifically for unitization in many projects. It's very easy for reviewers to use. Everlaw is improving daily, introducing new features like analytics and AI. Analytics in Everlaw runs by default when we process anything. We used AI to train the system for review in a project with five million records. I think Everlaw's predictive coding tools are good. It's an AI feature that provides responsive documents. We train the model with 50 responsive or 50 non-responsive documents, and it uses that to pull out responsive documents and exclude non-responsive ones for reviewers. This is a great feature of the tool.
Read full review
VS
Powerfully simple legal software for processing, reviewing, and producing data
First of all, uploading the documents is super easy. You just throw it in a zip, and unless it's a PST, then you can throw it in directly. The process of tagging, and searching. It's got a greatly intuitive, advanced search mechanism. The best part of all is just the downloading of the actual Bates stamped documents, and then sharing them with other people. Then you can see when the other party has accessed it. So if they say, "I never got it." Then you can say, "Yeah, you did here. Here, you accessed it on this day at this time. So you did." It's like a date and time stamp. The dashboards are gorgeous. They have helped me through so many possibilities — I could talk all day about Logikcull. When you're getting ready to produce, it will say "You have things that are marked privileged." Or "You have things that are potentially privileged." What Logikcull does is gather as many email addresses for law firms in the world as possible. They will gather those email addresses, and then if there are any of those email addresses that come up, they will say, "These are potentially privileged. You might want to look at them before you produce them." They've got a good quality control mechanism within the program too. Eclipse SE doesn't because it's server-based, so you have to do quality control on your own. There's this built-in "Wait a minute. Don't produce, look at this first, before you do the production." It has really saved me a couple of times.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We rely heavily on the search term report, which shows how documents are distributed across selected keywords. This helps us determine if a keyword produces too many results, indicating it might be too broad."
"We use the tool specifically for unitization in many projects. It's very easy for reviewers to use. Everlaw is improving daily, introducing new features like analytics and AI. Analytics in Everlaw runs by default when we process anything. We used AI to train the system for review in a project with five million records."
"In Everlaw, you can add related items within a search to a search component, allowing you to build and expand your search incrementally. For example, you can start with an initial search, add related items, and then continue adding more related items to the entire search. Another thing about Everlaw is its speed. It loads quickly, whether it's images or documents."
"The most valuable feature which I found was that it was very user-friendly. It's a very new age-friendly tech for uploading the data into the software. It also has a wonderful representation of data in terms of dashboards and pivot charts where you get your data represented in various angles and projections."
"Uploading the documents is super easy. You just throw it in a zip, and unless it's a PST, then you can throw it in directly."
 

Cons

"The support team is open to suggestions. They regularly release updates, often monthly, which include new features and improvements."
"Everlaw could be less choosy about accepting control numbers for third-party loads. When uploading third-party loads, it currently needs two mandatory fields (like within date or end date or page count). I think the control number should be the only required field. Everlaw isn't used for Data Breach projects. For normal eDiscovery, we can use Everlaw, but most clients prefer Relativity."
"It would be better if they could include a technology-assisted review feature, which brings artificial intelligence into the cloud and the system itself. It would be great savings in terms of time and costs as you won't have a person manually going into a dense asset of documents and doing it."
"The guys over at Logikcull will do everything possible to avoid a screen-share — they do everything via text."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is higher than that of other tools. Other tools offer bundle rates, but Everlaw charges per GB, which is more expensive. It doesn't charge for users; it only charges for hosting."
"The cost depends on the case size of the data and the number of projects they're expecting to encounter. If it's small to medium-sized, this tool will be very good because it has a pay-as-you-go feature instead of an hourly billing rate, where they bill you every hour, and you have to go through the structure from beginning to end."
"Logikcull is very expensive. I wish it were less expensive."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Legal Firm
15%
University
13%
Government
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Everlaw?
The tool's pricing is higher than that of other tools. Other tools offer bundle rates, but Everlaw charges per GB, which is more expensive. It doesn't charge for users; it only charges for hosting.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Everlaw?
Everlaw could be less choosy about accepting control numbers for third-party loads. When uploading third-party loads, it currently needs two mandatory fields (like within date or end date or page c...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Everlaw?
I have a higher certification in Everlaw for managerial organization. We use Everlaw for everything, like processing documents, creating STRs, promoting documents, and using analytics. I support ou...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Everlaw Logo
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Everlaw
Compared 100% of the time
More Everlaw Competitors
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Logikcull Logo
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Logikcull
Compared 61% of the time
kCura Relativity vs Logikcull Logo
kCura Relativity vs Logikcull
Compared 39% of the time
More Logikcull Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
June 2025
Everlaw reportDownload Everlaw product report
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
June 2025
Logikcull reportDownload Logikcull product report
 

Overview

Everlaw is thoughtfully architected to be the fastest, most powerful, and easiest ediscovery solution on the market. We bring the superior software experiences you’re used to in your consumer life — the blink-and-you’ll-miss-it speed of Google and the blissful usability of Apple products — to your litigation toolkit.
Everlaw

Logikcull provides a secure, central repository with bank-level encryption where you can host all your complex search projects and most sensitive data. Fortune 500 companies, major law firms, and top government organizations trust Logikcull with their data.

  • Backed by AWS, the most trusted cloud provider in the world
  • Bank-level security encrypts data in transit and at rest at the file level
  • Permissions-based user roles allow you to control who sees your data
  • Real-time tracking shows you all in-app activity.
Reveal
 

Sample Customers

Trusted by 8 of the top 10 class action law firms and over 65% of state attorneys general
Williams, Veolia, Salesforce, NYC, The Sierra Club Foundation, Unisys, Zenefits, Airgas, Haynes Boones, Earth Justice
Buyer's Guide
Everlaw vs. Logikcull
June 2025
Free Report: Everlaw vs. Logikcull
Find out what your peers are saying about Everlaw vs. Logikcull and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Everlaw vs. Logikcull report.
See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.